The Dynamics and Functions of Self-Organization in the Fuzzy Front End: Empirical Evidence from the Austrian Semiconductor Industry

This paper studies the functions, impacts and dynamics of self-organization in the fuzzy front end of innovation. Based on a case study approach, the new product development processes of five Austrian semiconductor companies are analysed. We adopt a complexity science perspective which stresses that self-organization and emergence are key elements of the new product development process. We found that self-organization mechanisms occur in two ways. First, self-organizational activities support formal and top-down managed new product development processes. In this way, they contribute to the acceleration and adaptation of the new product development process and are also a way to overcome bureaucratic structures. Second, we found evidence for the existence of purely emergent bottom-up processes in many cases. In this context, employees intrinsically and without any explicit order or strategy took initiatives to innovate. Such activities run in parallel to or precede formal new product development processes and employees deliberately bypass and even ignore formal processes such as financial incentive systems, suggestion schemes and patenting rules in order to promote their ideas. These activities are often secret until they are mature enough to be presented to the management, when they are then, if evaluated positively, incorporated as official projects in the new product development process.

[1]  Alan Stringer,et al.  THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES , 2004 .

[2]  Robert A. Burgelman A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[3]  J. Barker Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[4]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Introduction: Chaos, Complexity and Organization Theory , 1998 .

[5]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[6]  Malcolm Warner,et al.  International Encyclopedia of Business and Management , 2001 .

[7]  John K. Christiansen,et al.  Making Decisions on Innovation: Meetings or Networks? , 2007 .

[8]  T. G. Cummings Self-Regulating Work Groups: A Socio-Technical Synthesis , 1978 .

[9]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[10]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[11]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[12]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .

[13]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Learning: A Field Study , 2001 .

[14]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization , 2000 .

[15]  R. Stacey Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics , 1993 .

[16]  Robert G. Cooper The seven principles of the latest Stage-Gate® method add up to a streamlined, new-product idea-to-launch process. , 2006 .

[17]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[18]  R. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study , 2001 .

[19]  Diana L. Day Raising Radicals: Different Processes for Championing Innovative Corporate Ventures , 1994 .

[20]  Bruno Latour,et al.  THE KEY TO SUCCESS IN INNOVATION PART I: THE ART OF INTERESSEMENT , 2002 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[22]  Miguel Pina e Cunha,et al.  Order and Disorder in Product Innovation Models , 2003 .

[23]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[24]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[25]  Christen Rose-Anderssen,et al.  New Product Development as a Complex Adaptive System of Decisions , 2006 .

[26]  E. JeffreyGoldstein,et al.  Emergence as a Construct : History and Issues , 2000 .

[27]  Peter Augsdorfer,et al.  Bootlegging and path dependency , 2005 .

[28]  R. Rothwell Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process , 1994 .

[29]  M. Crozier The Bureaucratic Phenomenon , 1964 .

[30]  I. Nonaka The knowledge creating company". Harvard Business Review : . , 1991 .

[31]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[32]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[33]  A. Griffin PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[34]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[35]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model , 2004 .

[36]  C. Anderson,et al.  Of Ants and Men: Self-Organized Teams in Human and Insect Organizations , 2003 .

[37]  M. Callon,et al.  THE KEY TO SUCCESS IN INNOVATION , 2008 .

[38]  Donde P. Ashmos,et al.  Team sense-making: A mental model for navigating uncharted territories , 2003 .

[39]  Jan Wickenberg,et al.  Rule Breaking in New Product Development - Crime or Necessity? , 2001 .

[40]  Alan G. Robinson,et al.  Corporate Creativity: How Innovation and Improvement Actually Happen , 1997 .

[41]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence , 2004 .