Frames of reference for anticipatory action in 4-month-old infants.

The spatial representations of 4-month-old infants were examined in two experiments using a modified version of the visual expectation paradigm (VExP). The experiments were designed in order to determine what spatial frames of reference were available to infants for making anticipatory saccades. In Experiment 1, we found that infants most often used a retinocentric frame of reference that did not take into account their current eye position in making an anticipatory saccade. However, Experiment 2 revealed that under certain conditions infants are more likely to make anticipatory saccades consistent with a body- or object-centred frame of reference. The main difference between the two experiments was the degree to which the featural properties of the stimuli varied. The results shed light on the development of spatial representations for action in infancy.

[1]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Retinotopic organization of human visual cortex mapped with positron- emission tomography , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  Spatial errors made by infants: inadequate spatial cues or evidence of egocentrism? , 1978, British journal of psychology.

[3]  Marshall M. Haith,et al.  The Nature of Infants' Visual Expectations for Event Content , 2003 .

[4]  L. Acredolo Development of Spatial Orientation in Infancy. , 1978 .

[5]  J. Gavin Bremner,et al.  Egocentric Versus Allocentric Spatial Coding in Nine-Month-Old Infants: Factors Influencing the Choice of Code , 1978 .

[6]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  Amy Needham,et al.  Objective spatial coding by 6.5‐month‐old infants in a visual dishabituation task , 1999 .

[8]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning , 2000 .

[10]  Rick O. Gilmore,et al.  Egocentric Action in Early Infancy: Spatial Frames of Reference for Saccades , 1997 .

[11]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Spatial representation and attention in toddlers with Williams syndrome and Down syndrome , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Object-centered attention in 8-month-old infants , 1998 .

[13]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  Place versus response as the basis of spatial errors made by young infants. , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[15]  L. Acredolo,et al.  Laboratory versus home: The effect of environment on the 9-month-old infant's choice of spatial reference system. , 1979 .

[16]  M. Haith,et al.  Spatiotemporal Regularity and Interevent Contingencies as Information for Infants' Visual Expectations. , 2002, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[17]  M. Haith,et al.  Expectation and anticipation of dynamic visual events by 3.5-month-old babies. , 1988, Child development.

[18]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Body-centered representations for visually-guided action emerge during early infancy , 1997, Cognition.

[19]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Multimodal events and moving locations: eye movements of adults and 6-month-olds reveal dynamic spatial indexing. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.