Introducing behavioral change in transportation into energy/economy/environment models

Transportation is vital to economic and social development, but at the same time generates undesired consequences on local, regional, and global scales. One of the largest challenges is the mitigation of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, to which this sector already contributes one-quarter globally and one-third in the United States. Technology measures are the prerequisite for drastically mitigating energy use and all emission species, but they are not sufficient. The resulting need for complementing technology measures with behavioral change policies contrasts sharply with the analyses carried out by virtually all energy / economy / environment (E3) models, given their focus on pure technology-based solutions. This paper addresses the challenges for E3 models to simulate behavioral changes in transportation. A survey of 13 major models concludes that especially hybrid energy models would already be capable of simulating some behavioral change policies, most notably the imposition of the full marginal societal costs of transportation. Another survey of major macroscopic transportation models finds that key specifications required for simulating behavioral change have already been implemented and tested, albeit not necessarily on a global scale. When integrating these key features into E3 models, a wide range of technology and behavioral change policies could be analyzed.

[1]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4 , 2005 .

[2]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Towards General Equilibrium in a Technology-Rich Model with Empirically Estimated Behavioral Parameters , 2006 .

[3]  F. Piontek,et al.  Description of the Remind‐r Model , 2022 .

[4]  K. Small,et al.  Long Run Trends in Transport Demand, Fuel Price Elasticities and Implications of the Oil Outlook for Transport Policy , 2007 .

[5]  Roger Gorham,et al.  AIR POLLUTION FROM GROUND TRANSPORTATION AN ASSESSMENT OF CAUSES, STRATEGIES AND TACTICS, AND PROPOSED ACTIONS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY , 2002 .

[6]  Valerie J. Karplus,et al.  Prospects for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in the United States and Japan: A general equilibrium , 2010 .

[7]  C. Haller,et al.  Made in China , 2013 .

[8]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[9]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Transportation Module of Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM): Model Documentation , 2013 .

[10]  Björn Andersson,et al.  Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints--cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector , 2003 .

[11]  Lew Fulton,et al.  IEA Mobility Model (MoMo) and its use in the ETP 2008 , 2009 .

[12]  A. Schäfer REGULARITIES IN TRAVEL DEMAND: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[13]  Theodoros Zachariadis,et al.  Assessing policies towards sustainable transport in Europe: an integrated model , 2005 .

[14]  St Pye,et al.  MARKAL Macro analysis of long run costs of climate change mitigation targets, Analysis by AEA Energy and Environment , 2007 .

[15]  Jean Charles Hourcade,et al.  Endogenous Structural Change and Climate Targets Modeling Experiments with Imaclim-R , 2006 .

[16]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model : revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results , 2001 .

[17]  Aie Transport Energy and CO2 : Moving towards Sustainability , 2009 .

[18]  A. Schäfer,et al.  The future mobility of the world population , 2000 .

[19]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Biofuels, climate policy and the European vehicle fleet , 2009 .

[20]  M. Fenn,et al.  Nitrogen Emissions, Deposition, and Monitoring in the Western United States , 2003 .

[21]  C. Winston,et al.  Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy: A Handbook in Honor of John R. Meyer , 1999 .

[22]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Technology limits for reducing EU transport sector CO2 emissions. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Jean Charles Hourcade,et al.  Endogenous structural change and climate targets , 2006 .

[24]  N. Wohlgemuth World transport energy demand modelling--methodology and elasticities , 1997 .

[25]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Improving behavioral realism in hybrid energy-economy models using discrete choice studies of personal transportation decisions , 2005 .

[26]  S. E. Ireland Energy Prices and Taxes , 2009 .

[27]  Carol E. Hoffecker,et al.  Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States , 1987 .

[28]  Gunnar Luderer,et al.  Vehicle technologies and shifts in modal split as mitigation options towards a 2 ° C climate target , 2010 .

[29]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Technology detail in a multisector CGE model: Transport under climate policy , 2005 .

[30]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Reducing road congestion: a reality check , 2004 .

[31]  Son H. Kim,et al.  Long-term implications of alternative light-duty vehicle technologies for global greenhouse gas emissions and primary energy demands , 2011 .

[32]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian Topical Issues Paper Reducing road congestion: a reality check—a comment , 2004 .

[33]  J. Weltevreden Substitution or complementarity? How the Internet changes city centre shopping , 2007 .