Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming

This study investigated whether bilinguals simultaneously activate phonological representations from both of their languages when reading words in just one. The critical stimuli were interlingual homographs (e.g., PAIN) that were low in frequency in the target language of the study (English) and high in frequency in the nontarget language (French). Both English-French and French-English bilinguals were tested. In each experiment, participants named a block of English experimental words, a block of French filler words, and then a second block of English experimental words. In the first block of English trials, the English-French bilinguals had similar naming latencies for homographs and English-only control words, although they made more errors on homographs. In contrast, the French-English bilinguals showed a homograph disadvantage in both the latency and error data. In the second block of English trials, both the English-French bilinguals and the French-English bilinguals showed homograph interference on latency and error measures. We interpret these results as indicating that the activation of phonological representations can appear to be both language-specific and nonspecific, depending on the characteristics of the bilingual and whether they have recently named words in the nontarget language.

[1]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Simulating cross-language competition with the bilingual interactive activation model. , 1998 .

[2]  D. Green,et al.  Interlingual homograph interference in German–English bilinguals: Its modulation and locus of control , 2002, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[3]  Debra Jared,et al.  Spelling-Sound Consistency Affects the Naming of High-Frequency Words , 1997 .

[4]  S. Lupker,et al.  Strategic Control in a Naming Task: Changing Routes or Changing Deadlines? , 1997 .

[5]  S. Lupker,et al.  Phonological effects in visual word recognition: investigating the impact of feedback activation. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[7]  S. Lupker,et al.  The Processing of Interlexical Homographs in Translation Recognition and Lexical Decision: Support for Non-Selective Access to Bilingual Memory , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Alan H. Kawamoto,et al.  Pronunciation of homographs , 1992 .

[9]  F. Grosjean Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues , 1998, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[10]  J. Kroll,et al.  Do Bilinguals Activate Phonological Representations in One or Both of Their Languages When Naming Words , 2001 .

[11]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  J. Grainger,et al.  On the Representation and Use of Language Information in Bilinguals , 1992 .

[13]  D. Jared Spelling-Sound Consistency and Regularity Effects in Word Naming , 2002 .

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[16]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[17]  J. Grainger,et al.  Recognition of Cognates and Interlingual Homographs: The Neglected Role of Phonology , 1999 .

[18]  K Rayner,et al.  The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Visual word recognition in bilinguals: evidence from masked phonological priming. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  K. Forster,et al.  Translation priming with different scripts: masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The basis of consistency effects in word naming , 1990 .

[22]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[23]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing , 1998, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[25]  F. Grosjean The Bilingual's Language Modes. , 2001 .

[26]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[28]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. , 1989 .

[29]  D. Klein,et al.  Phonological Processing in Bilingual Word Recognition , 1992 .

[30]  S. Lupker,et al.  Sequential effects in naming: a time-criterion account. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. , 1998 .

[32]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  More on interlingual homograph recognition: language intermixing versus explicitness of instruction , 2000, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[33]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .

[34]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition , 1998 .

[35]  G. Nas,et al.  Visual word recognition in bilinguals: evidence for a cooperation between visual and sound based codes during access to a common lexical store , 1983 .

[36]  P. Mousty,et al.  Brulex: une base de donne 'es lexicales informatise 'e pour le franc?ais e 'crit et parle , 1990 .

[37]  G O Stone,et al.  Reading homographs: orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .