Risk‐based metrics for performance evaluation of control charts

[1]  Sven Knoth,et al.  The Art of Evaluating Monitoring Schemes — How to Measure the Performance of Control Charts? , 2006 .

[2]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 1986 .

[3]  Wilbert C.M. Kallenberg,et al.  Are estimated control charts in control? , 2001 .

[4]  Ron S. Kenett,et al.  On Assessing the Performance of Sequential Procedures for Detecting a Change , 2012, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[5]  Russell A. Boyles,et al.  Phase I Analysis for Autocorrelated Processes , 2000 .

[6]  Stefan H. Steiner,et al.  An Overview of Phase I Analysis for Process Improvement and Monitoring , 2014 .

[7]  Christian H. Weiß,et al.  EWMA Monitoring of Correlated Processes of Poisson Counts , 2009 .

[8]  Sven Knoth.  Run length quantiles of EWMA control charts monitoring normal mean or/and variance , 2015 .

[9]  Axel Gandy,et al.  Guaranteed Conditional Performance of Control Charts via Bootstrap Methods , 2011, 1111.4180.

[10]  D. Tasche,et al.  On the coherence of expected shortfall , 2001, cond-mat/0104295.

[11]  Murat Caner Testik,et al.  Conditional and marginal performance of the Poisson CUSUM control chart with parameter estimation , 2007 .

[12]  Murat Caner Testik,et al.  CUSUM Monitoring of First-Order Integer-Valued Autoregressive Processes of Poisson Counts , 2009 .

[13]  Jaime Mosquera,et al.  Simultaneously guaranteeing the in‐control and out‐of‐control performances of the S2 control chart with estimated variance , 2018, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[14]  Bing Xing Wang,et al.  The Design of the S2 Control Charts Based on Conditional Performance via Exact Methods , 2017, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[15]  D. A. Evans,et al.  An approach to the probability distribution of cusum run length , 1972 .

[16]  E. S. Page.  CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .

[17]  Rainer Göb,et al.  Estimating value at risk and conditional value at risk for count variables , 2011, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..