Phenotypic variation in shell form in the intertidal acorn barnacle Chthamalus montagui: distribution, response to predators and life history trade-offs

[1]  D. Donovan,et al.  Whelks induce an effective defense against sea stars , 2013 .

[2]  Jeremiah N. Jarrett,et al.  Predator-Induced Defense in the Barnacle Chthamalus fissus , 2009 .

[3]  R. Relyea,et al.  Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[4]  J. R. Auld,et al.  Having the guts to compete: how intestinal plasticity explains costs of inducible defences , 2004 .

[5]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment , 2004 .

[6]  Kerry B. Marchinko.  DRAMATIC PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN BARNACLE LEGS (BALANUS GLANDULA DARWIN): MAGNITUDE, AGE DEPENDENCE, AND SPEED OF RESPONSE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  J. Buskirk,et al.  DOSAGE RESPONSE OF AN INDUCED DEFENSE: HOW SENSITIVE ARE TADPOLES TO PREDATION RISK? , 2002 .

[8]  C. D. Harvell,et al.  Specificity of cues inducing defensive spines in the bryozoan Membranipora membranacea , 2002 .

[9]  A. Palmer,et al.  Precise tuning of barnacle leg length to coastal wave action , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Anurag A. Agrawal,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity in the Interactions and Evolution of Species , 2001, Science.

[11]  G. Toth,et al.  Water-borne cues induce chemical defense in a marine alga (Ascophyllum nodosum). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Lively,et al.  Processes structuring communities: evidence for trait‐mediated indirect effects through induced polymorphisms , 2000 .

[13]  C. Lively,et al.  Predator-induced defense : variation for inducibility in an intertidal barnacle , 2000 .

[14]  L. D. Smith,et al.  Induced defensive responses by the bivalve Mytilus edulis to predators with different attack modes , 2000 .

[15]  Stephen J. Hawkins,et al.  Beyond the predation halo: small scale gradients in barnacle populations affected by the relative refuge value of crevices , 1998 .

[16]  Steven D. Gaines,et al.  MAKING MOUNTAINS OUT OF BARNACLES: THE DYNAMICS OF ACORN BARNACLE HUMMOCKING , 1998 .

[17]  O. Reimer,et al.  Phenotypical improvement of morphological defences in the mussel Mytilus edulis induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens , 1996 .

[18]  D. Roff.  The Evolution of Threshold Traits in Animals , 1996, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[19]  G. Trussell.  PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN AN INTERTIDAL SNAIL: THE ROLE OF A COMMON CRAB PREDATOR , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  B. Olsson,et al.  Growth, physiological rates and behaviour of mytilus edulis exposed to the predator Asterias rubens , 1995 .

[21]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Inducible Defenses and the Allocation of Resources: A Minimal Model , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[22]  A. Southward.  Forty Years of Changes in Species Composition and Population Density of Barnacles on a Rocky Shore Near Plymouth , 1991, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[23]  R. Hughes,et al.  Variation in foraging behaviour among individuals and populations of dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus : natural constraints on energy intake , 1991 .

[24]  R. Tollrian,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses , 1990, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[25]  D. Crisp,et al.  The relation between the dimensions of the cirral net, the beat frequency and the size and age of the animal in Balanus balanoides and Elminius modestus , 1990, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[26]  Appleton Rd,et al.  Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod. , 1988 .

[27]  C. Lively.  Canalization Versus Developmental Conversion in a Spatially Variable Environment , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[28]  C. Lively.  COMPETITION, COMPARATIVE LIFE HISTORIES, AND MAINTENANCE OF SHELL DIMORPHISM IN A BARNACLE' , 1986 .

[29]  C. Lively.  PREDATOR‐INDUCED SHELL DIMORPHISM IN THE ACORN BARNACLE CHTHAMALUS ANISOPOMA , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  R. Hughes,et al.  Behavioural components of prey-selection by dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.), feeding on barnacles, Semibalanus balanoides (L.), in the laboratory , 1984 .

[31]  C. Harvell.  Predator-Induced Defense in a Marine Bryozoan , 1984, Science.

[32]  E. Southward,et al.  On the distribution of the intertidal barnacles Chthamalus stellatus, Chthamalus montagui and Euraphia depressa , 1981, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[33]  J. Kitching,et al.  THE ECOLOGY OF LOUGH INE. XV. THE ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF SHELL AND BODY FORMS IN NUCELLA , 1966 .

[34]  T. Norton,et al.  The Ecology of Lough Ine , 1961 .

[35]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  Effects of Competition, Predation by Thais lapillus, and Other Factors on Natural Populations of the Barnacle Balanus balanoides , 1961 .

[36]  Morris H Roberts.  IN THE LABORATORY , 2023 .

[37]  A. Mougi,et al.  Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator–prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology , 2009, Population Ecology.

[38]  Jeremiah N. Jarrett,et al.  INTER-POPULATION VARIATION IN SHELL MORPHOLOGY OF THE BARNACLE CHTHAMALUS FISSUS , 2008 .