Comparison of model estimated and measured direct-normal

Direct-normal solar irradiance (DNSI), the energy in the solar spectrum incident in unit time at the Earth{close_quote}s surface on a unit area perpendicular to the direction to the Sun, depends only on atmospheric extinction of solar energy without regard to the details of the extinction, whether absorption or scattering. Here we report a set of closure experiments performed in north central Oklahoma in April 1996 under cloud-free conditions, wherein measured atmospheric composition and aerosol optical thickness are input to a radiative transfer model, MODTRAN 3, to estimate DNSI, which is then compared with measured values obtained with normal incidence pyrheliometers and absolute cavity radiometers. Uncertainty in aerosol optical thickness (AOT) dominates the uncertainty in DNSI calculation. AOT measured by an independently calibrated Sun photometer and a rotating shadow-band radiometer agree to within the uncertainties of each measurement. For 36 independent comparisons the agreement between measured and model-estimated values of DNSI falls within the combined uncertainties in the measurement (0.3{endash}0.7{percent}) and model calculation (1.8{percent}), albeit with a slight average model underestimate ({minus}0.18{plus_minus}0.94){percent}; for a DNSI of 839Wm{sup {minus}2} this corresponds to {minus}1.5{plus_minus}7.9Wm{sup {minus}2}. The agreement is nearly independent of air mass and water-vapor path abundance. These results thus establish the accuracymore » of the current knowledge of the solar spectrum, its integrated power, and the atmospheric extinction as a function of wavelength as represented in MODTRAN 3. An important consequence is that atmospheric absorption of short-wave energy is accurately parametrized in the model to within the above uncertainties. {copyright} 1997 American Geophysical Union« less

[1]  James D. Spinhirne,et al.  Compact Eye Safe Lidar Systems , 1995 .

[2]  Albert Arking,et al.  Absorption of Solar Energy in the Atmosphere: Discrepancy Between Model and Observations , 1996, Science.

[3]  H. Neckel,et al.  The solar radiation between 3300 and 12500 Å , 1984 .

[4]  Brian L. Markham,et al.  Thematic Mapper bandpass solar exoatmospheric irradiances , 1987 .

[5]  J. C. Liljegren,et al.  A comparison of Sun photometer derivations of total column water vapor and ozone to standard measures of same at the Southern Great Plains Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site , 1995 .

[6]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Warm Pool Heat Budget and Shortwave Cloud Forcing: A Missing Physics? , 1995, Science.

[7]  P. Quinn,et al.  Closure in tropospheric aerosol-climate research : A review and future needs for addressing aerosol direct shortwave radiative forcing , 1996 .

[8]  Warren J. Wiscombe,et al.  An absorbing mystery , 1995, Nature.

[9]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Automated multifilter rotating shadow-band radiometer: an instrument for optical depth and radiation measurements. , 1994, Applied optics.

[10]  Judith L. Lean,et al.  Variations in the Sun's radiative output , 1991 .

[11]  F. X. Kneizys,et al.  MODTRAN3: Suitability as a flux-divergence code , 1995 .

[12]  Arthur C. Neuendorffer,et al.  Ozone monitoring with TIROS‐N operational vertical sounders , 1996 .

[13]  D. W. Nelson,et al.  Optimal Measurement of Surface Shortwave Irradiance Using Current Instrumentation , 1997 .

[14]  J. Penner,et al.  Quantifying and minimizing uncertainty of climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols , 1994 .

[15]  H. Hudson,et al.  Long-Term Downward Trend in Total Solar Irradiance , 1986, Science.

[16]  B. Markham,et al.  Aerosol optical properties over the midcontinental United States , 1992 .

[17]  Robert C. Beardsley,et al.  Separation of Tidal and Subtidal Currents in Ship-Mounted Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Observations , 1992 .

[18]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  Extrapolation of Earth-Based Solar Irradiance Measurements to Exoatmospheric Levels for Broad-Band and Selected Absorption-Band Observations , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  Direct Observations of Excess Solar Absorption by Clouds , 1995, Science.

[20]  C. H. Whitlock,et al.  Absorption of Solar Radiation by Clouds: Observations Versus Models , 1995, Science.

[21]  B. Lesht,et al.  Comparison of precipitable water vapor measurements obtained by microwave radiometry and radiosondes at the Southern Great ... , 1996 .

[22]  Junfeng Wang,et al.  FASCODE for the environment (FASE) , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[23]  W. Schmutz,et al.  Third comparison of the World Radiometric Reference and the SI radiometric scale , 1995 .

[24]  Brian L. Markham,et al.  Overview of atmospheric correction and radiometric calibration efforts during FIFE , 1992 .

[25]  T. Eck,et al.  Sun photometric measurements of atmospheric water vapor column abundance in the 940‐nm band , 1997 .

[26]  Brian L. Markham,et al.  Aerosol optical depth retrievals over the Konza Prairie , 1992 .

[27]  Gail P. Anderson,et al.  Prediction and measurement of direct-normal solar irradiance: A closure experiment , 1997 .

[28]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program: Programmatic Background and Design of the Cloud and Radiation Test Bed , 1994 .

[29]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  How Much Solar Radiation Do Clouds Absorb? , 1996, Science.

[30]  D. Imre,et al.  Quantifying Cloud-Induced Shortwave Absorption: An Examination of Uncertainties and of Recent Arguments for Large Excess Absorption , 1996 .