ProtSA: a web application for calculating sequence specific protein solvent accessibilities in the unfolded ensemble

BackgroundThe stability of proteins is governed by the heat capacity, enthalpy and entropy changes of folding, which are strongly correlated to the change in solvent accessible surface area experienced by the polypeptide. While the surface exposed in the folded state can be easily determined, accessibilities for the unfolded state at the atomic level cannot be obtained experimentally and are typically estimated using simplistic models of the unfolded ensemble. A web application providing realistic accessibilities of the unfolded ensemble of a given protein at the atomic level will prove useful.ResultsProtSA, a web application that calculates sequence-specific solvent accessibilities of the unfolded state ensembles of proteins has been developed and made freely available to the scientific community. The input is the amino acid sequence of the protein of interest. ProtSA follows a previously published calculation protocol which uses the Flexible-Meccano algorithm to generate unfolded conformations representative of the unfolded ensemble of the protein, and uses the exact analytical software ALPHASURF to calculate atom solvent accessibilities, which are averaged on the ensemble.ConclusionProtSA is a novel tool for the researcher investigating protein folding energetics. The sequence specific atom accessibilities provided by ProtSA will allow obtaining better estimates of the contribution of the hydrophobic effect to the free energy of folding, will help to refine existing parameterizations of protein folding energetics, and will be useful to understand the influence of point mutations on protein stability.

[1]  Andrew D. Robertson,et al.  Protein Structure and the Energetics of Protein Stability. , 1997, Chemical reviews.

[2]  B. Matthews,et al.  Refined structure of Cro repressor protein from bacteriophage lambda suggests both flexibility and plasticity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  G. Rose,et al.  Assessing the solvent-dependent surface area of unfolded proteins using an ensemble model , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Martin Blackledge,et al.  Quantitative conformational analysis of partially folded proteins from residual dipolar couplings: application to the molecular recognition element of Sendai virus nucleoprotein. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Eran Eyal,et al.  Importance of solvent accessibility and contact surfaces in modeling side‐chain conformations in proteins , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structure of tumor suppressor p53 and its intrinsically disordered N-terminal transactivation domain , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  D. Goldenberg.  Computational simulation of the statistical properties of unfolded proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  A. Shrake,et al.  Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Pau Bernadó,et al.  Sequence-specific solvent accessibilities of protein residues in unfolded protein ensembles. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[12]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[13]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  G. Rose,et al.  Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. , 1985, Science.

[15]  M. Blackledge,et al.  Defining long-range order and local disorder in native alpha-synuclein using residual dipolar couplings. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  BPPred: A Web‐based computational tool for predicting biophysical parameters of proteins , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  Robert T. Sauer,et al.  Reverse hydrophobic effects relieved by amino-acid substitutions at a protein surface , 1990, Nature.

[18]  Pau Bernadó,et al.  A structural model for unfolded proteins from residual dipolar couplings and small-angle x-ray scattering. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  C. Pace,et al.  The Contribution of Polar Group Burial to Protein Stability Is Strongly Context-dependent* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  G D Rose,et al.  Modeling unfolded states of peptides and proteins. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[21]  R. L. Baldwin.  Energetics of protein folding. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  Feng Ding,et al.  Protein folding: then and now. , 2008, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[24]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.

[25]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  The weighted-volume derivative of a space-filling diagram , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  M. Levitt.  A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  C. Pace,et al.  Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: Relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  A M Lesk,et al.  Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Martin von Bergen,et al.  Highly populated turn conformations in natively unfolded tau protein identified from residual dipolar couplings and molecular simulation. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  G. Rose,et al.  Modeling unfolded states of proteins and peptides. II. Backbone solvent accessibility. , 1997, Biochemistry.