Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Superior detection and rejection of 1 versus another class of items during recognition is called the mirror effect. Some mirror effects may involve strategic criterion adjustments based on item distinctiveness and its relation to memorability. Three experiments demonstrated mirror effects for known versus unknown scenes and 1 suggested a similar pattern for faces. In opposition to preexperimental familiarity, lures from known and frequently encountered locations were confidently rejected more often than unknown lures. Forgetting and speeding recognition reversed this lure response pattern, suggesting abandonment of strategic adjustment in favor of a single fixed criterion. With sufficient response time and recent encoding, observers demand more evidence for conceptually distinctive items, perhaps because such items typically foster vivid recollection during retrieval.

[1]  A. Benjamin,et al.  Distractor plausibility and criterion placement in recognition , 2004 .

[2]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  R. Hunt,et al.  Accessing the particular from the general: The power of distinctiveness in the context of organization , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. , 1998, Psychological review.

[5]  W. Hockley,et al.  Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  R. Greene.  Recognition memory for pseudowords , 2004 .

[7]  Michael A. Skelly,et al.  “Nonparametric”A’ and other modern misconceptions about signal detection theory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[9]  R. Guttentag,et al.  Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[10]  G. Bower,et al.  A propositional theory of recognition memory , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[11]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Decision processes in recognition memory: criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Chantel S Prat,et al.  Memory for Star Trek: the role of prior knowledge in recognition revisited. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  J. Wixted.  Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  L. Reder,et al.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  John T Wixted,et al.  On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[17]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention , 1989 .

[18]  R. Guttentag,et al.  Recollection-Based Recognition: Word Frequency Effects , 1997 .

[19]  J. Gardiner,et al.  Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Memorability, Word Frequency and Negative Recognition* , 1977 .

[21]  J. Gardiner,et al.  Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[23]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[24]  L. Reder,et al.  A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition , 2003 .

[25]  Aaron S. Benjamin,et al.  Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[26]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment? , 1955, Psychological review.