Understanding public responses to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear incidents--driving factors, emerging themes and research gaps.

This paper discusses the management of public responses to incidents involving chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear materials (CBRN). Given the extraordinary technical and operational challenges of a response to a CBRN release including, but not limited to, hazard detection and identification, casualty decontamination and multi-agency co-ordination, it is not surprising that public psychological and behavioural responses to such incidents have received limited attention by scholars and practitioners alike. As a result, a lack of understanding about the role of the public in effective emergency response constitutes a major gap in research and practice. This limitation must be addressed as a CBRN release has the potential to have wide-reaching psychological and behavioural impacts which, in turn, impact upon public morbidity and mortality rates. This paper addresses a number of key issues: why public responses matter; how responses have been conceptualised by practitioners; what factors have been identified as influencing public responses to a CBRN release and similar extreme events, and what further analysis is needed in order to generate a better understanding of public responses to inform the management of public responses to a CBRN release.

[1]  S. Ishimatsu,et al.  The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, Part 1: Community emergency response. , 1998, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[2]  Raluca Cozma.  Source Diversity Increases Credibility of Risk Stories , 2006 .

[3]  Hilary Rhodes,et al.  Trust Influences Response to Public Health Messages During a Bioterrorist Event , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[4]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change , 1983 .

[5]  D. Glik.  Risk communication for public health emergencies. , 2007, Annual review of public health.

[6]  Jamie K. Wardman,et al.  Viewpoint: Terrorism and Dispelling the Myth of a Panic Prone Public , 2006, Journal of public health policy.

[7]  F. Fukuyama.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity Penguin London , 1995 .

[8]  C. Digiovanni,et al.  Domestic terrorism with chemical or biological agents: psychiatric aspects. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[9]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Prediction and Intervention in Health-Related Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Protection Motivation Theory , 2000 .

[10]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[11]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. , 2000 .

[12]  David G. Myers.  Do We Fear the Right Things , 2001 .

[13]  G. Rubin,et al.  Communicating with the Public Following Radiological Terrorism: Results from a Series of Focus Groups and National Surveys in Britain and Germany , 2012, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[14]  M. Stoto,et al.  In their own words: lessons learned from those exposed to anthrax. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[15]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  A psychosocial risk assessment and management framework to enhance response to CBRN terrorism threats and attacks. , 2005, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[16]  Keith J Petrie,et al.  Psychosocial responses to environmental incidents: a review and a proposed typology. , 2006, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[17]  B. M. Vogt,et al.  How Clean is Safe? Improving the Effectiveness of Decontamination of Structures and People Following Chemical and Biological Incidents , 2003 .

[18]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[19]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Communication, Knowledge, and Attitudes: Explaining Reactions to a Technology Perceived as Risky , 1990 .

[20]  S Hinohara,et al.  Sarin poisoning on Tokyo subway. , 1997, Southern medical journal.

[21]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology , 2001 .

[22]  T J Cieslak,et al.  Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological warfare agents. , 1997, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[23]  B. Simons-Morton,et al.  Introduction to Health Education and Health Promotion , 1995 .

[24]  H. Ginzburg,et al.  Consequences of the nuclear power plant accident at Chernobyl. , 1991, Public health reports.

[25]  Lawrence W. Green,et al.  Book Review , 2000 .

[26]  G. Rubin,et al.  The impact of communication materials on public responses to a radiological dispersal device (RDD) attack. , 2013, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[27]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[28]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[29]  D. Krewski,et al.  Public Perception of Terrorism Threats and Related Information Sources in Canada: Implications for the Management of Terrorism Risks , 2006 .

[30]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  G. E. Mccarty,et al.  Investigational drugs and vaccines fielded in support of Operation Desert Storm. , 1992, Military medicine.

[32]  Fred P. Stone.  The Worried Well Response to CBRN Events: Analysis and Solutions , 2012 .

[33]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  B. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Capitol hill staff workers' experiences of bioterrorism: qualitative findings from focus groups. , 2005, Journal of traumatic stress.

[35]  T Okumura,et al.  The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, Part 2: Hospital response. , 1998, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[36]  Z. Solomon,et al.  Israeli psychological casualties of the Persian Gulf war: characteristics, therapy, and selected issues. , 1991, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[37]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  “A 30% Chance of Rain Tomorrow”: How Does the Public Understand Probabilistic Weather Forecasts? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[38]  Steven M Becker,et al.  Emergency communication and information issues in terrorist events involving radioactive materials. , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[39]  Kim Harrison,et al.  Public perceptions and risk communications for botulism. , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[40]  R. Pinder,et al.  Public information needs after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 in London: cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative analysis , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  John H. Sorensen,et al.  Hazard Warning Systems: Review of 20 Years of Progress , 2000 .

[42]  Wendy J Volkland.  How Clean is Safe , 2000 .

[43]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[44]  Vincent T. Covello,et al.  Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the commnication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting , 2001, Journal of Urban Health.

[45]  Norifumi Ninomiya,et al.  The Chemical Disaster Response System in Japan , 2003, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[46]  V T Covello,et al.  The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[47]  A. Warde,et al.  Recuperating from BSE: The shifting UK institutional basis for trust in food , 2006, Appetite.

[48]  Peter S. Houts,et al.  The Three Mile Island Crisis: Psychological, Social, and Economic Impacts on the Surrounding Population , 2003 .

[49]  N. Luhmann.  Trust and Power , 1979 .

[50]  Kristian Krieger,et al.  Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: The role of risk perception and risk communication , 2007, International review of psychiatry.

[51]  Elizabeth Bridges,et al.  The Sarin Gas Attacks on the Tokyo Subway - 10 years later/Lessons Learned , 2005 .

[52]  A. Mushkatel,et al.  Public Opposition To The Siting Of The High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository: The Importance Of Trust , 1991 .

[53]  S. Wessely,et al.  Public Panic and Morale: Second World War Civilian Responses Re‐examined in the Light of the Current Anti‐terrorist Campaign , 2006 .

[54]  R Shepherd,et al.  What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[55]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Applications workbook to accompany health promotion planning : an educational and ecological approach , 1999 .

[56]  John H. Sorensen,et al.  Interim Report on Lessons Learned from Decontamination Experiences , 2000 .

[57]  Jamie K. Wardman,et al.  The changing nature of communication and regulation of risk in Europe , 2011 .

[58]  T Okumura,et al.  The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, Part 3: National and international responses. , 1998, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[59]  R. Putnam.  Making Democracy Work , 1993 .

[60]  T Okumura,et al.  Report on 640 victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. , 1996, Annals of emergency medicine.

[61]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Why do single event probabilities confuse patients? , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[62]  Allen H. Barton,et al.  Communities in Disaster , 1971 .

[63]  Simon Wessely,et al.  Responding to Chemical, Biological, or Nuclear Terrorrism: The Indirect and Long-Term Health Effects May Present the Greatest Challenge , 2002, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[64]  G. Rubin,et al.  How to reduce the impact of "low-risk patients" following a bioterrorist incident: lessons from SARS, anthrax, and pneumonic plague. , 2010, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[65]  S. Wessely,et al.  Are Londoners prepared for an emergency? A longitudinal study following the London bombings. , 2008, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.