Light distribution and foliage structure in an oak canopy

Abstract Leaf angle distribution and shoot bifurcation ratio were measured and related to photon flux density (PFD) distribution in an oak canopy. Leaf angle distribution deviated substantially from random and changed markedly throughout the canopy. The observed leaf angle distribution was described by an ellipsoidal function with the single parameter of the distribution, x, changing from 1.6 at the top of the canopy to 3.2 in the lowest branches. In vertically homogeneous canopies, the extinction coefficient for diffuse radiation is expected to decline with increasing leaf area index (LAI). However, in the canopy studied here, the leaf angle distribution changed with height such that the effective extinction coefficient remained constant. Both shoot bifurcation ratio and leaf number per shoot declined with decreasing PFD inside the canopy. Based on these observed relationships, a simple canopy growth model that assumes horizontal homogeneity of the canopy was constructed. Calculations showed that a steady state, when growth in the upper of the canopy is in equilibrium with decline of lower canopy, the total canopy LAI should equal to 4.3. This predicted value of equilibrium LAI is larger than that estimated from measurements of PFD transmission (LAI=3.3), but smaller than that directly determined by litter collection (LAI=6.2 in 1998). Possible reasons for these discrepancies are discussed.

[1]  John D. Aber,et al.  FOLIAGE-HEIGHT PROFILES AND SUCCESSION IN NORTHERN HARDWOOD FORESTS' , 1979 .

[2]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Plant Architecture and Resource Competition , 1987 .

[3]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Distribution of leaf photosynthetic properties in tree canopies : comparison of species with different shade tolerance , 1998 .

[4]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective , 1988 .

[5]  M. Huston,et al.  A comparison of direct and indirect methods for estimating forest canopy leaf area , 1991 .

[6]  Thomas M. Hinckley,et al.  THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF BRANCH AUTONOMY , 1991 .

[7]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Variations in leaf morphometry and nitrogen concentration in Betula pendula Roth., Corylus avellana L. and Lonicera xylosteum L. , 1993, Tree physiology.

[8]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  The bare bones of leaf-angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange , 1988 .

[9]  A. Noormets,et al.  Seasonal changes in leaf nitrogen pools in two Salix species. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[10]  J. Reynolds,et al.  The Influence of Carbon Dioxide and Daily Photon-flux Density on Optimal Leaf Nitrogen Concentration and Root: Shoot Ratio , 1991 .

[11]  J. Bockheim,et al.  Biomass, net primary production and nutrient distribution for an age sequence of Populus tremuloides ecosystems , 1988 .

[12]  G. Campbell.  Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution , 1986 .

[13]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function: The description and measurement of plant canopy structure , 1989 .

[14]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Canopy radiative transfer models for spherical and known leaf inclination angle distributions: a test in an oak-hickory forest , 1985 .

[15]  E. D. Ford,et al.  The Leaf Canopy of a Coppiced Deciduous Woodland: I. Development and Structure , 1971 .

[16]  J. M. Norman,et al.  THE ARCHITECTURE OF A DECIDUOUS FOREST CANOPY IN EASTERN TENNESSEE, U.S.A. , 1986 .

[17]  P. Ramakrishnan,et al.  GROWTH STRATEGY OF TREES RELATED TO SUCCESSIONAL STATUS I. ARCHITECTURE AND EXTENSION GROWTH , 1982 .

[18]  ESTIMATING CANOPY STRUCTURE OF AN OAK FOREST AT SEVERAL SCALES , 1989 .

[19]  G. Russell,et al.  Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function: Canopies as populations , 1989 .

[20]  S. T. Gower,et al.  A comparison of optical and direct methods for estimating foliage surface area index in forests , 1994 .

[21]  D. Clark,et al.  Long-term study of solar radiation regimes in a tropical wet forest using quantum sensors and hemispherical photography , 1993 .

[22]  Serge Collineau,et al.  2 – The Physical Nature of Solar Radiation in Heterogeneous Canopies: Spatial and Temporal Attributes , 1994 .

[23]  J. Chen,et al.  Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand , 1991 .

[24]  S. Pickett,et al.  BRANCHING PATTERNS IN FOREST SHRUBS AND UNDERSTORY TREES IN RELATION TO HABITAT , 1980 .

[25]  J. Ross.  The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands , 1981, Tasks for vegetation sciences 3.

[26]  C. Messier,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in the light environment of developing Scots pine stands: the basis for a quick and efficient method of characterizing light , 1995 .

[27]  T. Nilson.  A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands , 1971 .

[28]  Margaret C. Anderson.  Stand Structure and Light Penetration. II. A Theoretical Analysis , 1966 .

[29]  T. McMahon,et al.  Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Canopy light transmittance in a chronosequence of mixed-species deciduous forests , 1994 .

[31]  Rongling Wu.  Simulated optimal structure of a photosynthetic system: implication for the breeding of forest crop ideotype , 1993 .

[32]  Bart Kruijt,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthesis to light: a mechanistic approach , 1999 .

[33]  P. G. Jarvis,et al.  Productivity of temperate de-ciduous and evergreen forests , 1983 .

[34]  Prof. Dr. Francis Hallé,et al.  Tropical Trees and Forests , 1978, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.