Evaluation of the PAR Mitigation System in Swiss PWR Containment Using the GOTHIC Code

Abstract The installation of passive autocatalytic recombiners (PARs) in the containment of operating nuclear power plants (NPPs) is increasingly based on three-dimensional studies of severe accidents that accurately predict the hydrogen pathways and local accumulation regions in containment and examine the mitigation effects of the PARs on the hydrogen risk. The GOTHIC (Generation Of Thermal-Hydraulic Information for Containments) code is applied in this paper to study the effectiveness of the PARs installed in the Gösgen NPP in Switzerland. A fast release of a mixture of hydrogen and steam from the hot leg during a total station blackout is chosen as the limiting scenario. The PAR modeling approach is qualified simulating two experiments performed in the frame of the OECD/NEA (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency) THAI (Thermal-hydraulics, Hydrogen, Aerosols and Iodine) project. The results of the plant analyses show that the recombiners cannot prevent the formation of a stratified cloud of hydrogen (10% molar concentration), but they can mitigate the hydrogen accumulation once formed. In the case of the analyzed fast release scenario, which is characterized by increasing loads with large initial flow rate and high hydrogen concentration values, it is shown that, when a large number of recombiners are installed, the global outcome in relation to the combustion risk does not depend on the details of the single PAR behavior. The hydrogen ignition risk can be fully mitigated in a timeframe ranging from 15 to 30 min after the fast release, according to the dependence of the PAR efficiency model on the adopted parameters.

[1]  Mikel Kevin Fernández-Cosials,et al.  Development of a PWR-W GOTHIC 3D model for containment accident analysis , 2016 .

[2]  Stephan Kelm,et al.  OPERATIONAL BEHAVIOUR OF CATALYTIC RECOMBINERS – EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND MODELLING APPROACHES , 2008 .

[3]  T. R. Moffette,et al.  Hydrogen Flammability Data And Application To Pwr Loss-Of-Coolant Accident , 1957 .

[4]  F. Ferroni,et al.  Generic approach for designing and implementing a passive autocatalytic recombiner PAR-system in nuclear power plant containments , 2003 .

[5]  Michele Andreani,et al.  Simulation of gas mixing and transport in a multi-compartment geometry using the GOTHIC containment code and relatively coarse meshes , 2010 .

[6]  Michele Andreani Simulation of Gas Stratification Build-Up in the Containment Under Severe Accident Conditions , 2014 .

[7]  P. Royl,et al.  Analysis of steam and hydrogen distributions with PAR mitigation in NPP containments , 2000 .

[8]  Jürgen Eyink,et al.  Computational validation of the EPR™ combustible gas control system , 2012 .

[9]  Gonzalo Jimenez,et al.  Proposed methodology for Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner sizing and location for a BWR Mark-III reactor containment building , 2016 .

[10]  M. Sonnenkalb,et al.  RE-EVALUATION OF PAR CONCEPT IN GERMAN PWR WITH REVISED PAR MODEL , 2015 .

[11]  Hans-Josef Allelein,et al.  Start-up behaviour of a passive auto-catalytic recombiner under counter flow conditions: Results of a first orienting experimental study , 2014 .

[12]  Michele Andreani,et al.  Synthesis of the OECD/NEA-PSI CFD benchmark exercise , 2016 .

[13]  Vesna Benčik,et al.  Spatial Distribution of Hydrogen in NEK Containment , 2015 .

[14]  Davide Papini,et al.  Hydrogen distribution and Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner (PAR) mitigation in a PWR-KWU containment type , 2017 .