Classifying relationship structures: relationship strength in industrial markets

Although many authors examine relationships, few attempt to classify alternative structures. In this research a relationship strength construct is developed to distinguish among alternative relationship structures based on a key mediating variable set derived from an assessment of the dominant behavior process and economic content variables underlying important buyer‐seller relationships. Results using a cluster analysis procedure based on a sample of 200 industrial company respondents from the UK engineering, electronic and telecommunications sectors support the classification. This allows us to discriminate between four relationship structures in main buyer‐supplier relationships, which are labeled: bilateral, recurrent, dominant partner, and discrete. Such a classification can provide managers with a mechanism for analyzing and planning for the development of their inter‐firm relationships.

[1]  Evert Gummesson,et al.  Relationship marketing and imaginary organizations: a synthesis , 1996 .

[2]  Mari Sako,et al.  Price, Quality and Trust: Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan , 1992 .

[3]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[4]  Björn Wootz,et al.  A framework of industrial buying and selling , 1979 .

[5]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[6]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Just-In-Time Exchange Relationships in Industrial Markets , 1988 .

[7]  F. Webster The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation , 1992 .

[8]  G. John,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of Key Informant Data from Dyadic Relationships in Marketing Channels , 1982 .

[9]  Gregory T. Gundlach,et al.  The Structure of Commitment in Exchange , 1995 .

[10]  W. Ouchi,et al.  THE ORGANIZATION OF INNOVATION IN THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN: NEOCLASSICAL AND RELATIONAL CONTRACTING* , 1994 .

[11]  C. Oliver Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[12]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships: , 1987 .

[13]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[14]  Patrizia Zagnoli,et al.  Patterns of international R&D cooperation for new product development: the Olivetti multimedia product , 1994 .

[15]  D. Whetten,et al.  The Instrumental Value of Interorganizational Relations: Antecedents and Consequences of Linkage Formation. Faculty Working Paper No. 454. , 1977 .

[16]  David Wilemon,et al.  Strategic Partnering for Developing New Products , 1996 .

[17]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[18]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  R. Kanter Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances , 1994 .

[21]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[22]  Jae-Ho Hyun,et al.  Buyer-supplier relations in the European automobile component industry , 1994 .

[23]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[24]  John M. Longshore The Management of Strategic Change , 1990 .

[25]  S. Ross The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem , 1973 .

[26]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Relational Exchange Norms, Perceptions of Unfairness, and Retained Hostility in Commercial Litigation , 1988 .

[27]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[28]  Howard Thomas,et al.  Theories of the Firm - Implications for Strategy Research , 1994 .

[29]  C. Lane,et al.  The Social Constitution of Trust: Supplier Relations in Britain and Germany , 1996 .

[30]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after , 1995 .

[31]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[32]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[33]  M. Bergen,et al.  Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories , 1992 .

[34]  B. Williams The new social contract , 1967 .

[35]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange , 1995 .

[36]  S. Hunt,et al.  Organizational Commitment: One of Many Commitments or Key Mediating Construct? , 1994 .

[37]  R. Hall Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes , 1987 .

[38]  B. Husted,et al.  Transaction Costs, Norms, and Social Networks , 1994 .

[39]  D. Campbell The Informant in Quantitative Research , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Charles R. O'Neal,et al.  Buyer-seller relationships in just-in-time purchasing environments , 1994 .

[41]  R. Rothschild,et al.  Foundations of Corporate Success: How Business Strategies add Value. , 1996 .

[42]  Mari Sako,et al.  Supplier Relations in Japan and the United States , 1995 .

[43]  Allen Kaufman,et al.  How Hadco Became a Problem-Solving Supplier , 1996 .

[44]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[45]  Jeffrey L. Bradach,et al.  Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms , 1989 .