Workshop on Agricultural Air Quality: State of the science

Abstract The first Workshop on Agricultural Air Quality: State of the Science was held at the Bolger Center in Potomac, Maryland from 4 to 8 June 2006. This international conference assembled approximately 350 people representing 25 nations from 5 continents, with disciplines ranging from atmospheric chemistry to soil science. The workshop was designed as an open forum in which participants could openly exchange the most current knowledge and learn about numerous international perspectives regarding agricultural air quality. Participants represented many stakeholder groups concerned with the growing need to assess agricultural impacts on the atmosphere and to develop beneficial policies to improve air quality. The workshop focused on identifying methods to improve emissions inventories and best management practices for agriculture. Workshop participants also made recommendations for technological and methodological improvements in current emissions measurement and modeling practices. The workshop commenced with a session on agricultural emissions and was followed by international perspectives from the United States, Europe, Australia, India, and South America. This paper summarizes the findings and issues of the workshop and articulates future research needs. These needs were identified in three general areas: (1) improvement of emissions measurement; (2) development of appropriate emission factors; and (3) implementation of best management practices (BMPs) to minimize negative environmental impacts. Improvements in the appropriate measurements will inform decisions regarding US farming practices. A need was demonstrated for a national/international network to monitor atmospheric emissions from agriculture and their subsequent depositions to surrounding areas. Information collected through such a program may be used to assess model performance and could be critical for evaluating any future regulatory policies or BMPs. The workshop concluded that efforts to maximize benefits and reduce detrimental effects of agricultural production need to transcend disciplinary, geographic, and political boundaries. Also, such efforts should involve natural and social scientists, economists, engineers, business leaders, and decision makers. The workshop came to the conclusion that through these collaborative efforts improvements in air quality from agricultural practices will begin to take effect.

[1]  H. Paerl,et al.  ANTHROPOGENICALLY-DERIVED ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN DEPOSITION, MARINE EUTROPHICATION AND HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM EXPANSION : IS THERE A LINK? , 1999 .

[2]  B. Slattery,et al.  Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge, Future Needs; National Research Council of the National Academies; The National Academic Press, Washington, DC, 2003, 286 pages, paperback, ISBN 0-309-08705-8 (US$ 46) , 2005 .

[3]  P. Warneck Chemistry of the natural atmosphere , 1999 .

[4]  J. Houghton Climate change 1994 : radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emission scenarios , 1995 .

[5]  D. Dockery,et al.  Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[6]  Gregory D. Jennings,et al.  Emerging national research needs for agricultural air quality , 2006 .

[7]  M. Andreae Chapter 10 – Climatic effects of changing atmospheric aerosol levels , 1995 .

[8]  A. Bouwman Environmental science: Nitrogen oxides and tropical agriculture , 1998, Nature.

[9]  H. Paerl Coastal eutrophication in relation to atmospheric nitrogen deposition: Current perspectives , 1995 .

[10]  M. Nonnenmann,et al.  Vegetable oil sprinkling as a dust reduction method in swine confinement. , 2004, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[11]  Simon F. Watts,et al.  The mass budgets of carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, carbon disulfide and hydrogen sulfide , 2000 .

[12]  Viney P. Aneja,et al.  Agricultural ammonia emissions and ammonium concentrations associated with aerosols and precipitation in the southeast United States , 2003 .

[13]  W. Schlesinger Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change , 1991 .

[14]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Quantification of odors and odorants from swine operations in North Carolina , 2001 .

[15]  C. Delwiche,et al.  Denitrification, Nitrification, and Atmospheric Nitrous Oxide , 1981 .

[16]  Albert J. Heber,et al.  CONTROL OF AIR EMISSIONS FROM SWINE FINISHING BUILDINGS FLUSHED WITH RECYCLED LAGOON EFFLUENT , 2004 .

[17]  A. Bouwman,et al.  Uncertainties in the global source distribution of nitrous oxide , 1995 .

[18]  E. Cowling,et al.  The Nitrogen Cascade , 2003 .

[19]  P. Crutzen The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content , 1970 .

[20]  S S Schiffman,et al.  Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[21]  Wei‐Chyung Wang,et al.  Coupled effects of atmospheric N2O and O3 on the Earth's climate , 1980, Nature.

[22]  O. C. Taylor,et al.  Assessment of Crop Loss From Air Pollutants , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[23]  C. Swensson,et al.  Relationship between content of crude protein in rations for dairy cows and milk yield, concentration of urea in milk and ammonia emissions. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  William H. Schlesinger,et al.  A global budget for atmospheric NH3 , 1992 .

[25]  B W Mitchell,et al.  Reducing airborne pathogens, dust and Salmonella transmission in experimental hatching cabinets using an electrostatic space charge system. , 2002, Poultry science.

[26]  J. Levine Global biomass burning - Atmospheric, climatic, and biospheric implications , 1990 .

[27]  David Fowler,et al.  Atmospheric nitrogen compounds II: emissions, transport, transformation, deposition and assessment , 2001 .

[28]  J. Meisinger,et al.  Effect of adding alum or zeolite to dairy slurry on ammonia volatilization and chemical composition. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  M. Khalil,et al.  The global sources of nitrous oxide , 1992 .

[30]  Theo Demmers,et al.  Ammonia emission factors for UK agriculture. , 2000 .

[31]  D. Brabec,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF A HIGH-PRESSURE WATER-FOGGING SYSTEM IN CONTROLLING DUST EMISSIONS AT GRAIN RECEIVING , 2004 .

[32]  H. Takai,et al.  Dust levels and control methods in poultry houses. , 2000, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[33]  M. Vanotti,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Carbon Credits from Implementation of Aerobic Manure Treatment Systems in Swine Farms , 2006 .

[34]  Hans W. Paerl,et al.  Coastal eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: Importance of atmospheric deposition and groundwater as “new” nitrogen and other nutrient sources , 1997 .

[35]  V. Bille-Hansen,et al.  Dust Control in Pig Houses by Spraying Rapeseed Oil , 1995 .

[36]  S. Krupa Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review. , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[37]  Albert J. Heber,et al.  EFFECT OF A MANURE ADDITIVE ON AMMONIA EMISSION FROM SWINE FINISHING BUILDINGS , 2000 .