The Impact of Participation on Goal Acceptance and Performance: A Two-Step Model

Past research has tested goal setting strategies and found high and invariant levels of goal acceptance. The present research consisted of two studies—one laboratory and one field experiment—hypothesizing a two-step model (participation acceptance performance) with which participation could be tested more effectively. Stepwise, hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that the participative and representative groups outperformed the assigned groups under conditions in which individual goal acceptance varied. The findings support the two-step model and offer an explanation as to why previous research has failed to differentiate empirically between participative and assigned goal setting.

[1]  M Erez,et al.  The role of goal acceptance in goal setting and task performance. , 1983, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[2]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  The effects of holding goal difficulty constant on assigned and participatively set goals. , 1979 .

[3]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates” , 1939 .

[4]  R. Likert,et al.  New Patterns of Management. , 1963 .

[5]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[6]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Organizational Leadership and Participative Management , 1955 .

[7]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. , 1978 .

[8]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[9]  J. Hackman,et al.  Impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans: A field experiment. , 1969 .

[10]  J. French,et al.  Overcoming Resistance to Change , 1948 .

[11]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look , 1979 .

[12]  R. Decharms Personal causation : the internal affective determinants of behavior , 1968 .

[13]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .

[14]  E. A. Locke Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[15]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[16]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Effects of assigned versus participatively set goals, knowledge of results, and individual differences on employee behavior when goal difficulty is held constant. , 1979 .

[17]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[18]  B. Willer,et al.  Client involvement in goal setting and its relationship to therapeutic outcome. , 1976, Journal of clinical psychology.

[19]  Arnold S. Tannenbaum,et al.  Hierarchy in Organizations. , 1975 .

[20]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated woods workers. , 1975 .