Analysis of swimmers' velocity during the underwater gliding motion following grab start.

The purpose of this study was to determine the swimmers' loss of speed during the underwater gliding motion of a grab start. This study also set out to determine the kinematical variables influencing this loss of speed. Eight French national-level swimmers participated in this study. The swimmers were filmed using 4 mini-DV cameras during the entire underwater phase. Using the DLT technique and the Dempster's anthropometric data, swimmer's movement have been identified. Two principal components analysis (PCA) have been used to study the relations between the kinematical variables influencing the loss of speed. The swimmers reached a velocity between 2.2 and 1.9 ms(-1) after their centre of mass covered a distance ranging between 5.63 and 6.01 m from the start wall. For this range of velocity, head position was included between 6.02 and 6.51 m. First PCA show that the kinematical parameters at the immersion (first image at which the swimmers' whole body was under water) are included in the first two components. Second PCA show that the knee, hip and shoulder angles can be included in the same component. The present study identified the optimal instant for initiating underwater leg movements after a grab start. This study also showed that the performance during the underwater gliding motion is determined as much by variables at the immersion as by the swimmer's loss of speed. It also seems that to hold the streamlined position the synergetic action of the knee, the hip and the shoulder is essential.

[1]  Cheryl A. Juergens,et al.  A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the grab and track starts in competitive swimming , 1999 .

[2]  M. Voigt,et al.  Choice of jumping strategy in two standard jumps, squat and countermovement jump‐effect of training background or inherited preference? , 1999, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[3]  D G Lloyd,et al.  Net forces during tethered simulation of underwater streamlined gliding and kicking techniques of the freestyle turn , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  B. Blanksby,et al.  Traditional and modified exits following freestyle tumble turns by skilled swimmers , 2000 .

[5]  Oleg Verbitsky,et al.  TRACK START VS. GRAB START: EVIDENCE OF THE SYDNEY OLYMPIC GAMES , 2002 .

[6]  Young-Hoo Kwon.  Object Plane Deformation Due to Refraction in Two-Dimensional Underwater Motion Analysis , 1999 .

[7]  J. Massion,et al.  Kinematic synergies and equilibrium control during trunk movement under loaded and unloaded conditions , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  D. Landers,et al.  Sport and elite performers , 1986 .

[9]  M. Holthe,et al.  KINEMATIC COMPARISON OF GRAB AND TRACK STARTS IN SWIMMING , 2001 .

[10]  J. Chatard,et al.  Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX , 2003 .

[11]  Bruce Mason,et al.  SWIM START PERFORMANCES AT THE SYDNEY 2000 OLYMPIC GAMES , 2001 .

[12]  A. P. Hollander,et al.  Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VII , 1996 .

[13]  J. Massion,et al.  Axial synergies during human upper trunk bending , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Rod Havriluk.  Variability in Measurement of Swimming Forces , 2007, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  H. M. Karara,et al.  Direct Linear Transformation from Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates in Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2015 .

[16]  F. Alves.  Analysis of swimming races , 1994 .

[17]  Bruce Mason,et al.  WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM COMPETITION ANALYSIS AT THE 1999 PAN PACIFIC SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS , 2000 .

[18]  W. T. Dempster,et al.  The anthropometry of the manual work space for the seated subject. , 1959, American journal of physical anthropology.

[19]  J. Casebolt,et al.  Effects of light refraction on the accuracy of camera calibration and reconstruction in underwater motion analysis , 2006, Sports biomechanics.