The 'materials balance approach' to pollution: its origin, implications and acceptance

In their seminal paper on "production, consumption and externalities" (AER, 1969), Ayres and Kneese initiated a research program on comprehensive analysis and management of residuals and pollution based on two pillars: the study of the residuals-generating materials flow subject to the mass balance principle and the concept of pervasive (pollution) externality. The present paper aims at (i) recalling the origin of that program, (ii) sheding some light on its principal implications from today's perspective and (iii) giving a tentative assessment on how it has been received by environmental and resource economists over the last decades. It is argued that while the externality approach to pollution gained widespread acceptance, the research community was rather reluctant in following Ayres and Kneese's 'material balance approach'. It is shown that neglecting the mass balance principle may - but need not always - lead to flawed policy advice.

[1]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .

[2]  R. Pethig Environmental Management in General Equilibrium: A New Incentive Compatible Approach , 1979 .

[3]  Stefan Baumgärtner Ambivalent Joint Production and the Natural Environment: An Economic and Thermodynamic Analysis , 2000 .

[4]  Rüdiger Pethig,et al.  Product Design and efficient Management of Recycling and Waste Treatment , 1999 .

[5]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  Computable General equilibrium Models in Environmental and Resource Economics , 2001 .

[6]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  The Economics of Residential Solid Waste Management , 1999 .

[7]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Dynamic Macro Modelling and Materials Balance: Economic-Environmental Integration for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[8]  D. Fullerton,et al.  Policies for Green Design , 1996 .

[9]  R. Mooij,et al.  Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation. , 1994 .

[10]  Margaret Walls,et al.  Upstream Pollution, Downstream Waste Disposal, and the Design of Comprehensive Environmental Policies , 2001 .

[11]  G. Debreu,et al.  Theory of Value , 1959 .

[12]  K. Kapp ENVIRONMENTAL DISRUPTION AND SOCIAL COSTS: A CHALLENGE TO ECONOMICS , 1970 .

[13]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Joint Production, Externalities, and the Regulation of Production Networks , 2000 .

[14]  C. Perrings Conservation of mass and instability in a dynamic economy-environment system , 1986 .

[15]  Joseph E. Stiglitz,et al.  Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths , 1974 .

[16]  R. Pethig Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of Comparative Advantage , 1976 .

[17]  M. Faber Capital and time in ecological economics : neo-Austrian modelling , 1999 .

[18]  Theodore C. Bergstrom,et al.  How to Discard Free Disposability--At No Cost , 1976 .

[19]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[20]  Stefan Baumgärtner Ambivalent Joint Production and the Natural Environment , 2000 .

[21]  宮永 昌男,et al.  A.V.クネ-ゼ他共著「経済学と環境--物質収支によるアプロ-チ」(A.V.Kneese,R.U.Ayres,R.C.D.Arge;Economics and the Environment,A Materials Balance Approach,1970) (国際化時代の産業組織--その変革の方向) , 1974 .

[22]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Goals, Commitment, and Identity , 1985 .

[23]  R. Pethig On the Future of Environmental Economics , 1999 .

[24]  G. Debreu Theory of value : an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium , 1960 .

[25]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  The control of resources. , 1983 .

[26]  Olli Tahvonen,et al.  Economic growth, pollution, and renewable resources , 1993 .

[27]  Allen V. Kneese,et al.  Economics and the environment , 1977 .

[28]  Michael A. Toman,et al.  Progress and Problems in the Economics of Sustainability , 2002 .

[29]  A. Vatn Input versus Emission Taxes: Environmental Taxes in a Mass Balance and Transaction Costs Perspective , 1998 .

[30]  Dodo J. Thampapillai,et al.  Environmental Economics , 2019 .

[31]  T. Eichner,et al.  Recycling, Producer Responsibility and Centralized Waste Management , 2001 .