UNLABELLED
A study was performed in a call center that provides billing inquiry services using a 2 x 2 balanced experimental plan for nine consecutive weeks. Two independent variables, temperature and outdoor air supply rate, were combined and introduced to the occupants in a blind intervention approach. The temperature set-points were fixed at 22.5 degrees C and 24.5 degrees C, and outdoor air supply rate at 5 l /s/p and 10 l/s/p. Temperature and outdoor air supply rate had significant interaction effects on worker's talk time (P < 0.001), which means that the effects of temperature on talk time performance were not independent of the effects of outdoor air supply rate or the opposite. Talk time was reduced significantly when the outdoor air supply rate was increased from 5 l /s/p to 10 l/s/p at 24.5 degrees C (P < 0.01); this may be associated with the significant reduction in a principal component factor which includes intensity of dryness, aching eyes and nose-related symptoms (P < 0.01). Decreasing the temperature from 24.5 degrees C to 22.5 degrees C at 10 l /s/p significantly increased talk time (P < 0.01). Analysis of the principal component factor based on the neurobehavioral symptoms also revealed that temperature reduction led to an increased mean factor score of these symptoms (P < 0.04).
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
For moderately complex office work which involves manipulation dexterity such as a call center operation where call operators interact with computer-based information systems, tropically acclimatized workers' performance could be improved by increasing the outdoor air supply rate from 5 l/s/p to 10 l/s/p if the temperature is to be maintained at the higher band of the thermal comfort range, around 24.5 degrees C. At a low ventilation rate (5 l/s/p), decreasing the temperature from 24.5 degrees C to 22.5 degrees C (which is a commonly adopted set-point in tropical office buildings) also leads to improvement of talk time performance. The magnitude of talk time improvement was greater by more than four times when the strategy to increase the outdoor air supply rate was implemented at a lower range of outdoor air supply rate (5-10 l /s/p) as compared to the higher range (9.8-22.7 l/s/p).
[1]
P Wargocki,et al.
Effects of pollution from personal computers on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms and productivity in offices.
,
2004,
Indoor air.
[2]
P. Fanger,et al.
The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity.
,
2000,
Indoor air.
[3]
Jorma Railio,et al.
The effect of air temperature on labour productivity in call centres—a case study
,
2002
.
[4]
S C Sekhar,et al.
Indoor air quality and energy performance of air-conditioned office buildings in Singapore.
,
2003,
Indoor air.
[5]
David Peter Wyon.
Documented indoor environmental effects on productivity
,
1998
.
[6]
P. Fanger,et al.
Impact of Temperature and Humidity on the Perception of Indoor Air Quality
,
1998
.
[7]
D K Milton,et al.
Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints.
,
2000,
Indoor air.
[8]
P Wargocki,et al.
Subjective perceptions, symptom intensity and performance: a comparison of two independent studies, both changing similarly the pollution load in an office.
,
2002,
Indoor air.
[9]
P O Fanger,et al.
Indoor air quality in the 21st century: search for excellence.
,
2000,
Indoor air.
[10]
P Wargocki,et al.
Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads.
,
1999,
Indoor air.