Stimulus familiarity and expectation jointly modulate neural activity in the visual ventral stream

Prior knowledge about the visual world can change how a visual stimulus is processed. Two forms of prior knowledge are often distinguished: stimulus familiarity (i.e., whether a stimulus has been seen before) and stimulus expectation (i.e., whether a stimulus is expected to occur, based on the context). Neurophysiological studies in monkeys have shown suppression of spiking activity both for expected and for familiar items in object-selective inferotemporal cortex. It is an open question, however, if and how these types of knowledge interact in their modulatory effects on the sensory response. To address this issue and to examine whether previous findings generalize to noninvasively measured neural activity in humans, we separately manipulated stimulus familiarity and expectation while noninvasively recording human brain activity using magnetoencephalography. We observed independent suppression of neural activity by familiarity and expectation, specifically in the lateral occipital complex, the putative human homologue of monkey inferotemporal cortex. Familiarity also led to sharpened response dynamics, which was predominantly observed in early visual cortex. Together, these results show that distinct types of sensory knowledge jointly determine the amount of neural resources dedicated to object processing in the visual ventral stream.

[1]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  R. Buckner The role of the hippocampus in prediction and imagination. , 2010, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[6]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Sources of adaptation of inferior temporal cortical responses , 2016, Cortex.

[7]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Charan Ranganath,et al.  Category expectation modulates baseline and stimulus-evoked activity in human inferotemporal cortex , 2009, Brain Research.

[10]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  R. Clark,et al.  Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. , 1998, Science.

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. , 1991, Science.

[13]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[14]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .

[15]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Expectation and Surprise Determine Neural Population Responses in the Ventral Visual Stream , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Unconscious associative learning with conscious cues , 2016, Neuroscience of consciousness.

[21]  A. Reber Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[22]  C. Olson,et al.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Implicit Perceptual Anticipation Triggered by Statistical Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  C. Olson,et al.  Prediction suppression and surprise enhancement in monkey inferotemporal cortex. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Statistical Learning Signals in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Floris P. de Lange,et al.  Expectation Suppression in Early Visual Cortex Depends on Task Set , 2015, PloS one.

[28]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[29]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Imaging the human motor system’s beta-band synchronization during isometric contraction , 2008, NeuroImage.

[30]  Felicia Y. Ng,et al.  Linking pattern completion in the hippocampus to predictive coding in visual cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Online and offline tools for head movement compensation in MEG , 2013, NeuroImage.

[32]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Predictability of what or where reduces brain activity, but a bottleneck occurs when both are predictable , 2018, NeuroImage.

[33]  C. Olson,et al.  Image familiarization sharpens response dynamics of neurons in inferotemporal cortex , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Expectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.