Three-Dimensional Dynamo Waves In a Sphere

The term dynamo wave was introduced by Parker to describe oscillatory solutions of the mean field induction equation containing differential rotation and an f -effect from helicity. In this article, we examine dynamo waves generated by a class of steady, three-dimensional flows in a sphere without using the mean-field approximation. The flows are defined by two parameters: D the differential rotation, and M the meridional circulation. Contrary to expectations based on the mean-field equations, most 3-dimensional solutions are stationary. Dynamo waves occupy a very narrow band in the parameter space of flows. They behave like solutions to the mean-field equations in three important ways: the magnetic Reynolds number approaches the asymptotic value, meridional circulation produces steady solutions, and radial and azimuthal components of flux tend to occupy the same region of the sphere. The last observation explains why steady solutions, in which radial and azimuthal flux occupy different parts of the sphere, dominate in 3-dimensions: the third dimension facilitates the separation of the two components. This kinematic result may apply to dynamical solutions in which any change in flow that tends to concentrate radial and azimuthal field in the same place leads to oscillations or reversal. This is a possible mechanism by which the Earth's magnetic field reverses.

[1]  C. Jones,et al.  A convection driven geodynamo reversal model , 1999 .

[2]  D. Gubbins,et al.  Kinematic dynamo action in a sphere. II. Symmetry selection , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  H. K. Moffatt.  Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids , 1978 .

[4]  D. Gubbins,et al.  Kinematic dynamo action in a sphere. I. Effects of differential rotation and meridional circulation on solutions with axial dipole symmetry , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  M. Proctor.  On the eigenvalues of kinematic α‐effect dynamos , 1977 .

[6]  P. Roberts,et al.  A three-dimensional kinematic dynamo , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  Eugene N. Parker,et al.  Cosmical Magnetic Fields: Their Origin and their Activity , 2019 .

[8]  S. Gibbons.  The Parker–Levy reversal mechanism , 1998 .

[9]  D. Gubbins,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos dominated by strong differential rotation , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  M. Steenbeck,et al.  Zur Dynamotheorie stellarer und planetarer Magnetfelder I. Berechnung sonnenähnlicher Wechselfeldgeneratoren , 1969 .

[11]  D. Gubbins,et al.  Geomagnetic field morphologies from a kinematic dynamo model , 1994, Nature.

[12]  E. Levy.  Kinematic reversal schemes for the geomagnetic dipole. , 1972 .

[13]  E. Parker.  Hydromagnetic Dynamo Models , 1955 .

[14]  S. I. Braginskii.  KINEMATIC MODELS OF THE EARTH'S HYDROMAGNETIC DYNAMO , 1964 .

[15]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  Kinematic dynamo models , 1972, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[16]  M. Proctor.  The role of mean circulation in parity selection by planetary magnetic fields , 1977 .

[17]  P. Roberts,et al.  Small Amplitude Solutions of the Dynamo Problem , 1991 .

[18]  D. Gubbins,et al.  Kinematic magnetic-field morphology at the core-mantle boundary , 1994 .