An evaluation of the global potential of bioenergy production on degraded lands

In this article the global potential of energy crop production on degraded lands was estimated using detailed, spatially explicit data about the area, type and extent of degradation derived from the Global Assessment of Land Degradation Dataset, and by combining this dataset with various spatially explicit data sets. Next, an estimate was made of the possible yield of perennial energy crops on the degraded areas as a function of the type and degree of degradation. Lightly degraded areas were not included, as these areas might be suitable for conventional food production. The total global potential energy production on degraded lands was assessed to be slightly above 150 and 190 EJ yr−1, for grassy and woody energy crops, respectively. Most of this potential, however, is on areas currently classified as forest, cropland or pastoral land, leaving a potential of around 25 and 32 EJ yr−1 on other land cover categories. Most of the potential energy crop production on degraded land is located in developing regions. China has a total potential of 30 EJ yr−1, of which 4 EJ yr−1 from areas classified as other land. Also USA, Brazil, West Africa, East Africa, Russia and India have substantial potentials of 12–18 EJ yr−1, with up to 30% of the potential from areas classified as other land.

[1]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  The global technical and economic potential of bioenergy from salt-affected soils , 2011 .

[2]  A. Faaij,et al.  Bioenergy revisited: Key factors in global potentials of bioenergy , 2010 .

[3]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints , 2009 .

[4]  A. Hastings,et al.  Future energy potential of Miscanthus in Europe , 2009 .

[5]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Contribution of N2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first‐generation biofuels , 2009 .

[6]  Christopher B Field,et al.  The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Paul R. Adler,et al.  Perennial Forages as Second Generation Bioenergy Crops , 2008, International journal of molecular sciences.

[8]  I. Lewandowski,et al.  Comparing annual and perennial energy cropping systems with different management intensities , 2008 .

[9]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[10]  A. Hector Faculty Opinions recommendation of Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. , 2008 .

[11]  R. Perrin,et al.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  A. Bouwman,et al.  Mapping contemporary global cropland and grassland distributions on a 5 × 5 minute resolution , 2007 .

[13]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs , 2007 .

[14]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[15]  V. Owens,et al.  Management of Switchgrass-Dominated Conservation Reserve Program Lands for Biomass Production in South Dakota , 2006 .

[16]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands , 2006 .

[17]  J. Fike,et al.  The Biology and Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels , 2005 .

[18]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[19]  F. Achard,et al.  A Synthesis of Information on Rapid Land-cover Change for the Period 1981–2000 , 2005 .

[20]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water , 2004 .

[21]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar I. Clonal differences in leaf characteristics in relation to biomass production , 2004 .

[22]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy , 2003 .

[23]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Cold Tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus × giganteus: Adaptation in Amounts and Sequence of C4 Photosynthetic Enzymes1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[24]  R. Antil,et al.  Soil Degradation as a Threat to Food Security , 2002 .

[25]  V. R. Tolbert,et al.  Changes in soil quality and below-ground carbon storage with conversion of traditional agricultural crop lands to bioenergy crop production. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[26]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  The energy crop growth model SILVA: Description and application to Eucalyptus plantations in Nicaragua. , 2001 .

[27]  James W. Fyles,et al.  Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec , 2001 .

[28]  D. J. Nixon,et al.  The potential for short rotation energy forestry on restored landfill caps. , 2001, Bioresource technology.

[29]  Reinhard F. Hüttl,et al.  Production of biomass for energy in post-mining landscapes and nutrient dynamics , 2001 .

[30]  C. W. Wood,et al.  Soil management impacts on soil carbon sequestration by switchgrass , 2000 .

[31]  Jan Beyea,et al.  Bioenergy in the United States: progress and possibilities 1 1 Based on the final report for NREL Su , 2000 .

[32]  V. R. Tolbert,et al.  Soil Sustainability in Renewable Biomass Plantings , 2000 .

[33]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data , 2000 .

[34]  J. Morison,et al.  Water use efficiency of C4 perennial grasses in a temperate climate , 1999 .

[35]  P. Börjesson Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—I: Identification and quantification , 1999 .

[36]  S. Archibald,et al.  Identifying agricultural sites for biomass energy production in Minnesota , 1998 .

[37]  David C. Ditsch,et al.  A review of soil erosion potential associated with biomass crops , 1998 .

[38]  R. Lal Methods for Assessment of Soil Degradation , 1997 .

[39]  S. B. McLaughlin,et al.  Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. , 1995 .

[40]  R. Leemans,et al.  Determining the potential distribution of vegetation, crops and agricultural productivity , 1994 .

[41]  Jeremy Woods,et al.  Biomass for energy: supply prospects. , 1993 .

[42]  R. Houghton,et al.  Current land cover in the tropics and its potential for sequestering carbon , 1993 .

[43]  T. Ranney,et al.  Comparative drought resistance among six species of birch (Betula): influence of mild water stress on water relations and leaf gas exchange , 1991 .

[44]  D. Tirpak,et al.  Policy Options For Stabilizing Global Climate , 1990 .

[45]  M. Ettala Short-Rotation Tree Plantations At Sanitary Landfills , 1988 .

[46]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Bioenergy - A Sustainable and Reliable Energy Source , 2010 .

[47]  D. Dent,et al.  How good is GLASOD? , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Global assessment of land degradation and improvement: 1. Identification by remote sensing , 2008 .

[49]  D. P. van Vuuren,et al.  Local and global consequences of the EU renewable directive for biofuels: testing the sustainability criteria , 2008 .

[50]  Michael Masters Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs , 2008 .

[51]  Frederick Maurice Slater,et al.  Ground flora, small mammal and bird species diversity in miscanthus (Miscanthus×giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields , 2007 .

[52]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context , 2007 .

[53]  E. Salentijn,et al.  Crop Platforms for cell wall biorefining : lignocellulose feedstocks , 2007 .

[54]  Dželetović Željko,et al.  Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop , 2007 .

[55]  M. Busse,et al.  Compaction Alters Physical but Not Biological Indices of Soil Health , 2005 .

[56]  R. Lal,et al.  Impact of soil erosion on crop yields in North America , 2001 .

[57]  R. Leemans,et al.  Global change scenarios of the 21st Century : results from the IMAGE 2.1 model , 1998 .

[58]  E. Hansen Soil carbon sequestration beneath hybrid poplar plantations in the North Central United States , 1993 .

[59]  T. Logan Chemical degradation of soil. , 1990 .

[60]  G.S.V. Raghavan,et al.  Soil Compaction in Agriculture: A View Toward Managing the Problem , 1990 .

[61]  C. Mullins,et al.  Hardsetting Soils: Behavior, Occurrence, and Management , 1990 .

[62]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil Wetness and Anaerobiosis , 1990 .

[63]  R. Lal Soil Erosion and Land Degradation: The Global Risks , 1990 .

[64]  L. R. Oldeman,et al.  World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: an explanatory note. , 1990 .

[65]  Alan Grainger,et al.  ESTIMATING AREAS OF DEGRADED TROPICAL LANDS REQUIRING REPLENISHMENT OF FOREST COVER , 1988 .

[66]  W. M. Dawson,et al.  Biomass from short-rotation coppice willow on marginal land , 1986 .