Neurophysiological correlates of perception–action binding in the somatosensory system

Action control requires precisely and flexibly linking sensory input and motor output. This is true for both, visuo-motor and somatosensory-motor integration. However, while perception–action integration has been extensively investigated for the visual modality, data on how somatosensory and action-related information is associated are scarce. We use the Theory of Event Coding (TEC) as a framework to investigate perception–action integration in the somatosensory-motor domain. Based on studies examining the neural mechanisms underlying stimulus–response binding in the visuo-motor domain, the current study investigates binding mechanisms in the somatosensory-motor domain using EEG signal decomposition and source localization analyses. The present study clearly demonstrates binding between somatosensory stimulus and response features. Importantly, repetition benefits but no repetition costs are evident in the somatosensory modality, which differs from findings in the visual domain. EEG signal decomposition indicates that response selection mechanisms, rather than stimulus-related processes, account for the behavioral binding effects. This modulation is associated with activation differences in the left superior parietal cortex (BA 7), an important relay of sensorimotor integration.

[1]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Neural Underpinnings of Event-file Management: Evidence for Stimulus-induced Activation of and Competition among Stimulus–Response Bindings , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Josep Marco-Pallarés,et al.  Combined ICA-LORETA analysis of mismatch negativity , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  C. Beste,et al.  Physical intensity of stimuli modulates motor inhibition by affecting response selection processes in right inferior frontal regions , 2019, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  C. Beste,et al.  Specific properties of the SI and SII somatosensory areas and their effects on motor control: a system neurophysiological study , 2018, Brain Structure and Function.

[5]  C. Beste,et al.  The impact of stimulus modality on the processing of conflicting sensory information during response inhibition , 2019, Neuroscience.

[6]  Reinout W. Wiers,et al.  Representational precision in visual cortex reveals outcome encoding and reward modulation during action preparation , 2017, NeuroImage.

[7]  B. Hommel How much attention does an event file need? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Christian Frings,et al.  It's the Other Way Around! Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Christian Beste,et al.  Stimulus-response recoding during inhibitory control is associated with superior frontal and parahippocampal processes , 2019, NeuroImage.

[10]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[11]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  B. Hommel,et al.  Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration , 2004 .

[13]  Ann-Kathrin Stock,et al.  Using temporal EEG signal decomposition to identify specific neurophysiological correlates of distractor-response bindings proposed by the theory of event coding , 2020, NeuroImage.

[14]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Connecting EEG signal decomposition and response selection processes using the theory of event coding framework , 2020, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception , 2005 .

[16]  Johan Wessberg,et al.  An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[17]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  A systems neurophysiology approach to voluntary event coding , 2016, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Ionta,et al.  Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: Opportunities for rehabilitation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  B. Hommel,et al.  What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Functional and Neural Mechanism of Action Preparation: Roles of EBA and FFA in Voluntary Action Control , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Beste,et al.  Somatosensory lateral inhibition processes modulate motor response inhibition - an EEG source localization study , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  R. Andersen,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex. , 1989, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[23]  Helge Gillmeister,et al.  ERP investigation of transient attentional selection of single and multiple locations within touch. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Heinrich René Liesefeld,et al.  Combining speed and accuracy to control for speed-accuracy trade-offs(?) , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[25]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[26]  Christian Beste,et al.  Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Werner Sommer,et al.  A toolbox for residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)—A method for the decomposition, reconstruction, and single trial analysis of event related potentials , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Andrea Hildebrandt,et al.  Exploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: A review and comparative evaluation of methods , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[29]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) , 2014, NeuroImage.

[30]  B. Hommel Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  Incongruent Abstract Stimulus–Response Bindings Result in Response Interference: fMRI and EEG Evidence from Visual Object Classification Priming , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE). , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[33]  R. Ackerley,et al.  The role of tactile afference in shaping motor behaviour and implications for prosthetic innovation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  W. Sommer,et al.  Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Christian Beste,et al.  The norepinephrine system shows information-content specific properties during cognitive control – Evidence from EEG and pupillary responses , 2017, NeuroImage.

[36]  C. Beste,et al.  Passive perceptual learning modulates motor inhibitory control in superior frontal regions , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Altered perception-action binding modulates inhibitory control in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. , 2018, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[38]  Jun'ichi Katayama,et al.  Somatosensory P2 reflects resource allocation in a game task: assessment with an irrelevant probe technique using electrical probe stimuli to shoulders. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[39]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Proprioceptive Alignment of Visual and Somatosensory Maps in the Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2007, Current Biology.

[40]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 2001 .

[42]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[43]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neuronal Intra-Individual Variability Masks Response Selection Differences between ADHD Subtypes—A Need to Change Perspectives , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[44]  B. Hommel The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[45]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): a demonstration in go/no-go experiments. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[46]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[47]  Oliver Lindemann,et al.  Expyriment: A Python library for cognitive and neuroscientific experiments , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[48]  Christian Beste,et al.  How perceptual ambiguity affects response inhibition processes. , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  V. Roessner,et al.  Differences in response inhibition processes between adolescents and adults are modulated by sensory processes , 2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neurophysiological processes and functional neuroanatomical structures underlying proactive effects of emotional conflicts , 2018, NeuroImage.

[52]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2.0: Representing and controlling perception and action , 2019, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[53]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neural mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical networks during memory and cue-based task switching as revealed by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) based source localization , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[54]  C. Beste,et al.  On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[55]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[56]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[57]  Christian Beste,et al.  Low and high stimulation frequencies differentially affect automated response selection in the superior parietal cortex – implications for somatosensory area processes , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[58]  C. Beste,et al.  A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour , 2015, Nature Communications.

[59]  M. Fuchs,et al.  A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[60]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .