The increased use of internal auditing (IA) by client firms leads to the possibility that external auditors will increasingly rely on IA in conducting their audits (Ward and Robertson [1980]), particularly as the quality of IA increases over time. According to Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 9, the decision to rely on IA should be preceded by an evaluation of the IA function: "The independent auditor should acquire an understanding [emphasis added] of the internal audit function as it relates to his study and evaluation of internal accounting control. The work performed by internal auditors may be a factor in determining the nature, timing, and extent of the independent auditor's procedures" (AICPA [1975]). Although SAS No. 9 provides guidelines on the characteristics of IA that might affect auditors' evaluations' and subsequent decisions to rely on clients' IA functions, it does not suggest their relative importance. According to SAS No. 9, the three primary factors affecting the evaluation and reliance decisions are internal auditors' competence, objectivity, and work. The objective of this research was to determine both the extent to which auditors would rely on the IA function, and the relationship between their reliance decisions and their evaluations of IA strength. Included in the investigation was an assessment of the levels of impor-
[1]
Paul R. Brown.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR JUDGMENT IN THE EVALUATION OF INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTIONS
,
1983
.
[2]
A. Rashad Abdel-Khalik,et al.
The Effects of Certain Internal Audit Variables on the Planning of External Audit Programs
,
1983
.
[3]
Bruce L. Stern,et al.
Research for Marketing Decisions
,
1978
.
[4]
S. Addelman.
Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experiments
,
1962
.
[5]
Bruce R. Gaumnitz,et al.
AUDITOR CONSENSUS IN INTERNAL CONTROL EVALUATION AND AUDIT PROGRAM-PLANNING
,
1982
.
[6]
Arnold Schneider,et al.
Modeling External Auditors' Evaluations of Internal Auditing
,
1984
.