Sensitivity recovery for the AX-PET prototype using inter-crystal scattering events

The development of novel detection devices and systems such as the AX-positron emission tomography (PET) demonstrator often introduce or increase the measurement of atypical coincidence events such as inter-crystal scattering (ICS). In more standard systems, ICS events often go undetected and the small measured fraction may be ignored. As the measured quantity of such events in the data increases, so too does the importance of considering them during image reconstruction. Generally, treatment of ICS events will attempt to determine which of the possible candidate lines of response (LoRs) correctly determine the annihilation photon trajectory. However, methods of assessment often have low success rates or are computationally demanding. In this investigation alternative approaches are considered. Experimental data was taken using the AX-PET prototype and a NEMA phantom. Three methods of ICS treatment were assessed--each of which considered all possible candidate LoRs during image reconstruction. Maximum likelihood expectation maximization was used in conjunction with both standard (line-like) and novel (V-like in this investigation) detection responses modeled within the system matrix. The investigation assumed that no information other than interaction locations was available to distinguish between candidates, yet the methods assessed all provided means by which such information could be included. In all cases it was shown that the signal to noise ratio is increased using ICS events. However, only one method, which used full modeling of the ICS response in the system matrix--the V-like model--provided enhancement in all figures of merit assessed in this investigation. Finally, the optimal method of ICS incorporation was demonstrated using data from two small animals measured using the AX-PET demonstrator.

[1]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  The AX-PET demonstrator—Design, construction and characterization , 2011 .

[2]  Bernd J Pichler,et al.  Latest Advances in Molecular Imaging Instrumentation , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  S. Cherry,et al.  A study of inter-crystal scatter in small scintillator arrays designed for high resolution PET imaging , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[4]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  Inclusion of Inter Crystal Scatter data in PET , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[5]  William W. Moses,et al.  Algorithms to identify detector Compton scatter in PET modules , 1996 .

[6]  F. H. González Inter-crystal scatter in positron emission tomography: Identification techniques and effects on reconstructed images for AX-PET demonstrator , 2012 .

[7]  A Fenster,et al.  A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for finite-element differentiation. , 1987, Medical physics.

[8]  Guillem Pratx,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of photon interaction sequences for high-resolution PET detectors , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  P. Weilhammer,et al.  AX-PET: A novel PET concept with G-APD readout , 2012 .

[10]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Inter-crystal scatter in a dual layer, high resolution LSO-APD positron emission tomograph. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  I. Buvat,et al.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Sensitivity in PET: Neural networks as an alternative to compton photons LOR analysis , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  R. Siddon Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[14]  V Sossi,et al.  Simulations of a micro-PET system based on liquid xenon , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  P Solevi,et al.  Simulated one-pass list-mode: an approach to on-the-fly system matrix calculation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Guillem Pratx,et al.  Effects of multiple-interaction photon events in a high-resolution PET system that uses 3-D positioning detectors. , 2010, Medical physics.

[17]  M. Rafecas,et al.  Image reconstruction for AX-PET: different approaches to histograming for semi-continuous data , 2011 .

[18]  U Ruotsalainen,et al.  A Monte-Carlo based model of the AX-PET demonstrator and its experimental validation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  T. Budinger Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  DOI-based reconstruction algorithms for a compact breast PET scanner. , 2011, Medical physics.