Assessment of a model based optimization engine for volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer

BackgroundTo evaluate in-silico the performance of a model-based optimization process for volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) applied to hepatocellular cancer treatments.Patients and methods45 clinically accepted RA plans were selected to train a knowledge-based engine for the prediction of individualized dose-volume constraints. The model was validated on the same plans used for training (closed-loop) and on a set of other 25 plans not used for the training (open-loop). Dose prescription, target size, localization in the liver and arc configuration were highly variable in both sets to appraise the power of generalization of the engine. Quantitative dose volume histogram analysis was performed as well as a pass-fail analysis against a set of 8 clinical dose-volume objectives to appraise the quality of the new plans.ResultsQualitative and quantitative equivalence was observed between the clinical and the test plans. The use of model-based optimization lead to a net improvement in the pass-rate of the clinical objectives compared to the plans originally optimized with standard methods (this pass-rate is the frequency of cases where the objectives are respected vs. the cases where constraints are not fulfilled). The increase in the pass-rate resulted of 2.0%, 0.9% and 0.5% in a closed-loop and two different open-loop validation experiments.ConclusionsA knowledge-based engine for the optimization of RapidArc plans was tested and lead to clinically acceptable plans in the case of hepatocellular cancer radiotherapy. More studies are needed before a broad clinical use.

[1]  L. Cozzi,et al.  Radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients ineligible for surgery or ablative treatments , 2013, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[2]  J. Lo,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Patricio Simari,et al.  Fully automated simultaneous integrated boosted-intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning is feasible for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective clinical study. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Xiaoning Pan,et al.  A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[7]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Clinical Investigation : Thoracic Cancer Automated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Planning for Stage III Lung Cancer : How Does It Compare With Intensity-Modulated Radio Therapy ? , 2012 .

[8]  Vorakarn Chanyavanich,et al.  Knowledge-based IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer , 2010, Medical physics.

[9]  P. Levendag,et al.  Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Di Yan,et al.  Principal component analysis-based pattern analysis of dose-volume histograms and influence on rectal toxicity. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. , 2009, Medical physics.

[12]  Dinh Van Huynh,et al.  Algebra and Its Applications , 2006 .

[13]  M. Scorsetti,et al.  Feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy and high intensity photon beams for hepatocellular carcinoma patients , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[14]  L. Cozzi,et al.  Radiation treatment with volumetric modulated arc therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Early clinical outcome and toxicity profile from a retrospective analysis of 138 patients , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[15]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  James Wheeler,et al.  Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: An inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[17]  Yaorong Ge,et al.  Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[18]  Y. Ge,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[19]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning. , 2012, Medical physics.

[20]  D. Low,et al.  Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.