Endangered species conservation on private land: Assessing the effectiveness of habitat conservation plans

Habitat conservation plans (HCPs) have become a key instrument for implementation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on private land. However, there is no systematic analysis of their effectiveness in promoting endangered species recovery. This paper is the first to provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of HCPs on species recovery status. We find evidence that HCPs have a significant positive impact on species recovery. Our results also suggest that the recovery benefits are larger when species have relatively larger plans. However, we fail to find strong evidence that multi-species plans covering more species are more effective than plans which include fewer species.

[1]  G. Imbens,et al.  Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects , 2004 .

[2]  J. Michael,et al.  Preemptive Habitat Destruction under the Endangered Species Act* , 2003, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[3]  Christian Langpap.  Conservation of Endangered Species: Can Incentives Work for Private Landowners? , 2006 .

[4]  J. List,et al.  Is the Endangered Species Act Endangering Species? , 2006 .

[5]  Tommaso Nannicini,et al.  Simulation-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Matching Estimators , 2006 .

[6]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING , 1994 .

[7]  B. Noon,et al.  Mitigation of Habitat “Take”: Application to Habitat Conservation Planning , 1997 .

[8]  P. Kareiva,et al.  How Good Are Endangered Species Recovery Plans? , 2001 .

[9]  P. Frijters,et al.  How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness? , 2004 .

[10]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data , 1979 .

[11]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[12]  Paul McErlain-Ward.  Science and the Endangered Species Act , 1996 .

[13]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[14]  M. Bean,et al.  Measuring progress in US endangered species conservation. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[15]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Transition Data: Survival Analysis , 2005 .

[16]  S. Polasky,et al.  When the Truth Hurts: Endangered Species Policy on Private Land with Imperfect Information☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[17]  Lawrence E. Blume,et al.  The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid? , 1984 .

[18]  Robert Innes,et al.  The economics of takings and compensation when land and its public use value are in private hands , 2000 .

[19]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  The Selection Problem , 1990 .

[20]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  The effectiveness of the US endangered species act: An econometric analysis using matching methods , 2007 .

[21]  Robert Innes,et al.  Takings, Compensation, and Equal Treatment for Owners of Developed and Undeveloped Property1 , 1997, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Takings, Compensation and Endangered Species Protection on Private Lands , 1998 .

[23]  K. Shawn Smallwood,et al.  Indicators Assessment for Habitat Conservation Plan of Yolo County, California, USA , 1998, Environmental management.

[24]  Junjie Wu,et al.  Voluntary conservation of endangered species: when does no regulatory assurance mean no conservation? , 2004 .

[25]  David S. Wilcove,et al.  The Private-Land Problem , 1997 .

[26]  M. Groom,et al.  Science and Uncertainty in Habitat Conservation Planning , 2001 .

[27]  G. Imbens,et al.  Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects , 2011 .

[28]  Myoung‐jae Lee.  Micro-Econometrics for Policy, Program, and Treatment Effects , 2005 .

[29]  A. Ichino,et al.  From Temporary Help Jobs to Permanent Employment: What Can We Learn from Matching Estimators and Their Sensitivity? , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  J. Rachlinski,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis , 2005 .

[31]  J. Diffendorfer,et al.  Species Coverage in Multispecies Habitat Conservation Plans: Where's the Science? , 2006 .

[32]  Donna K. Ginther,et al.  Alternative Estimates of the Effect of Schooling on Earnings , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[33]  B. Elderd,et al.  The Scientific Foundations of Habitat Conservation Plans: a Quantitative Assessment , 2001 .

[34]  Christian Langpap,et al.  Allocating Conservation Resources Under the Endangered Species Act , 2010 .

[35]  F. Shilling.  Do Habitat Conservation Plans Protect Endangered Species , 1997 .

[36]  Christian Langpap,et al.  Learning from endangered and threatened species recovery programs: A case study using U.S. Endangered Species Act recovery scores , 2007 .

[37]  J. B. Ruhl.  How to Kill Endangered Species, Legally: The Nuts and Bolts of Endangered Species Act 'HCP' Permits for Real Estate Development , 1999 .