Spatially regularized T1 estimation from variable flip angles MRI.

PURPOSE To develop efficient algorithms for fast voxel-by-voxel quantification of tissue longitudinal relaxation time (T1 ) from variable flip angles magnetic resonance images (MRI) to reduce voxel-level noise without blurring tissue edges. METHODS T1 estimations regularized by total variation (TV) and quadratic penalty are developed to measure T1 from fast variable flip angles MRI and to reduce voxel-level noise without decreasing the accuracy of the estimates. First, a quadratic surrogate for a log likelihood cost function of T1 estimation is derived based upon the majorization principle, and then the TV-regularized surrogate function is optimized by the fast iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithm. A fast optimization algorithm for the quadratically regularized T1 estimation is also presented. The proposed methods are evaluated by the simulated and experimental MR data. RESULTS The means of the T1 values in the simulated brain data estimated by the conventional, TV-regularized, and quadratically regularized methods have less than 3% error from the true T1 in both GM and WM tissues with image noise up to 9%. The relative standard deviations (SDs) of the T1 values estimated by the conventional method are more than 12% and 15% when the images have 7% and 9% noise, respectively. In comparison, the TV-regularized and quadratically regularized methods are able to suppress the relative SDs of the estimated T1 to be less than 2% and 3%, respectively, regardless of the image noise level. However, the quadratically regularized method tends to overblur the edges compared to the TV-regularized method. CONCLUSIONS The spatially regularized methods improve quality of T1 estimation from multiflip angles MRI. Quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can benefit from the high quality measurement of native T1 .

[1]  Joanna M. Wardlaw,et al.  Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to measure subtle blood–brain barrier abnormalities , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  John A Butman,et al.  Modulated repetition time look‐locker (MORTLL): A method for rapid high resolution three‐dimensional T1 mapping , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Bjoern H. Menze,et al.  Estimating Kinetic Parameter Maps From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Using Spatial Prior Knowledge , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Andy Adler,et al.  In Vivo Impedance Imaging With Total Variation Regularization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Regularization for uniform spatial resolution properties in penalized-likelihood image reconstruction , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  P. Bendel,et al.  An analysis of fast imaging sequences with steady‐state transverse magnetization refocusing , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  P Marzola,et al.  Bayesian estimation of relaxation times T(1) in MR images of irradiated Fricke-agarose gels. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Visualization in Biomedical Computing , 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  Fast Gradient-Based Algorithms for Constrained Total Variation Image Denoising and Deblurring Problems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  David M. Grant,et al.  Optimal determination of relaxation times of fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance. Determination of spin-lattice relaxation times in chemically polarized species , 1974 .

[11]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  B. Rutt,et al.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  G. Wright,et al.  Rapid high‐resolution T1 mapping by variable flip angles: Accurate and precise measurements in the presence of radiofrequency field inhomogeneity , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  N J Pelc,et al.  Optimization of flip angle for T1dependent contrast in MRI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  P. Kingsley,et al.  Methods of measuring spin-lattice ( T 1 ) relaxation times: an annotated bibliography , 1999 .

[16]  A. Padhani Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: Current status and future directions , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  John R. Votaw,et al.  Regularized image reconstruction algorithms for positron emission tomography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Daniel Normolle,et al.  Sensitivity of quantitative metrics derived from DCE MRI and a pharmacokinetic model to image quality and acquisition parameters. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[19]  P. Basser,et al.  Linear least‐squares method for unbiased estimation of T1 from SPGR signals , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  S. Riederer,et al.  Optimizing the precision in T1 relaxation estimation using limited flip angles , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  N J Pelc,et al.  Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Image restoration subject to a total variation constraint , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  T. Peters,et al.  Determination of optimal angles for variable nutation proton magnetic spin‐lattice, T1, and spin‐spin, T2, relaxation times measurement , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Regularized fieldmap estimation in MRI , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[26]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  MRI Simulation Based Evaluation and Classifications Methods , 1999, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[27]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[28]  S G Kim,et al.  Accurate T1 determination from inversion recovery images: Application to human brain at 4 Tesla , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  K. Scheffler,et al.  DCE-MRI in clinical trials: data acquisition techniques and analysis methods. , 2003, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[30]  Daniel P Barboriak,et al.  Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources. , 2009, Translational oncology.

[31]  R. Brooks,et al.  T1 and T2 in the brain of healthy subjects, patients with Parkinson disease, and patients with multiple system atrophy: relation to iron content. , 1999, Radiology.

[32]  G M Bydder,et al.  The design of a multiple inversion recovery sequence for T1 measurement , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Monotonicity of quadratic-approximation algorithms , 1988 .

[34]  Jonas Svensson,et al.  Effects of B1 inhomogeneity correction for three‐dimensional variable flip angle T1 measurements in hip dGEMRIC at 3 T and 1.5 T , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.