Hazardous waste lawsuits, stockholder returns, and deterrence

For the RCRA and Superfund Acts, the publicly announced desired effects are the protection of the public and natural resources from, and ultimate cleanup of, hazardous waste materials. If the regulations are working, firms are being deterred from illegal disposal of wastes. If not, the regulations are providing only illusions of improved safety, while the public actually faces a never ending process of site discovery and cleanup. While not addressed in previous empirical literature, the deterrent effects of the RCRA and Superfund Acts are the focus of this paper. The deterrent effects of the RCRA and Superfund Acts stem from the potential for suits against responsible parties seeking an end to violations, site cleanup, and reimbursement for expenditures and damages. This paper measures the impact of hazardous waste mismanagement lawsuits on stockholder returns. Specifically, the standard event-study method is used to directly measure the abnormal losses suffered by stockholders associated with lawsuit filings and settlements between 1977 and 1986.

[1]  B. Espen Eckbo,et al.  Antimerger Policy under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act: A Reexamination of the Market Power Hypothesis , 1985, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[2]  V. Smith,et al.  The value of avoiding a LULU: hazardous waste disposal sites. , 1986 .

[3]  James C. Hartigan,et al.  The Value of Administered Protection: A Capital Market Approach , 1986 .

[4]  G. Jarrell,et al.  Studying Firm-Specific Effects of Regulation with Stock Market Data: An Application to Oil Price Regulation , 1986 .

[5]  Harold C. Barnett.  The Allocation of Superfund, 1981-1983 , 1985 .

[6]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  On corporate governance: A study of proxy contests , 1983 .

[7]  M. Maloney,et al.  A Positive Theory of Environmental Quality Regulation , 1982, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[8]  Peggy Wier.  The costs of antimerger lawsuits: Evidence from the stock market☆ , 1983 .

[9]  Paul H. Malatesta.  Measuring Abnormal Performance: The Event Parameter Approach Using Joint Generalized Least Squares , 1986, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[10]  James Owers,et al.  Security price reactions around corporate spin-off announcements , 1983 .

[11]  H. Theil.  Principles of econometrics , 1971 .

[12]  M. Katzman.  Pollution Liability Insurance and Catastrophic Environmental Risk , 1988 .

[13]  W. Davidson.  THE EFFECT OF RATE CASES ON PUBLIC UTILITY STOCK RETURNS , 1984 .

[14]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[15]  Dennis E. Logue,et al.  Foundations of Finance. , 1977 .

[16]  John J. Binder.  On The Use Of The Multivariate Regression-Model In Event Studies , 1985 .

[17]  G. Schwert.  Using Financial Data to Measure Effects of Regulation , 1981, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[18]  K. Segerson.  Risk and incentives in the financing of hazardous waste cleanup , 1989 .

[19]  Arthur M. Sullivan,et al.  Policy options for toxics disposal: Laissez-faire, subsidization, and enforcement , 1987 .

[20]  E. Fama.  EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK* , 1970 .

[21]  B. Eckbo,et al.  Mergers and the Market Concentration Doctrine: Evidence from the Capital Market , 1985 .

[22]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies , 1985 .

[23]  W. Mikkelson,et al.  Withdrawn Security Offerings , 1988, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[24]  Martin T. Katzman.  Chemical catastrophes : regulating environmental risk through pollution liability insurance , 1985 .

[25]  Joel S. Hirschhorn,et al.  Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities , 1984 .