The Relationship between T1 Sagittal Angle and Sagittal Balance: A Retrospective Study of 119 Healthy Volunteers

T1 sagittal angle has been reported to be used as a parameter for assessing sagittal balance and cervical lordosis. However, no study has been performed to explore the relationship between T1 sagittal angle and sagittal balance, and whether T1 sagittal angle could be used for osteotomy guidelines remains unknown. The aim of our study is to explore the relationship between T1 sagittal angle and sagittal balance, determine the predictors for T1 sagittal angle, and determine whether T1 sagittal angle could be used for osteotomy guidelines to restore sagittal balance. Medical records of healthy volunteers in our outpatient clinic from January 2014 to August 2015 were reviewed, and their standing full-spine lateral radiographs were evaluated. Demographic and radiological parameters were collected and analyzed, including age, gender, T1 sagittal angle, maxTK, maxLL, SS, PT, and PI. Correlation coefficients between T1 sagittal angle and other spinopelvic parameters were determined. In addition, multiple regression analysis was performed to establish predictive radiographic parameters for T1 sagittal angle as the primary contributors. A total of 119 healthy volunteers were recruited in our study with a mean age of 34.7 years. It was found that T1 sagittal angle was correlated with maxTK with very good significance (r = 0.697, P<0.001), maxLL with weak significance (r = 0.206, P = 0.024), SS with weak significance (r = 0.237, P = 0.009), PI with very weak significance (r = 0.189, P = 0.039), SVA with moderate significance (r = 0.445, P<0.001), TPA with weak significance (r = 0.207, P = 0.023), and T1SPI with weak significance (r = 0.309, P = 0.001). The result of multiple regression analysis showed that T1 sagittal angle could be predicted by using the following regression equation: T1 sagittal angle = 0.6 * maxTK—0.2 * maxLL + 8. In the healthy population, T1 sagittal angle could be considered as a useful parameter for sagittal balance; however, it could not be thoroughly replaced for SVA. maxTK was the primary contributor to T1 sagittal angle. According to this equation, we could restore sagittal balance by surgically changing thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, which could serve as a guideline for osteotomy.

[1]  J. Jang,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome due to Sagittal Imbalance , 2007, Spine.

[2]  P. Hoffmeyer,et al.  Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[3]  A. Feydy,et al.  Sagittal balance of the spine in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures , 2016, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  M. Dekutoski,et al.  Sagittal Balance and Spinopelvic Parameters After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis: A Case-Control Study , 2014, Spine.

[5]  M. Bond,et al.  Scoliosis Research Society–Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification: A Validation Study * , 2018, 50 Landmark Papers.

[6]  P. Roussouly,et al.  Sacral and pelvic osteotomies for correction of spinal deformities , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[7]  Jung-Hee Lee,et al.  Is pelvic incidence a constant, as everyone knows? Changes of pelvic incidence in surgically corrected adult sagittal deformity , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[8]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[9]  Jing-feng Li,et al.  Radiographic Parameters in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis and Different Parameters Between Sagittal Balanced and Imbalanced ADS Patients , 2015, Medicine.

[10]  Christopher Ames,et al.  TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  B. Misaggi,et al.  Sagittal balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiographic study of spino-pelvic compensation after surgery , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[12]  J. Mac-Thiong,et al.  Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[13]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  The Impact of Standing Regional Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Outcomes in Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[14]  Ashish Patel,et al.  Pelvic Tilt and Truncal Inclination: Two Key Radiographic Parameters in the Setting of Adults With Spinal Deformity , 2009, Spine.

[15]  Xianzhao Wei,et al.  Lumbar Lordosis Minus Thoracic Kyphosis: Remain Constant in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Before and After Correction Surgery , 2016, Spine.

[16]  G. Bollini,et al.  Interest of T1 parameters for sagittal alignment evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[17]  Xianzhao Wei,et al.  Lumbar Lordosis Minus Thoracic Kyphosis: A Novel Regional Predictor for Sagittal Balance in Elderly Populations , 2016, Spine.

[18]  Pierre Roussouly,et al.  Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[19]  M. Etemadifar,et al.  Comparison of Scheuermann’s kyphosis correction by combined anterior–posterior fusion versus posterior-only procedure , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[20]  J. Villafañe,et al.  Anterior column realignment from a lateral approach for the treatment of severe sagittal imbalance: a retrospective radiographic study , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[21]  B. Wiedenhöfer,et al.  [Sagittal deformity. Basic principles of surgical strategies]. , 2011, Der Orthopade.

[22]  P. Knott,et al.  The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[23]  S. Aunoble,et al.  Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[24]  Z. Wang,et al.  Two-Level Spinal Osteotomy for Severe Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Experience With 48 Patients , 2014, Spine.

[25]  A. Crawford,et al.  Analysis of Sagittal Alignment in Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: How Do These Two Curve Types Differ? , 2007, Spine.

[26]  M. Matsumoto,et al.  Factors Affecting the Postoperative Progression of Thoracic Kyphosis in Surgically Treated Adult Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Scoliosis , 2014, Spine.

[27]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  The Influence of Thoracic Inlet Alignment on the Craniocervical Sagittal Balance in Asymptomatic Adults , 2012, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[28]  İ. Coşkun Benlidayı,et al.  Comparative study of lumbosacral alignment in elderly versus young adults: data on patients with low back pain , 2015, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.

[29]  B. Qian,et al.  T1 Pelvic Angle: A New Predictor for Postoperative Sagittal Balance and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Scoliosis , 2014, Spine.

[30]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[31]  L. Jean.  Influence of age and sagittal balance of the spine on the value of the pelvic incidence , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[32]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  B. Wiedenhöfer,et al.  Dreidimensionale Korrekturprinzipien einer dreidimensionalen Deformität , 2011, Der Orthopäde.