An Argumentation Based Approach for Design Change Management in Aerospace Projects

Understanding and managing information contained within large, complex interrelated documents in Aerospace Projects is problematic. Such documents contain vital information regarding business and manufacturing processes. However, some of this information may be incomplete or inconsistent which can have detrimental impacts upon large-scale Aerospace Projects in terms of time and cost. To address such issues this research proposes an argumentation based approach to handle design change management, in which large amounts of information need be effectively and efficiently processed. A use case based within the Aerospace domain has been developed. Furthermore, the areas of argumentation mining, computational semantics and reasoning with uncertainty are explored. The project aims to illustrate the possibility of reducing cognitive and duration effort people are required to exert in order to understand, navigate, search, compare, update, and deliberate on large, complex interrelated documents.

[1]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach , 2003, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

[2]  Ingrid Zukerman,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach for Argument Interpretation , 2004, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[3]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text , 2009, ICAIL.

[4]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Argumentation Based on Classical Logic , 2009, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence.

[5]  Rolf Haenni,et al.  Probabilistic argumentation systems: a new perspective on the dempster‐shafer theory , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[6]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  Semantics and syntax in lexical functional grammar : the resource logic approach , 1999 .

[7]  Rolf Haenni.  Probabilistic argumentation , 2009, J. Appl. Log..

[8]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[9]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Elements of Argumentation , 2007, ECSQARU.

[11]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Decision Making Under Dempster-Shafer Uncertainties , 1992, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[12]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Argumentation in artificial intelligence , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  On the measure of conflicts: Shapley Inconsistency Values , 2010, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  A Logic Programming Framework for Possibilistic Argumentation with Vague Knowledge , 2004, UAI.