Quality of diurnal intraocular pressure control in primary open-angle patients treated with latanoprost compared with surgically treated glaucoma patients: a prospective trial

Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) diurnal fluctuations of glaucoma patients treated with latanoprost 0.005% once a day with patients with controlled IOP after deep sclerectomy or trabeculectomy. Methods: The trial included 60 prospectively recruited subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma. The medical group consisted of 20 patients with controlled IOP (<18 mm Hg) under latanoprost 0.005% monotherapy and with no history of previous intraocular surgery or argon laser trabeculoplasty; the surgical groups included 20 patients after trabeculectomy, and 20 patients after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant (DSCI). The patients in the surgical groups had a controlled IOP without any ocular hypotensive medications. All patients underwent a diurnal tension curve (08:00–17:00/three-hour intervals), followed by a water-drinking test (WDT) with the last IOP measurement taken at 21:00 hours. The between-group differences were tested for significance by means of analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Baseline IOP was significantly different between the trabeculectomy group (10.1 mm Hg (3.4 SD)), the DSCI group (13.9 mm Hg (2.8)) and the latanoprost group (15.5 mm Hg (2.0); p = 0.005). The average IOP during the diurnal tension curve (10.1, 13.7, and 15.7 mm Hg, respectively, for the trabeculectomy, DSCI, and latanoprost groups) differed significantly between groups (ANOVA; p<0.0001), but the variation was comparable in the three groups (ANOVA; p = 0.13). After the WDT, elevation of IOP was significantly greater among patients treated with latanoprost (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Trabeculectomy patients had a statistically significant lower average IOP in the diurnal tension curve compared with the other two groups. No wider variation in diurnal IOP with latanoprost compared with the surgical procedures was found. The IOP increase during the WDT was most marked in patients under latanoprost therapy.

[1]  J. Wilensky The role of diurnal pressure measurements in the management of open angle glaucoma , 2004, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[2]  N. Orzalesi,et al.  Effect of timolol, latanoprost, and dorzolamide on circadian IOP in glaucoma or ocular hypertension. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  R. Susanna,et al.  Comparison of latanoprost with fixed-combination dorzolamide and timolol in adult patients with elevated intraocular pressure: an eight-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study in Latin America. , 2004, Clinical therapeutics.

[4]  J. Diamond,et al.  24-Hour Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma Management: A Retrospective Review , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.

[5]  F. Topouzis,et al.  24-hour intraocular pressure control with maximum medical therapy compared with surgery in patients with advanced open-angle glaucoma. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[6]  K. Yoshikawa,et al.  Normal tension glaucoma: The value of predictive tests , 1993, Acta ophthalmologica.

[7]  C. Chiang,et al.  The application of water drinking test on the evaluation of trabeculectomy patency. , 2000, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[8]  A. Konstas,et al.  Diurnal intraocular pressure reduction with latanoprost 0.005% compared to timolol maleate 0.5% as monotherapy in subjects with exfoliation glaucoma , 2004, Eye.

[9]  J. A. Roth Inadequate diagnostic value of the water-drinking test. , 1974, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  D. Kripke,et al.  Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucomatous changes. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  D. Kripke,et al.  Comparison of the nocturnal effects of once-daily timolol and latanoprost on intraocular pressure. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[13]  J. Flammer,et al.  Correlations between intraocular pressure, visual field and visual acuity, based on 11 years of observations of treated chronic glaucomas , 1980, International Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Winder,et al.  Ocular hypertension and systemic responses to the water-drinking test. , 1978, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  N. Anand,et al.  Deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C , 2005, Eye.

[16]  N. Orzalesi,et al.  The effect of latanoprost, brimonidine, and a fixed combination of timolol and dorzolamide on circadian intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  D. Sisto,et al.  Water-drinking test in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma while treated with different topical medications. , 2004, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[18]  S. Asrani,et al.  Large Diurnal Fluctuations in Intraocular Pressure Are an Independent Risk Factor in Patients With Glaucoma , 2000, Journal of glaucoma.

[19]  A. Konstas,et al.  Effect of timolol on the diurnal intraocular pressure in exfoliation and primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Intraocular pressure fluctuations in medical versus surgically treated glaucomatous patients. , 2002, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[21]  K. Rasmussen,et al.  DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE WATER‐DRINKING TEST IN EARLY DETECTION OF SIMPLE GLAUCOMA , 1976, Acta ophthalmologica.

[22]  Y. Akova,et al.  Comparison of additional intraocular pressure-lowering effects of latanoprost vs brimonidine in primary open-angle glaucoma patients with intraocular pressure uncontrolled by timolol–dorzolamide combination , 2005, Eye.

[23]  A. Konstas,et al.  Diurnal intraocular pressure in untreated exfoliation and primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  P. Kronfeld Water drinking and outflow facility. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[25]  H. Scheie,et al.  The importance and accuracy of the water drinking test and tonography. , 1975, Annals of ophthalmology.

[26]  R. A. P. Guedes,et al.  Application du test de surcharge hydrique après sclérectomie profonde non perforante , 2005 .

[27]  R. Hitchings,et al.  Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[28]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Intraocular pressure fluctuations in response to the water-drinking provocative test in patients using latanoprost versus unoprostone. , 2004, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[29]  H Goldmann,et al.  Open-angle glaucoma. , 1972, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Clinical Decisions In Glaucoma , 1993 .

[31]  P. Niesel,et al.  Die quantitative Perimetrie beim Glaukompatienten ohne lokale Gesichtsfelddefekte , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.