Visual cortical correlates of visible persistence

In order to evaluate their possible role in visible persistence, cortical cells from area 17 of the cat were investigated with a stationary light bar flashed for different durations. Thirteen out of 72 cells with non-overlapping On and Off subregions were able to respond to the briefest On stimulus (12.5 msec) for low and moderate contrasts. The responses of these cells outlasted brief On stimuli and this neural persistence increased as the On duration was shortened, mimicking the inverse duration effect of visible persistence. The 30 cells with overlapping On and Off subregions were all able to respond to brief stimuli but their neural persistence was independent of stimulus duration. At very high contrast levels, the inverse duration effect, observed in cells with non-overlapping subregions, disappeared since the On responses were followed by Off rebound discharges regardless of stimulus duration. It is suggested that the latter responses are a possible cortical equivalent of positive afterimages.

[1]  V. Lollo,et al.  Temporal integration following intensification of long-lasting visual displays , 1983, Vision Research.

[2]  Robert K. Moore,et al.  Temporal properties of the human visual nervous system , 1977, Vision Research.

[3]  Electrophysiological correlates of the visual perception of “instantaneous” and “durable” , 1977, Vision Research.

[4]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Contrast enhancement and the negative afterimage. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  G. Orban,et al.  Response to movement of neurons in areas 17 and 18 of the cat: velocity sensitivity. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and optics , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Orientation and spatial frequency effects on linear afterimages , 1973 .

[8]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  Responses of cat visual cortical cells to continuously and stroboscopically illuminated moving light slits compared , 1984, Vision Research.

[9]  G. Poggio,et al.  Excitatory responses of geniculate neurons of the cat. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Kimura,et al.  Convergence of retinal inputs onto visual cortical cells: II. A study of the cells disynaptically excited from the lateral geniculate body , 1977, Brain Research.

[11]  Takehiro Ueno.  Visible persistence: Effects of luminance, spatial frequency and orientation , 1983, Vision Research.

[12]  C. Rashbass.  The visibility of transient changes of luminance , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Binocular interaction fields of single units in the cat striate cortex , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  U T Keesey,et al.  Visibility of a stabilized target as a function of frequency and amplitude of luminance variation. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  William Lovegrove,et al.  Two components to visible persistence: Effects of orientation and contrast , 1981, Vision Research.

[16]  G. Meyer,et al.  Visible persistence as a function of spatial frequency, number of cycles and retinal area , 1984, Vision Research.

[17]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Hypercomplex and simple/complex cell classifications in cat striate cortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  W. Levick,et al.  Responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to brief flashes of light , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  H B BARLOW,et al.  THE ROLE OF AFTERIMAGES IN DARK ADAPTATION. , 1964, Science.

[20]  W. Maguire,et al.  Spatial frequency and the mediation of short-term visual storage , 1977, Science.

[21]  G. Orban,et al.  The influence of eccentricity on receptive field types and orientation selectivity in areas 17 and 18 of the cat , 1981, Brain Research.

[22]  Orientation and spatial frequency effects on linear afterimages: The retinal reference for selectivity — A supplementary report , 1973 .

[23]  Thomas R. Corwin,et al.  Images and afterimages of sinusoidal gratings , 1976, Vision Research.

[24]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Pure central responses from off‐centre cells and pure surround responses from on‐centre cells , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  H Sherk,et al.  Receptive field properties in the cat's area 17 in the absence of on- center geniculate input , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  G. Henry.  Receptive field classes of cells in the striate cortex of the cat , 1977, Brain Research.

[28]  J. Duysens,et al.  Functional basis for the preference for slow movement in area 17 of the cat , 1984, Vision Research.

[29]  P. H. Schiller.  Central connections of the retinal ON and OFF pathways , 1982, Nature.

[30]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[31]  Professor Dr. Guy A. Orban.  Neuronal Operations in the Visual Cortex , 1983, Studies of Brain Function.