An applied methodology for stakeholder identification in transdisciplinary research

In this paper we present a novel methodology for identifying stakeholders for the purpose of engaging with them in transdisciplinary, sustainability research projects. In transdisciplinary research, it is important to identify a range of stakeholders prior to the problem-focussed stages of research. Early engagement with diverse stakeholders creates space for them to influence the research process, including problem definition, from the start. However, current stakeholder analysis approaches ignore this initial identification process, or position it within the subsequent content-focussed stages of research. Our methodology was designed as part of a research project into a range of soil threats in seventeen case study locations throughout Europe. Our methodology was designed to be systematic across all sites. It is based on a snowball sampling approach that can be implemented by researchers with no prior experience of stakeholder research, and without requiring significant financial or time resources. It therefore fosters transdisciplinarity by empowering physical scientists to identify stakeholders and understand their roles. We describe the design process and outcomes, and consider their applicability to other research projects. Our methodology therefore consists of a two-phase process of design and implementation of an identification questionnaire. By explicitly including a design phase into the process, it is possible to tailor our methodology to other research projects.

[1]  E. Ruto,et al.  Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  R. Hessel,et al.  From Framework to Action: The DESIRE Approach to Combat Desertification , 2014, Environmental Management.

[3]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Stakeholder participation in evaluation: How important is diversity? , 1997 .

[4]  Joern Fischer,et al.  The role of scenarios in fostering collective action for sustainable development: Lessons from central Romania , 2016 .

[5]  Antony S. Cheng,et al.  Transdisciplinary research on environmental governance: A view from the inside , 2014 .

[6]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[8]  C. Prell,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2009, Society & Natural Resources.

[9]  Strategic Management: Stakeholder Management: Framework and Philosophy , 2010 .

[10]  Gudrun Schwilch,et al.  Appraising and selecting conservation measures to mitigate desertification and land degradation based on stakeholder participation and global best practices , 2009 .

[11]  Sigrid Stagl,et al.  Learning from Doing Participatory Rural Research: Lessons from the Peak District National Park , 2006, Journal of Agricultural Economics.

[12]  T. Hels,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison , 2004 .

[13]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[14]  Daniel J. Fiorino Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[15]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  Viability of using global standards for neighbourhood sustainability assessment: insights from a comparative case study , 2015 .

[16]  S. Fletcher Influences on stakeholder representation in participatory coastal management programmes , 2007 .

[17]  P. Wester,et al.  Boundaries of Consent: Stakeholder Representation in River Basin Management in Mexico and South Africa , 2003 .

[18]  Kara L Hall,et al.  The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  N. Letki,et al.  Socialization for Participation? Trust, Membership, and Democratization in East-Central Europe , 2004 .

[20]  G. Fry Multifunctional landscapes - towards transdisciplinary research , 2001 .

[21]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[22]  Patricia Santos,et al.  A structured multi-stakeholder learning process for Sustainable Land Management. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  A. Stirling “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[24]  Janita F. J. Vos,et al.  Stakeholder identification in innovation projects going beyond classification , 2006 .

[25]  J. Leventon,et al.  Multi‐level Governance, Multi‐level Deficits: The Case of Drinking Water Management in Hungary , 2012 .

[26]  Robin Grimble,et al.  Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities , 1997 .

[27]  H. Hurni,,et al.  Transdisciplinarity in Practice. Experience from a Concept-based Research Programme Addressing Global Change and Sustainable Development , 2014 .

[28]  M. Reed,et al.  Biodiversity, land degradation, and climate change: Participatory planning in Romania , 2009 .

[29]  Helle Munk Ravnborg,et al.  Understanding interdependencies: stakeholder identification and negotiation for collective natural resource management , 2002 .

[30]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Analytic and Dynamic Approach to Collaboration: A Transdisciplinary Case Study on Sustainable Landscape Development in a Swiss Prealpine Region , 2008 .

[31]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods , 2012 .

[32]  Emmy Bergsma,et al.  Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[33]  L. Bracken,et al.  Transdisciplinary research: understanding the stakeholder perspective , 2015 .

[34]  Janita F. J. Vos Corporate social responsibility and the identification of stakeholders , 2003 .

[35]  L. Stringer,et al.  Partnership Models for Climate Compatible Development: Experiences from Zambia , 2013 .

[36]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  Research , part of a Special Feature on Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Governance Competing Structure, Competing Views: The Role of Formal and Informal Social Structures in Shaping Stakeholder Perceptions , 2010 .

[37]  Matthias Bergmann,et al.  Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization , 2012 .

[38]  C. Adair,et al.  Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. , 2007, The Milbank quarterly.