Is Tagging Effective? - Overlapping Ratios with Other Metadata Fields

The potential advantages of tagging have been addressed in numerous literatures, however still the effectiveness of tagging in information retrieval has not confirmed yet along with continuous intensive debates between advocates of new tagging systems versus traditional controlled vocabulary metadata. Despite all the potential advantages of tagging, the overlapping ratios between tags and the words used in other metadata fields, such as title and description, are significant. In this study, with the data from Youtube.com videos, the degree of overlapping is examined among the fields of title, description and tag, with additional questions about tagging, such as changes in numbers of words in each metadata field over time and the difference between web site promotion videos and non-promotion videos. The findings include 1) the number of words in each metadata fields have increased over time; 2) web site promotional videos have more words in each metadata fields than non-promotional videos; 3) more than 50% of words are shared among metadata fields including the tag field; 4) as much as 25% of the videos have the exactly same words repeated among the metadata fields. More similar studies with data from other social tagging sites are suggested to verify these findings.

[1]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  Return to Babel: Emergent Diversity, Digital Resources, and Local Knowledge , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[2]  Lizabeth Barclay,et al.  Tagging: People-Powered Metadata for the Social Web (Smith, G.; 2008) [Book Review] , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[3]  Krystyna K. Matusiak Towards user-centered indexing in digital image collections , 2006, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[4]  George Macgregor,et al.  Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool , 2006 .

[5]  John Riedl,et al.  The quest for quality tags , 2007, GROUP.

[6]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[7]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why do tagging systems work? , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Georgia Koutrika,et al.  Can social bookmarking improve web search? , 2008, WSDM '08.

[9]  Marieke Guy,et al.  Folksonomies: Tidying Up Tags? , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[10]  Xan Arch Creating the academic library folksonomy: Put social tagging to work at your institution , 2007 .

[11]  Justine Brown Tag! You're It!. , 2007 .

[12]  Heather Hedden How Semantic Tagglng Increases Findability , 2008 .

[13]  Louise F. Spiteri,et al.  The structure and form of folksonomy tags: The road to the public library catalog , 2007 .

[14]  Joshua Hartranft,et al.  TAG: you're it! , 2007, SIGUCCS '07.

[15]  Dana M. Caudle,et al.  To tag or not to tag? , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[16]  Melissa L. Rethlefsen Tags Help Make Libraries Del.icio.us: Social Bookmarking and Tagging Boost Participation. , 2007 .