Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to estimate the ratio of cancers prevented to induced (benefit-risk ratio) for CT colonography (CTC) screening every 5 years from the age of 50 to 80 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS Radiation-related cancer risk was estimated using risk projection models based on the National Research Council's Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII Committee's report and screening protocols from the American College of Radiology Imaging Network's National CT Colonography Trial. Uncertainty intervals were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation methods. Comparative modeling with three colorectal cancer microsimulation models was used to estimate the potential reduction in colorectal cancer cases and deaths. RESULTS The estimated mean effective dose per CTC screening study was 8 mSv for women and 7 mSv for men. The estimated number of radiation-related cancers resulting from CTC screening every 5 years from the age of 50 to 80 years was 150 cases/100,000 individuals screened (95% uncertainty interval, 80-280) for men and women. The estimated number of colorectal cancers prevented by CTC every 5 years from age 50 to 80 ranged across the three microsimulation models from 3580 to 5190 cases/100,000 individuals screened, yielding a benefit-risk ratio that varied from 24:1 (95% uncertainty interval, 13:1-45:1) to 35:1 (19:1-65:1). The benefit-risk ratio for cancer deaths was even higher than the ratio for cancer cases. Inclusion of radiation-related cancer risks from CT examinations performed to follow up extracolonic findings did not materially alter the results. CONCLUSION Concerns have been raised about recommending CTC as a routine screening tool because of potential harms including the radiation risks. Based on these models, the benefits from CTC screening every 5 years from the age of 50 to 80 years clearly outweigh the radiation risks.

[1]  David J Vanness,et al.  Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact. , 2008, Radiology.

[2]  Greg M Galdino,et al.  Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. , 2005, Radiology.

[3]  J. Yee,et al.  CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. , 2005, Radiology.

[4]  Judy Yee,et al.  Dose reduction methods for CT colonography , 2013, Abdominal Imaging.

[5]  H. Nagel,et al.  CT Parameters that Influence the Radiation Dose , 2007 .

[6]  C. Catalano,et al.  Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  D. L. Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 , 2007, Radiation research.

[8]  B. Levin,et al.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[9]  C. Johnson,et al.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[10]  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[11]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  J. Stoker,et al.  Does CT colonography have a role for population-based colorectal cancer screening? , 2012, European Radiology.

[13]  C E Land,et al.  Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation. , 1980, Science.

[14]  H. Nagel,et al.  CT-Expo - ein neuartiges Programm zur Dosisevaluierung in der CT , 2002 .

[15]  M. Macari,et al.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  D. Owens,et al.  State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--3. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[17]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Radiation Effects on Breast Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Cohorts , 2002, Radiation research.

[18]  Richard Wakeford,et al.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. , 2009, Radiology.

[19]  Karen M Horton,et al.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  L. Berland.  Benefits of computed tomography versus risks of radiation for organic gastrointestinal conditions. , 2012, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[21]  James M. Kofler,et al.  Perspective on radiation risk in CT imaging , 2013, Abdominal Imaging.

[22]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  CT colonography of a Medicare-aged population: outcomes observed in an analysis of more than 1400 patients. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  H. Venema,et al.  Radiation dose in CT colonography–trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols , 2008, European Radiology.

[24]  Amy B. Knudsen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  P. Maisonneuve,et al.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[26]  H. Venema,et al.  Effective radiation dose in CT colonography: is there a downward trend? , 2012, Academic radiology.

[27]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology * † , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[28]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[29]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[30]  T. Mang,et al.  CT-Kolonographie in der täglichen Praxis , 2012, Der Radiologe.

[31]  A. Beck,et al.  Multi-slice CT-colonography in low-dose technique--Preliminary results. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[32]  David J Brenner,et al.  Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[33]  Paul Fockens,et al.  Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  Xiaodong Liu,et al.  Biological effects of low-dose radiation from computed tomography scanning , 2013, International journal of radiation biology.

[35]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Screening Computed Tomography Colonography With 256-Slice Scanning: Should Patient Radiation Burden and Associated Cancer Risk Constitute a Major Concern? , 2012, Investigative radiology.