Open standards and the role of politics

A necessary part of digital government is the use of standards that allow for technologies to interconnect and interoperate. A growing debate among the technical and policy community is whether governments should provide preferential treatment to open standards over de facto or proprietary standards. In this paper, we discuss our preliminary research into open standards. A core finding is that scholars and policymakers need to recognize the role of politics at many phases from the development to the adoption of open standards. By focusing on the role of politics, we are able to offer a number of useful proposals for addressing issues around open standards.

[1]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[2]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[3]  Dave Crocker,et al.  Making standards the IETF way , 1993, STAN.

[4]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[5]  Mark A. Lemley.  Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations , 2002 .

[6]  J. West,et al.  The Economic Realities of Open Standards : Black , White and Many Shades of Gray Joel West , 2005 .

[7]  P. Trubowitz,et al.  “Going Bipartisan”: Politics by Other Means , 2005 .

[8]  H. Varian,et al.  The Art of Standards Wars , 1999 .

[9]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[10]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the web , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[12]  Gregory Tassey,et al.  Underinvestment in Public Good Technologies , 2004 .

[13]  Erik Huizer,et al.  IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures , 1994, RFC.

[14]  J. Mccormick,et al.  Bipartisanship, Partisanship, and Ideology in Congressional-Executive Foreign Policy Relations, 1947-1988 , 1990, The Journal of Politics.

[15]  Ken Krechmer.  The Meaning of Open Standards , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Andrew Updegrove,et al.  Standard setting and consortium structures , 1995, STAN.

[17]  Rajiv C. Shah,et al.  Manipulating the Governance Characteristics of Code , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[18]  John Hasnas.  Back to the Future: From Critical Legal Studies Forward to Legal Realism, Or How Not to Miss the Point of the Indeterminacy Argument , 1995 .

[19]  Timothy S. Simcoe.  Committees and the Creation of Technical Standards ∗ , 2003 .

[20]  Paul A. David,et al.  Economics of compatibility standards and competition in telecommunication networks , 1994 .

[21]  Elliot Maxwell,et al.  Open Standards, Open Source, and Open Innovation: Harnessing the Benefits of Openness , 2006, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.