Improving novice analyst performance in modeling the sequence diagram in systems analysis: A cognitive complexity approach

[1]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[2]  Bran Selic.  Turning clockwise: using UML in the real-time domain , 1999, CACM.

[3]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[4]  John W. Satzinger,et al.  Contemporary Approaches and Techniques for the Systems Analyst , 2006, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[5]  Cris Kobryn.  UML 2001: a standardization odyssey , 1999, CACM.

[6]  J. G. Schuurman,et al.  Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. , 2002 .

[7]  J. Sweller,et al.  Structuring Effective Worked Examples , 1990 .

[8]  Cris Kobryn,et al.  Architecting Systems with UML 2.0 , 2003, IEEE Softw..

[9]  Paul Kline,et al.  An easy guide to factor analysis , 1993 .

[10]  Nigel Bevan,et al.  Measuring usability as quality of use , 1995, Software Quality Journal.

[11]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[12]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  Cognition and Complexity: The Cognitive Science of Managing Complexity , 1997 .

[15]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  The REA Accounting Model: Intellectual Heritage and Prospects for Progress , 1995 .

[16]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[18]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Influence of Computer Attitude and Self-Efficacy on IT Usage Behavior , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[20]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[21]  Keng Siau,et al.  Theoretical vs. Practical Complexity: The Case of UML , 2005, J. Database Manag..

[22]  Dinesh Batra,et al.  Comparing a rule-based approach with a pattern-based approach at different levels of complexity of conceptual data modelling tasks , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Dinesh Batra,et al.  A conceptual database design approach based on rules and heuristics , 1994 .

[24]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[25]  Anne Morris,et al.  The problem of information overload in business organisations: a review of the literature , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Bran Selic,et al.  Evolution, not revolution , 2002, CACM.

[27]  Mark M. Misic,et al.  Reading between the lines: an examination of systems analysis and design texts , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[28]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[29]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[30]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Human Factors Research on Data Modeling: A Review of Prior Research, An Extended Framework and Future Research Directions , 2002, J. Database Manag..

[31]  Craig Larman,et al.  Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and Iterative Development (3rd Edition) , 1997 .

[32]  S. Owen,et al.  Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale , 1989 .

[33]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management , 1989 .

[34]  Mark E. McMurtrey,et al.  Introducing task-based general computer self-efficacy: An empirical comparison of three general self-efficacy instruments , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[35]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  An ontological analysis of the economic primitives of the extended-REA enterprise information architecture , 2002, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[36]  T. Busch.  Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers , 1995 .

[37]  Laura Hall,et al.  Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: An empirical study , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[38]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[39]  Dov Dori.  Why significant UML change is unlikely , 2002, CACM.

[40]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[42]  Krista E. DeLeeuw,et al.  A Comparison of Three Measures of Cognitive Load: Evidence for Separable Measures of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Load , 2008 .

[43]  Narasimha Bolloju,et al.  Assisting novice analysts in developing quality conceptual models with UML , 2006, CACM.

[44]  Craig Larman,et al.  Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process , 2001 .

[45]  Yoris A. Au.  Design Science I: The Role of Design Science in Electronic Commerce Research , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[47]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING , 1989 .

[48]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  Jeffery D. Wilfong.  Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Understanding and measuring user competence , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[51]  Keng Siau,et al.  Identifying Difficulties in Learning Uml , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[52]  Peretz Shoval,et al.  Quality and comprehension of UML interaction diagrams-an experimental comparison , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[53]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[54]  Reiner R. Dumke,et al.  UML-Based Performance Engineering Possibilities and Techniques , 2002, IEEE Softw..

[55]  Peter P. Chen.  The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, VLDB '75.

[56]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[57]  Nicholas P. Vitalari,et al.  Differences Between Novice and Expert Systems Analysts: What Do We Know and What Do We Do? , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Iseult White.  Using the Booch Method: A Rational Approach , 1994 .

[59]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training , 1994 .

[60]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The Unified Modeling Language User Guide , 1998, J. Database Manag..

[61]  Alex E. Bell.  Death by UML Fever , 2004, ACM Queue.

[62]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[63]  Doug Rosenberg,et al.  Use case driven object modeling with UML: a practical approach , 1999 .

[64]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[65]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[66]  Alex E. Bell,et al.  UMLoquent expression of AWACS software design , 1999, CACM.

[67]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[68]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[69]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Object-oriented modeling with UML: a study of developers' perceptions , 2003, CACM.

[70]  P. Chandler,et al.  Evidence for Cognitive Load Theory , 1991 .

[71]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[72]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Managing Cognitive Load--Recent Trends in Cognitive Load Theory. Commentary. , 2002 .

[73]  Grady Booch.  UML in action , 1999, CACM.

[74]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The Unified Software Development Process , 1999 .

[75]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[76]  Karsten Rex,et al.  The Relationship of Computer Experience and Computer Self-Efficacy to Performance in Introductory Computer Literacy Courses , 1998 .

[77]  Joaquin Miller,et al.  WHAT UML SHOULD BE , 2002 .

[78]  T. J. Teorey,et al.  A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model , 1986, CSUR.

[79]  Luciano Lavagno,et al.  Embedded UML: a merger of real-time UML and co-design , 2001, Ninth International Symposium on Hardware/Software Codesign. CODES 2001 (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8571).

[80]  Colin Atkinson,et al.  An experimental comparison of reading techniques for defect detection in UML design documents , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[81]  Denise Potosky,et al.  A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[82]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  Dimensions of UML Diagram Use: A Survey of Practitioners , 2008, J. Database Manag..

[83]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[84]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[85]  Hans Eriksson,et al.  Business Modeling With UML: Business Patterns at Work , 2000 .

[86]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  How UML is used , 2006, CACM.

[87]  Jim Conallen,et al.  Modeling Web application architectures with UML , 1999, CACM.

[88]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[89]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[90]  A. F. Salam,et al.  An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[91]  R. Catrambone,et al.  Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? * , 2006 .

[92]  Mark J. Brosnan,et al.  The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[93]  Dániel Varró,et al.  VIATRA - visual automated transformations for formal verification and validation of UML models , 2002, Proceedings 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering,.

[94]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[95]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[96]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[97]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  Object-oriented software engineering - a use case driven approach , 1993, TOOLS.

[98]  Dániel Varró,et al.  Designing the automatic transformation of visual languages , 2002, Sci. Comput. Program..

[99]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[100]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[101]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[102]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[103]  Scott W. Ambler,et al.  The Object Primer: Agile Model-Driven Development with UML 2.0 , 2004 .

[104]  J. Pine,et al.  Chunking mechanisms in human learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[105]  Alistair Cockburn,et al.  Patterns for Effective Use Cases , 2002 .

[106]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures , 2004 .

[107]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program , 1996 .

[108]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[109]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[110]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[111]  Gretchen Irwin,et al.  An Ontological Analysis of Use Case Modeling Grammar , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[112]  John D. Mcgregor,et al.  Using Guided Inspection to Validate UML Models , 1999 .

[113]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Cognitive skill acquisition. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[114]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[115]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction , 1998 .

[116]  Keng Siau,et al.  Theoretical and practical complexity of modeling methods , 2007, CACM.

[117]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  Understanding the Role of Use Cases in UML: A Review and Research Agenda , 2000, J. Database Manag..

[118]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  The REA Modeling Approach to Teaching Accounting Information Systems , 2003 .

[119]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Goal Configurations and Processing Strategies as Moderators Between Instructional Design and Cognitive Load: Evidence From Hypertext-Based Instruction , 2003 .

[120]  P. Ackerman.  Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. , 1988 .

[121]  Allison W. Harrison,et al.  An Examination of the Factor Structures and Concurrent Validities for the Computer Attitude Scale, the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale , 1992 .

[122]  Alistair Cockburn,et al.  Writing Effective Use Cases , 2000 .

[123]  Kurt W. Derr.  Applying Omt: A Practical Step-By-Step Guide to Using the Object Modeling Technique , 1995 .

[124]  Bran Selic,et al.  A Generic Framework for Modeling Resources with UML , 2000, Computer.

[125]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[126]  Casper E. Wiggins,et al.  OOREA: An Object-Oriented Resources, Events, Agents Model for Enterprise Systems Design , 2004, ICIS.

[127]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.