Evolution and Complexity: The Double-Edged Sword

We attempt to provide a comprehensive answer to the question of whether, and when, an arrow of complexity emerges in Darwinian evolution. We note that this expression can be interpreted in different ways, including a passive, incidental growth, or a pervasive bias towards complexification. We argue at length that an arrow of complexity does indeed occur in evolution, which can be most reasonably interpreted as the result of a passive trend rather than a driven one. What, then, is the role of evolution in the creation of this trend, and under which conditions will it emerge? In the later sections of this article we point out that when certain proper conditions (which we attempt to formulate in a concise form) are met, Darwinian evolution predictably creates a sustained trend of increase in maximum complexity (that is, an arrow of complexity) that would not be possible without it; but if they are not, evolution will not only fail to produce an arrow of complexity, but may actually prevent any increase in complexity altogether. We conclude that, with regard to the growth of complexity, evolution is very much a double-edged sword.

[1]  N. Pierce.  Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[2]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[3]  P. Gingerich.  Stratigraphic record of Early Eocene Hyopsodus and the geometry of mammalian phylogeny , 1974, Nature.

[4]  J. Krebs,et al.  Arms races between and within species , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  P. Gingerich.  Rates of Evolution: Effects of Time and Temporal Scaling , 1983, Science.

[6]  Clive Richards,et al.  The Blind Watchmaker , 1987, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[7]  J. Bonner.  The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection , 1988 .

[8]  Martin S. Fridson,et al.  Trends , 1948, Bankmagazin.

[9]  Peter J. Angeline,et al.  Competitive Environments Evolve Better Solutions for Complex Tasks , 1993, ICGA.

[10]  D. McShea.  MECHANISMS OF LARGE‐SCALE EVOLUTIONARY TRENDS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  J. Weiner.  The Beak of the Finch: A Story of Evolution in Our Time , 1994 .

[12]  Karl Sims,et al.  Evolving 3D Morphology and Behavior by Competition , 1994, Artificial Life.

[13]  J. W. Valentine,et al.  Morphological complexity increase in metazoans , 1994, Paleobiology.

[14]  R. Foley.  Speciation, extinction and climatic change in hominid evolution , 1994 .

[15]  S. Gould.  The evolution of life on the earth. , 1994, Scientific American.

[16]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[17]  Dave Cliff,et al.  Tracking the Red Queen: Measurements of Adaptive Progress in Co-Evolutionary Simulations , 1995, ECAL.

[18]  Richard K. Belew,et al.  Methods for Competitive Co-Evolution: Finding Opponents Worth Beating , 1995, ICGA.

[19]  L. Altenberg,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  F. Maytag.  Evolution , 1996, Arch. Mus. Informatics.

[21]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Coevolution of a Backgammon Player , 1996 .

[22]  D. McShea.  PERSPECTIVE METAZOAN COMPLEXITY AND EVOLUTION: IS THERE A TREND? , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies , 1996, Nature.

[24]  D. Jablonski.  Body-size evolution in Cretaceous molluscs and the status of Cope's rule , 1997, Nature.

[25]  J. Weiner,et al.  The Beak of the Finch , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  R. Dawkins,et al.  Human Chauvinism , 1997 .

[27]  D. Wake,et al.  Genome size, secondary simplification, and the evolution of the brain in salamanders. , 1997, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[28]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Social Brain Hypothesis , 1998, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[29]  W. Whitman,et al.  Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Mark A. Bedau,et al.  Four Puzzles About Life , 1998, Artificial Life.

[31]  W. Jeffery,et al.  Evolution of Eye Regression in the Cavefish Astyanax: Apoptosis and the Pax-6 Gene' , 1998 .

[32]  R. Foley,et al.  Towards a theory of modern human origins: geography, demography, and diversity in recent human evolution. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[33]  J. Pollack,et al.  Challenges in coevolutionary learning: arms-race dynamics, open-endedness, and medicocre stable states , 1998 .

[34]  J. Crutchfield,et al.  Measures of statistical complexity: Why? , 1998 .

[35]  J. Alroy.  Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. , 1998, Science.

[36]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Co-evolving predator and prey robots , 1998, Artificial Life.

[37]  R. Boyd.  How Humans Evolved , 1999 .

[38]  F. Heylighen.  The Growth of Structural and Functional Complexity during Evolution , 1999 .

[39]  Carlo C. Maley,et al.  Four steps toward open-ended evolution , 1999 .

[40]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Automatic design and manufacture of robotic lifeforms , 2000, Nature.

[41]  J. Pollack,et al.  Coevolutionary dynamics in a minimal substrate , 2001 .

[42]  D. McShea.  The minor transitions in hierarchical evolution and the question of a directional bias , 2001 .

[43]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Cooperation and Competition in the Evolution of ATP-Producing Pathways , 2001, Science.

[44]  S. Black,et al.  Endangered Invertebrates: the case for greater attention to invertebrate conservation , 2001 .

[45]  Kenneth O. Stanley and Joseph Reisinger and Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  The Dominance Tournament Method of Monitoring Progress in Coevolution , 2002 .

[46]  Evandro Agazzi,et al.  What is Complexity , 2002 .

[47]  B. MacFadden,et al.  Chapter 17: Gigantism, Dwarfism, and Cope's Rule: “Nothing in Evolution Makes Sense without a Phylogeny” , 2004 .

[48]  K. Safi,et al.  Bigger is not always better: when brains get smaller , 2005, Biology Letters.

[49]  Daniel W. McShea,et al.  The evolution of complexity without natural selection, a possible large-scale trend of the fourth kind , 2005, Paleobiology.

[50]  Yali Xue,et al.  Principles of human evolution , 2005, Heredity.

[51]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability , 2005 .

[52]  Alastair Channon,et al.  The N-Strikes-Out Algorithm: A Steady-State Algorithm for Coevolution , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[53]  M. Cohn,et al.  Developmental basis for hind-limb loss in dolphins and origin of the cetacean bodyplan. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  B. Rosslenbroich.  The Notion of Progress in Evolutionary Biology – The Unresolved Problem and an Empirical Suggestion , 2006 .

[55]  M. Nowak,et al.  Cancer biology: Infectious tumour cells , 2006, Nature.

[56]  Chrisantha Fernando,et al.  Natural selection in chemical evolution. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[57]  Alastair Channon,et al.  Artificial Life , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.