Digital Doorway: Social‐Technical Innovation for High‐Needs Communities

The application of the Living Lab (LL) approach to social‐technical innovation to the Digital Doorway Initiative in the informal settlement of Zandspruit near Johannesburg is outlined in the context of the initiative's evolution from an educational project to a broader community innovation initiative. The relationship between different stakeholders is explored in a theoretical and practical sense as a future research and practice challenge for both the study of ICTs in society (in this case, a poor community), and the fostering of community‐driven innovation. The activity also offers a research challenge for understanding the cultural transformations that are necessary for bringing about more effective integration between technical and social‐technical viewpoints about design and research in a social context. Current and projected community‐based research activities are also outlined, including the development of a project in Australia for high‐needs indigenous communities.

[1]  John Falzon,et al.  The Wretched of the Earth , 2019, Wageless Life.

[2]  Susan R. Jones.  The Unheard Voices: Community Organizations and Service Learning , 2010, The Journal of Higher Education.

[3]  Gary Wills,et al.  Social and Community Informatics and Social Theories of Networks , 2009 .

[4]  Henry Linger,et al.  Community Informatics and Information Systems: Can They Be Better Connected? , 2009, Inf. Soc..

[5]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  One Laptop per Child: Vision vs. Reality , 2022 .

[6]  M. Huchzermeyer.  The struggle for in situ upgrading of informal settlements: a reflection on cases in Gauteng , 2009 .

[7]  Siobhan Stevenson,et al.  Digital Divide: A Discursive Move Away from the Real Inequities , 2009, Inf. Soc..

[8]  三嶋 博之.  The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[9]  M Herselman,et al.  Catalysing innovation: the promise of the Living Lab Approach in South Africa , 2008 .

[10]  Lan Anh Tran,et al.  Handbook of Research on Public Information Technology , 2008 .

[11]  Michael Gurstein,et al.  What is Community Informatics (and Why Does It Matter)? , 2007, ArXiv.

[12]  Graeme Johanson,et al.  Constructing and Sharing Memory: Community Informatics, Identity and Empowerment , 2007 .

[13]  R. Heeks.  Theorizing ICT4D Research , 2007 .

[14]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Participatory design for social development: A South African case study on community-based health information systems , 2007 .

[15]  Ritu Dangwal,et al.  Acquisition of Computing Literacy on Shared Public Computers: Children and the "Hole in the Wall" , 2005 .

[16]  Randy R. Stoecker,et al.  Is Community Informatics Good for Communities? Questions Confronting an Emerging Field , 2005, J. Community Informatics.

[17]  Randy Stoecker,et al.  Research Methods for Community Change: A Project-Based Approach , 2005 .

[18]  John Sherry,et al.  Local Learnings: An Essay on Designing to Facilitate Effective Use of ICT s , 2004, J. Community Informatics.

[19]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[21]  M. Lamont,et al.  The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences , 2002 .

[22]  Fred Carden,et al.  Outcome mapping : building learning and reflection into development programs [Arabic version] , 2002 .

[23]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  An Information-Based Model of NGO Mediation for the Empowerment of Slum Dwellers in Bangalore , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[24]  M. Turshen.  Development as Freedom , 2001 .

[25]  C. Avgerou,et al.  Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries , 2001 .

[26]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Community informatics , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[28]  R. Bishop.  Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A Maori approach to creating knowledge , 1998 .

[29]  L. Suchman.  The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces:The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human- Computer Interfaces. , 1997 .

[30]  P. Thomas.  The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces , 1995 .

[31]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[32]  A. Giddens.  The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies , 1992 .

[33]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[34]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[35]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[36]  A. Giddens,et al.  New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. , 1977 .

[37]  R. Merton.  The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action , 1936 .

[38]  R. Bishop.  Freeing Ourselves from Neo-Colonial Domination in Research , 2011 .

[39]  N. Webster.  The Unheard Voices: Community Organizations and Service-Learning , 2010 .

[40]  Larry Stillman,et al.  Is there an ideal type? Developing planning and evaluation models for a digital social inclusion project: Digital Doorways, South Africa , 2008 .

[41]  Kim Gush,et al.  Towards a more personalised user experience and better demographic data on the Digital Doorway public computer terminals , 2008 .

[42]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Conceptualising Information Culture in Developing Countries , 2008 .

[43]  K. Kondlo,et al.  State of the nation: South Africa , 2008 .

[44]  John Law,et al.  Networks, relations, cyborgs: on the social study of technology , 2006 .

[45]  Jacques Steyn,et al.  Community memory and ICT in a developing economy , 2006 .

[46]  Ian J. McNiven,et al.  Appropriated Pasts: Indigenous Peoples and the Colonial Culture of Archaeology , 2005 .

[47]  Randy Stoecker,et al.  Research Methods for Community Change , 2005 .

[48]  M. Eriksson.  State-ofthe-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach , 2005 .

[49]  B. Keeble.  Challenging the digital divide? A literature review of community informatics initiatives , 2004 .

[50]  M. Gibson.  ANTHROPOLOGY AND TRADITION : A CONTEMPORARY ABORIGINAL VIEWPOINT , 2003 .

[51]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technologies-in-practice: an enacted lens for studying technology in organizations , 1999 .

[52]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis , 1996 .

[53]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A short critique , 1996 .

[54]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[55]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[56]  Otto Bird.  The Idea of Justice , 1967 .

[57]  M. Weber.  From Max Weber: Essays in sociology , 1946 .

[58]  S. Romaniuk.  Dependency Theory , 2022 .