Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference.

BACKGROUND Hypnosis has been used clinically for hundreds of years and is primarily a phenomenon involving attentive receptive concentration. Cognitive science has not fully exploited hypnosis and hypnotic suggestion as experimental tools. This study was designed to determine whether a hypnotic suggestion to hinder lexical processing could modulate the Stroop effect. METHODS Behavioral Stroop data were collected from 16 highly suggestible and 16 less suggestible subjects; both naturally vigilant and under posthypnotic suggestion. Subjects were urged to only attend to the ink color and to impede reading the stimuli under posthypnotic suggestion. RESULTS Whereas posthypnotic suggestion eliminated Stroop interference for highly suggestible subjects, less suggestible control subjects showed no significant reduction in the interference effect. CONCLUSIONS This outcome challenges the dominant view that word recognition is obligatory for proficient readers, and may provide insight into top-down influences of suggestion on cognition.

[1]  J. Laurence,et al.  Hypnotic susceptibility and verbal automaticity: automatic and strategic processing differences in the Stroop color-naming task. , 1992, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  D. Spiegel,et al.  Hypnotic alteration of somatosensory perception. , 1989, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  D. Algom,et al.  Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention. , 1999 .

[4]  D. Besner,et al.  The myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from Stroop’s paradigm , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Chun R. Luo,et al.  Semantic Competition as The Basis of Stroop Interference: Evidence From Color-Word Matching Tasks , 1999 .

[6]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Derek Besner,et al.  Unconsciously controlled processing: the stroop effect reconsidered , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  M. Erickson.  The Induction of Color Blindness by a Technique of Hypnotic Suggestion , 1939 .

[9]  D. Besner,et al.  What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  I. Kirsch,et al.  A spectral analysis of cognitive and personality variables in hypnosis: empirical disconfirmation of the two-factor model of hypnotic responding , 1995 .

[11]  P. Harriman.  Hypnotic Induction of Color Vision Anomalies: I. the Use of the Ishihara and the Jensen Tests to Verify the Acceptance of Suggested Color Blindness , 1942 .

[12]  J. Laurence,et al.  Hypnotizability and automaticity: toward a parallel distributed processing model of hypnotic responding. , 1990, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[14]  W. F. Grether.  A Comment on “The Induction of Color Blindness by a Technique of Hypnotic Suggestion” , 1940 .

[15]  G. S. Blum,et al.  The detection over time of subjects simulating hypnosis. , 1971, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[16]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial-selective attention: combined evidence from fMRI and event-related potentials. , 1999 .

[17]  Daniel Algom,et al.  The stroop effect: It is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[18]  D. Algom,et al.  Processing picture-word stimuli: the contingent nature of picture and of word superiority. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[20]  Dale S. Klopfer,et al.  Stroop Interference and Color-Word Similarity , 1996 .

[21]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Irving Kirsch,et al.  Imaginative Suggestibility and Hypnotizability , 2001 .

[23]  J. Kuhl,et al.  Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes stroop interference , 1999 .

[24]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  The stroop task : the «Gold Standard» of attentional measures , 1992 .

[25]  W. Singer,et al.  Activation of Heschl’s Gyrus during Auditory Hallucinations , 1999, Neuron.

[26]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  James H. Neely,et al.  Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. , 2001 .

[29]  W. Glaser,et al.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Amir Raz,et al.  Hypnosis and neuroscience: a cross talk between clinical and cognitive research. , 2002, Archives of General Psychiatry.

[31]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[32]  Hypnotic color blindness and performance on the stroop test , 2001, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[33]  John Theios,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. , 1989 .

[34]  D. Werman.  Trance and Treatment: Clinical Uses of Hypnosis , 1979 .

[35]  K. Pribram,et al.  Hypnotic hallucination alters evoked potentials. , 1985, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[36]  S. Keele.  Attention demands of memory retrieval. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[38]  P. Sheehan,et al.  Strategy manipulation and the Stroop effect in hypnosis. , 1988, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  C. Frith,et al.  Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. , 1999, Science.

[40]  M. Nash.  The truth and the hype of hypnosis. , 2001, Scientific American.

[41]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain. , 2000, The American journal of psychiatry.

[42]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. A Horse Race of a Different Color: Stroop Interference Patterns With Transformed Words v , 2022 .

[43]  C. Sipprelle,et al.  Color blindness, perceptual interference, and hypnosis. , 1978, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[44]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Strategies in the color-word Stroop task , 1984 .

[45]  C Nahmias,et al.  Where the imaginal appears real: a positron emission tomography study of auditory hallucinations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  D. Besner,et al.  Processing in the stroop task : Mental set as a determinant of performance , 1997 .

[47]  D. Algom,et al.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects. , 2003, Psychological review.

[48]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[49]  Derek Besner,et al.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  E Berendsen,et al.  Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[51]  Strategy manipulation and the Stroop effect in hypnosis. , 1988 .

[52]  G. E. MacKinnon,et al.  Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[53]  D. Besner,et al.  Context dependency in Stroop's paradigm: when are words treated as nonlinguistic objects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[54]  R. H. Phaf,et al.  SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  A. Vivas,et al.  Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  I. Kirsch,et al.  Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: an empirical analysis. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.