Spatial versus temporal grouping in a modified Ternus display

The Ternus display can induce a percept of 'element motion' or 'group motion'. Conventionally, this has been attributed to two different motion processes, with different spatial and temporal ranges. In contrast, recent studies have emphasised spatial and temporal grouping principles as underlying the apparent motion percepts in the Ternus display. The present study explored effects of spatial and temporal grouping on the apparent motion percept in a novel Ternus display of oriented Gabor elements with no inter-frame interval. Each frame of this stimulus could be further divided into 'sub-frames', and the orientation of the carriers was changed across these sub-frames. In four experiments transitions were found between the motion percepts with changes in orientation across time (Experiment 1) and space (Experiment 2), and with a temporal offset in the orientation change of the outer element (Experiment 3) to the extent that group motion was not perceived even with large orientation changes over time that previously led to group motion (Experiment 4). Collectively, these results indicate that while spatial properties have an influence in determining the percept of the Ternus display, temporal properties also have a strong influence, and can override spatial grouping. However, these temporal effects cannot be attributed to spatio-temporal limits of low-level motion processes. Some aspects of the observed spatial grouping effects can be accounted for in terms of a modified association field, which may occur through connectivity of orientation selective units in V1. The temporal effects observed are considered in terms of temporal integration, the transitional value at a temporal offset of 40ms being remarkably similar to psychophysical and neurophysiological estimates of the peak temporal impulse response. These temporal responses could be detected at a higher level in the system, providing a basis for apparent motion perception.

[1]  C. von der Malsburg.  The what and why of binding: the modeler's perspective. , 1999, Neuron.

[2]  J Timothy Petersik,et al.  The Evolution of Explanations of a Perceptual Phenomenon: A Case History Using the Ternus Effect , 2006, Perception.

[3]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Orientation Selectivity of the Human Visual System as a Function of Retinal Eccentricity and Visual Hemifield , 1981, Perception.

[4]  C. Gray,et al.  Dynamics of striate cortical activity in the alert macaque: II. Fast time scale synchronization. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding , 1995, Vision Research.

[6]  Josef Ternus,et al.  The problem of phenomenal identity. , 1938 .

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  Two-dimensional spatial and spatial-frequency selectivity of motion-sensitive mechanisms in human vision. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  J. Timothy Petersik,et al.  Factors controlling the competing sensations produced by a bistable stroboscopic motion display , 1979, Vision Research.

[9]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  Contrast Configuration Influences Grouping in Apparent Motion , 2005, Perception.

[10]  Terry Caelli,et al.  Discrimination thresholds in the two-dimensional spatial frequency domain , 1983, Vision Research.

[11]  R. Hess,et al.  Estimating multiple temporal mechanisms in human vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[12]  A Pantle,et al.  A multistable movement display: evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision. , 1976, Science.

[13]  S. Yantis,et al.  Perceptual grouping in space and time: Evidence from the Ternus display , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J P Thomas,et al.  Bandwidths of orientation channels in human vision. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Neuromagnetic Responses to Frequency-Tagged Sounds: A New Method to Follow Inputs from Each Ear to the Human Auditory Cortex during Binaural Hearing , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  O J Braddick,et al.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  D Regan,et al.  Independence of orientation and size in spatial discriminations. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Orientation dependent modulation of apparent speed: psychophysical evidence , 2002, Vision Research.

[19]  R. Shapley,et al.  Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  Casimir J. H. Ludwig,et al.  The Temporal Impulse Response Underlying Saccadic Decisions , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Gray,et al.  Dynamics of striate cortical activity in the alert macaque: I. Incidence and stimulus-dependence of gamma-band neuronal oscillations. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Yan Zhuo,et al.  Contributions of the Visual Ventral Pathway to Long-Range Apparent Motion , 2003, Science.

[23]  J. Movshon,et al.  The Timing of Response Onset and Offset in Macaque Visual Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  G. Orban,et al.  A Higher Order Motion Region in Human Inferior Parietal Lobule Evidence from fMRI , 2003, Neuron.

[25]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[26]  W. Beaudot.  Rapid communication Role of onset asynchrony in contour integration q , 2002 .

[27]  J T Petersik.  The perceptual fate of letters in two kinds of apparent movement displays , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  UTE LEONARDS,et al.  The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture Segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[29]  K. Mullen,et al.  Orientation discrimination in human vision: Psychophysics and modeling , 2006, Vision Research.

[30]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Synchrony does not promote grouping in temporally structured displays , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Petersik Jt,et al.  Comments on Cavanagh and Mather (1989): Coming up short (and long) , 1991 .

[32]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[33]  M. Dawson,et al.  The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem. , 1991, Psychological review.

[34]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceptual Organization of Apparent Motion in the Ternus Display , 1999, Perception.

[35]  V. Bringuier,et al.  The visual cortical association field: A Gestalt concept or a psychophysiological entity? , 2000, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[36]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[37]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Apparent Motion: Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Perceptual Switches and States , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Orientation Specificity and Spatial Selectivity in Human Vision , 1973, Perception.

[39]  J. T. Petersik,et al.  Failure to find an absolute retinal limit of a putative short-range process in apparent motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[40]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Impoverished second-order input to global linking in human vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[41]  R. Hess,et al.  Orientation sensitivity in human visual motion processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[42]  J T Petersik,et al.  Effects of spatial parameters on the perceptual organization of a bistable motion display , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[44]  Nicholas E Scott-Samuel,et al.  Spatial resolution and receptive field height of motion sensors in human vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[45]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[46]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Synchrony Unbound A Critical Evaluation of the Temporal Binding Hypothesis , 1999, Neuron.

[47]  N E Scott-Samuel,et al.  What does the Ternus Display Tell us about Motion Processing in Human Vision? , 2001, Perception.

[48]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Perceptual grouping in the Ternus display: evidence for an `association field' in apparent motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[49]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Motion detection in the presence of local orientation changes. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[50]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Grouping local orientation and direction signals to extract spatial contours: Empirical tests of “association field” models of contour integration , 2005, Vision Research.

[51]  J. Movshon,et al.  Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[52]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Role of synchrony in contour binding: some transient doubts sustained. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[53]  P. Lennie,et al.  Information Conveyed by Onset Transients in Responses of Striate Cortical Neurons , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  S. Dakin,et al.  Snakes and ladders: the role of temporal modulation in visual contour integration , 2001, Vision Research.

[55]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Relationship between intrinsic connections and functional architecture revealed by optical imaging and in vivo targeted biocytin injections in primate striate cortex. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  S. Watamaniuk.  High-Level Motion Processing: Computational, Neurobiological, and Psychophysical Perspectives , 1999 .

[57]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[58]  Hansjoerg E. Kolder,et al.  Visual Psychophysics and Physiology , 1979 .

[59]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Filtering Reveals Form in Temporally Structured Displays , 1999 .

[60]  Marius Usher,et al.  Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception , 1998, Nature.

[61]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[62]  F. Campbell,et al.  Orientational selectivity of the human visual system , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[63]  R. Blake,et al.  Visual features that vary together over time group together over space , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  Oliver Braddick,et al.  Apparent motion and the motion detector , 1978 .

[65]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[66]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Orientation bandwidth: The effect of spatial and temporal frequency , 1992, Vision Research.

[67]  Taosheng Liu,et al.  Human MT+ mediates perceptual filling-in during apparent motion , 2004, NeuroImage.

[68]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[69]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Orientation dependent modulation of apparent speed: a model based on the dynamics of feed-forward and horizontal connectivity in V1 cortex , 2002, Vision Research.

[70]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The orientation specificity of two visual after‐effects , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[71]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Short-range vs long-range motion: not a valid distinction. , 1991, Spatial vision.