Effect of temperature change on the performance of the hybrid linear flow channel reactor and its implications on sulphate-reducing and sulphide-oxidising microbial community dynamics

Semi-passive bioremediation is a promising strategy to mitigate persistent low volume mine-impacted wastewater containing high sulphate concentrations. Building on the proof of concept demonstration of the hybrid linear flow channel reactor (LFCR), capable of simultaneous biological sulphate reduction and partial sulphide oxidation with elemental sulphur recovery, the impact of key operating parameters, such as temperature, on process performance is critical to real-world application. Temperature fluctuates seasonally and across the diurnal cycle, impacting biological sulphate reduction (BSR) and partial sulphide oxidation. The process is reliant on the metabolic activity and synergistic interactions between sulphate-reducing (SRB) and sulphide-oxidising (SOB) microbial communities that develop within discrete oxic and anoxic microenvironments within the hybrid LFCR. In this study, the impact of operating temperature on process performance was evaluated by decreasing temperature with time from 30 to 10°C in each of three laboratory-scaled hybrid LFCR units operating in pseudo-steady state at 1 g/L sulphate. Using lactate as a carbon source, two reactor sizes (2 and 8 L) were considered, while the impact of lactate vs. acetate as carbon source was evaluated in the 2 L reactors. On incremental decrease in temperature from 30 to 10°C, a decrease in volumetric sulphate reduction rate was observed: from 0.144 to 0.059 mmol/L.h in the 2 L lactate-fed reactor; from 0.128 to 0.042 mmol/L.h in the 8 L lactate-fed reactor; and from 0.127 to 0.010 mmol/L.h in the 2 L acetate-fed reactor. Similarly, sulphate conversion efficiency decreased (2 L lactate-fed: 66% to 27%; 8 L lactate-fed: 61% to 20%; 2 L acetate-fed: 61% to 5%). A decrease in temperature below the critical value (15°C) led to considerable loss in metabolic activity and overall BSR performance. Sessile and planktonic microbial communities were represented by bacterial phyla including Proteobacteria, Synergistetes, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. A diverse group of putative SRB (Deltaproteobacteria) and SOB, including Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Epsilonproteobacteria phylotypes, were prevalent and shifted in relative abundance and community composition in response to decreasing temperature. Specifically, the decrease in the relative abundance of Deltaproteobacteria with decreasing temperature below 15°C corresponded with a loss of BSR performance across all three reactors. This study demonstrated the impact of low temperature on the physiological selection and ecological differentiation of SRB and SOB communities within the hybrid LFCR and its implications for real-world process performance.

[1]  Zhenghua Liu,et al.  Microbiological Sulfide Removal—From Microorganism Isolation to Treatment of Industrial Effluent , 2021, Microorganisms.

[2]  S. Harrison,et al.  Effects of reactor geometry and electron donor on performance of the hybrid linear flow channel reactor , 2020 .

[3]  J. Majtacz,et al.  The Influence of Sulfate on Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation in a Sequencing Batch Reactor , 2020 .

[4]  S. Harrison,et al.  Effect of hydraulic residence time on biological sulphate reduction and elemental sulphur recovery in a single-stage hybrid linear flow channel reactor , 2020 .

[5]  J. Molson,et al.  Salinity and low temperature effects on the performance of column biochemical reactors for the treatment of acidic and neutral mine drainage. , 2019, Chemosphere.

[6]  M. Anbia,et al.  Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Gas Streams Using Porous Materials: A Review , 2019, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

[7]  T. Marais,et al.  Demonstration of simultaneous biological sulphate reduction and partial sulphide oxidation in a hybrid linear flow channel reactor , 2019, bioRxiv.

[8]  G. Vidal,et al.  Review of Constructed Wetlands for Acid Mine Drainage Treatment , 2018, Water.

[9]  Huaiwei Liu,et al.  H2S biotreatment with sulfide-oxidizing heterotrophic bacteria , 2018, Biodegradation.

[10]  Huaiwei Liu,et al.  H2S biotreatment with sulfide-oxidizing heterotrophic bacteria , 2018, Biodegradation.

[11]  F. Scolari,et al.  Myroides odoratimimus urinary tract infection in an immunocompromised patient: an emerging multidrug-resistant micro-organism , 2018, Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control.

[12]  G. Gherardi,et al.  Infection of recurrent calcaneal ulcer caused by a biofilm-producer Myroides odoratimimus strain , 2018, Folia Microbiologica.

[13]  Zhigang Yu,et al.  Microbial Diversity and Community Structure of Sulfate-Reducing and Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria in Sediment Cores from the East China Sea , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[14]  P. Zheng,et al.  Elemental sulfur recovery of biological sulfide removal process from wastewater: A review , 2017 .

[15]  S. Marshall,et al.  Alginate overproduction and biofilm formation by psychrotolerant Pseudomonas mandelii depend on temperature in Antarctic marine sediments , 2017 .

[16]  Jasmine Chong,et al.  MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Yanchen Liu,et al.  Microbial Character Related Sulfur Cycle under Dynamic Environmental Factors Based on the Microbial Population Analysis in Sewerage System , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[18]  Yanshu Li,et al.  Compositions and Abundances of Sulfate-Reducing and Sulfur-Oxidizing Microorganisms in Water-Flooded Petroleum Reservoirs with Different Temperatures in China , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[19]  R. Bakke,et al.  Modeling N / S ratio and temperature influences on simultaneous biological denitrification and sulfide oxidation , 2017 .

[20]  G. Andreottola,et al.  Temperature Effects on the Activity of Denitrifying Phosphate Accumulating Microorganisms and Sulphate Reducing Bacteria in Anaerobic SideStream Reactor , 2017 .

[21]  Paul J. McMurdie,et al.  DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[22]  B. Jørgensen,et al.  Activity and community structures of sulfate-reducing microorganisms in polar, temperate and tropical marine sediments , 2015, The ISME Journal.

[23]  N. Pisutpaisal,et al.  Optimizing Sulfur Oxidizing Performance of Paracoccus Pantotrophus Isolated from Leather Industry Wastewater , 2015 .

[24]  Jaak Vilo,et al.  ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Mark C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  A review of biological sulfate conversions in wastewater treatment. , 2014, Water research.

[26]  T. Stephenson,et al.  Bio‐Struvite: A New Route to Recover Phosphorus from Wastewater , 2014 .

[27]  A. Stams,et al.  Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  M. V. van Hoek Biofilms , 2013, Virulence.

[29]  L. Celis,et al.  Rapid start‐up of a sulfidogenic biofilm reactor: overcoming low acetate consumption , 2013 .

[30]  A. Lemmer,et al.  Effects of temperature, pH and O2 on the removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas by external biological desulfurization in a full scale fixed-bed trickling bioreactor (FBTB) , 2013 .

[31]  Emily R. Davenport,et al.  Taxonomic Classification of Bacterial 16S rRNA Genes Using Short Sequencing Reads: Evaluation of Effective Study Designs , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  Pelin Yilmaz,et al.  The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  N. Mooruth An investigation towards passive treatment solutions for the oxidation of sulphide and subsequent removal of sulphur from acid mine water , 2013 .

[34]  B. Jørgensen,et al.  Temperature characteristics of bacterial sulfate reduction in continental shelf and slope sediments , 2012 .

[35]  V. Leão,et al.  Implications of volatile fatty acid profile on the metabolic pathway during continuous sulfate reduction. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  S. Harrison,et al.  Effect of culture conditions on the competitive interaction between lactate oxidizers and fermenters in a biological sulfate reduction system. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[37]  T. McCarthy,et al.  The impact of acid mine drainage in South Africa , 2011 .

[38]  A. Sheoran,et al.  Bioremediation of acid-rock drainage by sulphate-reducing prokaryotes: A review , 2010 .

[39]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Biofilm‐forming capacity, surface hydrophobicity and aggregation characteristics of Myroides odoratus isolated from South African Oreochromis mossambicus fish , 2009, Journal of applied microbiology.

[40]  S. Harrison,et al.  Study of anaerobic lactate metabolism under biosulfidogenic conditions. , 2009, Water research.

[41]  Mark Dopson,et al.  Effect of sulfide removal on sulfate reduction at pH 5 in a hydrogen fed gas-lift bioreactor. , 2008, Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.

[42]  Muftah H. El-Naas,et al.  Sulfate inhibition effect on sulfate reducing bacteria , 2008 .

[43]  S. Potivichayanon,et al.  Hydrogen sulfide removal by a novel fixed-film bioscrubber system , 2006 .

[44]  S. Harrison,et al.  A kinetic study on anaerobic reduction of sulphate, part II: incorporation of temperature effects in the kinetic model , 2005 .

[45]  Nedwell,et al.  Effect of low temperature on microbial growth: lowered affinity for substrates limits growth at low temperature. , 1999, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[46]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .