TEFIS: A single access point for conducting multifaceted experiments on heterogeneous test facilities

A few years ago, an experimental facility composed of networking gear and simulation tools was sufficient for testing the main features of a prototype before the final product could be launched to the Internet market. This paradigm has certainly changed, but the lack of platforms enabling the realistic assessment of the different facets of a product, including cross-cutting trials across different testbeds, poses strong limitations for researchers and developers. In light of this, we present an open platform that offers a versatile combination of heterogeneous experimental facilities called “TEstbed for Future Internet Services” (TEFIS). TEFIS provides a single access point for conducting cutting-edge experiments on testbeds that supply different capabilities, including testbeds dedicated to network performance, software performance, grid computing, and living labs. We shall show that TEFIS covers the entire life-cycle of a multifaceted experiment, with the advantage that a single testrun can seamlessly execute across different experimental facilities. In order to demonstrate the potential and versatility of the TEFIS platform, we describe the deployment of four distinct experiments and provide a set of results highlighting the benefits of using TEFIS. The experiments described in this article cover: (i) the experimentation with an open API called OPENER (which is an open and programmable environment for managing experimentation with SDN applications); (ii) an application for skiers and tourists at the Megeve ski resort in France; (iii) an application that can dynamically adapt the Quality of Experience (QoE) of multimedia services for mobile users; and (iv) an augmented reality workspace for remote education and learning purposes based on videoconferencing.

[1]  Robert Ricci,et al.  The InstaGENI initiative: An architecture for distributed systems and advanced programmable networks , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[2]  H. Chesbrough Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[3]  Josh Lerner,et al.  When Bureaucrats Meet Entrepreneurs: The Design of Effective 'Public Venture Capital' Programmes , 2002 .

[4]  Byrav Ramamurthy,et al.  The GpENI testbed: Network infrastructure, implementation experience, and experimentation , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[5]  Kristina Groth,et al.  High definition videoconferencing: the future of collaboration in healthcare and education , 2009 .

[6]  Sami Mäkeläinen,et al.  Fixed-Mobile Hybrid Mashups: Applying the REST Principles to Mobile-Specific Resources , 2008, WISE Workshops.

[7]  Gordon S. Blair,et al.  Experiences of using a hybrid cloud to construct an environmental virtual observatory , 2013, CloudDP '13.

[8]  R. Levine Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda , 1999 .

[9]  Symeon Papavassiliou,et al.  A Novel Framework for Dynamic Utility-Based QoE Provisioning in Wireless Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[10]  Philip E. Auerswald,et al.  Valleys of Death and Darwinian Seas: Financing the Invention to Innovation Transition in the United States , 2003 .

[11]  윤창근 해외동향 : Global Environment for Network Innovations(GENI): 미국의 미래 인터넷 전략 , 2010 .

[12]  T. Lawton Missing the target: Assessing the role of government in bridging the European equity gap and enhancing economic growth , 2002 .

[13]  S. Papavassiliou,et al.  User-centric mobile multimedia service delivery: from theory to experimentation to prototyping , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[14]  Krzysztof Kurowski,et al.  Vitrall: Web-Based Distributed Visualization System for Creation of Collaborative Working Environments , 2011, PPAM.

[15]  R. Amit,et al.  Value creation in E‐business , 2001 .

[16]  M. M. Hart,et al.  From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[17]  Jewel H. Ward,et al.  Classifying Implemented Policies and Identifying Factors in Machine-Level Policy Sharing within the integrated Rule-Oriented Data System (iRODS) , 2011 .

[18]  S. Spinelli,et al.  New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[19]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  Future Internet research and experimentation: The G-Lab approach , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[20]  Thomas Dreibholz,et al.  NorNet Core - A multi-homed research testbed , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[21]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Internet Business Models and Strategies , 2000 .

[22]  Prescott C. Ensign,et al.  New Venture Creation , 1994 .

[23]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[24]  Gicheol Wang,et al.  K-GENI testbed deployment and federated meta operations experiment over GENI and KREONET , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[25]  Romina Spalazzese,et al.  A Theory of Mediating Connectors to achieve Interoperability , 2011 .

[26]  Denis Caromel,et al.  ProActive Parallel Suite: From Active Objects-Skeletons-Components to Environment and Deployment , 2009, Euro-Par Workshops.

[27]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[28]  P. Brunn,et al.  e-Marketplaces:: Crafting A Winning Strategy , 2002 .

[29]  Matthew Stafford,et al.  IMS: A New Model for Blending Applications , 2009 .