An examination of interactions in a three-dimensional virtual world

Three-dimensional (3D) virtual worlds hold the users' attention by providing rich interaction in an environment similar to the real world. User engagement duration is known to increase in environments with intense interaction. However, information in the literature about whether gender, experience, or spatial ability affects interaction in these environments is limited. In this study, these three factors are compared to users' depth of interaction in a 3D virtual world. In addition, the relationships between engagement duration, spatial ability, and depth of interaction are examined to investigate whether the first two factors can predict the third. Findings showed that users' depth of interaction was not influenced by gender, but experience and spatial ability did affect interaction. A strong relationship was determined between depth of interaction and engagement duration, and a moderate relationship was found between depth of interaction and spatial ability. Findings indicated that when designing 3D environments, it is important to consider which kinds of tasks provide more interaction and to what extent spatial abilities affect interaction, as well as to prepare activities that will increase engagement duration and to devise strategies to enhance depth of interaction. Depth of interaction was affected by experience and spatial ability.Strong relationship was found between depth of interaction and engagement duration.Moderate relationship was found between interaction and spatial ability.Engagement duration alone explains 20% of the users' depth of interaction.Spatial ability together with engagement duration explains 36% of interaction.

[1]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  Gender and Computer Games: Exploring Females' Dislikes , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  James H. McMillan,et al.  Research in Education: Evidence Based Inquiry , 2005 .

[3]  Carla Maria Dal Sasso Freitas,et al.  Cooperative object manipulation in immersive virtual environments: framework and techniques , 2002, VRST '02.

[4]  D. Keegan,et al.  Three Types of Interaction , 2013 .

[5]  Scott E. Caplan,et al.  Who plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profile , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Hakan Tüzün,et al.  ÜÇ-BOYUTLU SANAL ORTAM VE SOMUT MATERYAL KULLANIMININ UZAMSAL YETENEĞE ETKİ LERİ* EFFECTS OF USING THREE-DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS AND CONCRETE MANIPULATIVES ON SPATIAL ABILITY , 2011 .

[7]  Arif Altun,et al.  İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bilgisayar deneyimleri ile uzamsal düşünme ve geometri başarıları arasındaki ilişki , 2003 .

[8]  Meredith Bricken,et al.  Summer Students in Virtual Reality , 1992 .

[9]  I. Jung,et al.  Effects of Different Types of Interaction on Learning Achievement, Satisfaction and Participation in Web-Based Instruction , 2002 .

[10]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Individual motivations and demographic differences in social virtual world uses: An exploratory investigation in Second Life , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[11]  Christina Vasilakis,et al.  The NICE project: learning together in a virtual world , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[12]  Michele D. Dickey.  Brave new (interactive) worlds: A review of the design affordances and constraints of two 3D virtual worlds as interactive learning environments , 2005, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[13]  Mia Liza A. Lustria,et al.  Can interactivity make a difference? Effects of interactivity on the comprehension of and attitudes toward online health content , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Kjell Aleklett,et al.  Problem-Based Distance Learning of Energy Issues via Computer Network. , 1999 .

[15]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  My avatar and me - Gender and personality predictors of avatar-self discrepancy , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Saniye Tugba Bulu,et al.  Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Individual differences in virtual environments-introduction and overview , 2000 .

[18]  Chien Chou,et al.  Gender differences in Taiwan high school students' computer game playing , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG) , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Peter Shea,et al.  Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[21]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .

[22]  Hyewon Chung,et al.  Are Stereotypes Relative to Gender Usage Applicable to Virtual Worlds? , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[24]  Michele D. Dickey.  Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical Affordances and Constraints of 3D Virtual Worlds for Synchronous Distance Learning , 2003 .

[25]  Mia Liza A. Lustria,et al.  Automated criminal link analysis based on domain knowledge: Research Articles , 2007 .

[26]  Li-Chun Wang,et al.  The Effects of Type of Interactivity in Experiential Game-Based Learning , 2009, Edutainment.

[27]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[28]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[29]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Gender Issues in the Use of Virtual Environments , 1999, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  Eric Gordon,et al.  Placeworlds: Using Virtual Worlds to Foster Civic Engagement , 2008 .

[31]  C. Heeter.  Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences , 2000 .

[32]  George D. Kuh.  Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning Inside The National Survey of Student Engagement , 2001 .

[33]  Jong-Chao Hong,et al.  Gender differences in help-seeking and supportive dialogue during on-line game , 2011, ICCE 2011.

[34]  Fethi Calisir,et al.  Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Jang-Han Lee,et al.  Convergent Validity and Sex Differences in Healthy Elderly Adults for Performance on 3D Virtual Reality Navigation Learning and 2D Hidden Maze Tasks , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  Leslie Jarmon,et al.  Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[38]  B. Laeng,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  D. R. Garrison,et al.  An analysis and evaluation of audio teleconferencing to facilitate education at a distance , 1990 .

[40]  Michele D. Dickey.  Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design , 2005 .

[41]  Andreas Dünser,et al.  Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools , 2006, CHINZ '06.

[42]  Michael Tlauka,et al.  Gender differences in spatial knowledge acquired through simulated exploration of a virtual shopping centre , 2005 .

[43]  Douglas A. Bors,et al.  What does the Mental Rotation Test Measure? An Analysis of Item Difficulty and Item Characteristics , 2009 .

[44]  J. Pratt,et al.  Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition , 2007, Psychological science.

[45]  H. Coates.  The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance , 2005 .

[46]  Elizabeth Boyle,et al.  The differences in motivations of online game players and offline game players: A combined analysis of three studies at higher education level , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Atul Sajjanhar,et al.  Virtual Worlds for Student Engagement , 2012 .

[48]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: The role of performance factors , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Readers' Models of Text Structures: The Case of Academic Articles , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[50]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[51]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Factors influencing interaction in an online course , 1999 .

[52]  Lily Shui-Lien Chen,et al.  The impact of perceived risk, intangibility and consumer characteristics on online game playing , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  T. Anderson,et al.  Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction , 1998 .

[54]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[55]  Eleni Stroulia,et al.  Virtual worlds - past, present, and future: New directions in social computing , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[56]  Ming-Puu Chen.  The Effects of Level-of-Interactivity and Gender on Learners' Achievement and Attitude in an E-learning Course on Computer Graphics , 2008 .

[57]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  Even in virtual environments women shop and men build: A social role perspective on Second Life , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[58]  Michael K. Thomas,et al.  Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns , 2005 .

[59]  Rochell R. McWhorter,et al.  A Study of Adult Learning in a Virtual World , 2010 .

[60]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude , 2003 .

[61]  George D. Kuh,et al.  What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement , 2009 .

[62]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[63]  Ahmad Rafi,et al.  Training in Spatial Visualization: The Effects of Training Method and Gender , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[64]  Alan Miller,et al.  Educationally enhanced virtual worlds , 2010, 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[65]  E. A. Attree,et al.  The specificity of memory enhancement during interaction with a virtual environment. , 1999, Memory.

[66]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[67]  Johann Füller,et al.  Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation , 2009 .

[68]  Jorge Trindade,et al.  Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[69]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Real and Illusory Interactions Enhance Presence in Virtual Environments , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[70]  Enrique P. Becerra,et al.  Ugly Duckling by Day, Super Model by Night: The Influence of Body Image on the Use of Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[71]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Spatial updating of virtual displays , 2004 .

[72]  Malaika Brengman,et al.  A motivation-based typology of social virtual world users , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[73]  Tony M. O'Driscoll,et al.  Learning in 3D: Adding a New Dimension to Enterprise Learning and Collaboration , 2010 .

[74]  P. Thompson.  The Influence of Popular Culture and Entertainment Media on Adult Education , 2007 .

[75]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[76]  Katherine G. Franceschi-Diaz.  Group presence in virtual worlds: Supporting collaborative e-learning , 2008 .

[77]  Mehmet Firat.  Learning in 3D virtual worlds and current situation in Turkey , 2010 .

[78]  Khaled Sabry,et al.  Web-based learning interaction and learning styles , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[79]  Justin B. Hollander,et al.  Commentary: Virtual Planning , 2009 .

[80]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Digital game-based learning , 2000, CIE.

[81]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Don't bother me, Mom, I'm learning! , 2006 .

[82]  Michael T. Battista,et al.  Spatial Visualization, Formal Reasoning, and Geometric Problem-Solving Strategies of Preservice Elementary Teachers. , 1989 .

[83]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  What does virtual reality NEED?: human factors issues in the design of three-dimensional computer environments , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[84]  Jie-Chi Yang,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Playing Time by Different Genders and Ages in an MMORPG , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference On Digital Game And Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning.

[85]  Zahira Merchant,et al.  Exploring 3-D virtual reality technology for spatial ability and chemistry achievement , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[86]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[87]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[88]  Natasha F. Veltri,et al.  Gender Differences in Online Gaming: A Literature Review , 2014, AMCIS.

[89]  Kursat Cagiltay,et al.  Flow experiences of children in an interactive social game environment , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..