Inference on network statistics by restricting to the network space: applications to sexual history data

Analysis of sexual history data intended to describe sexual networks presents many challenges arising from the fact that most surveys collect information on only a very small fraction of the population of interest. In addition, partners are rarely identified and responses are subject to reporting biases. Typically, each network statistic of interest, such as mean number of sexual partners for men or women, is estimated independently of other network statistics. There is, however, a complex relationship among networks statistics; and knowledge of these relationships can aid in addressing concerns mentioned earlier. We develop a novel method that constrains a posterior predictive distribution of a collection of network statistics in order to leverage the relationships among network statistics in making inference about network properties of interest. The method ensures that inference on network properties is compatible with an actual network. Through extensive simulation studies, we also demonstrate that use of this method can improve estimates in settings where there is uncertainty that arises both from sampling and from systematic reporting bias compared with currently available approaches to estimation. To illustrate the method, we apply it to estimate network statistics using data from the Chicago Health and Social Life Survey. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Fortmann,et al.  Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[2]  Catherine MacPhail,et al.  Keep them in school: the importance of education as a protective factor against HIV infection among young South African women. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  M. Handcock,et al.  Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[4]  N. McGrath,et al.  Reported number of sexual partners: comparison of data from four African longitudinal studies , 2009, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[5]  A. Ghani,et al.  Risks of Acquiring and Transmitting Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Sexual Partner Networks , 2000, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[6]  Ravi Goyal,et al.  Sampling networks from their posterior predictive distribution , 2014, Network Science.

[7]  S Q Muth,et al.  Prostitution and the sex discrepancy in reported number of sexual partners. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Benjamin Armbruster,et al.  The reliability of sexual partnership histories: implications for the measurement of partnership concurrency during surveys , 2011, AIDS.

[9]  A. Ghani,et al.  The Role of Sexual Partnership Networks in the Epidemiology of Gonorrhea , 1997, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[10]  Martina Morris,et al.  Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health practice. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[11]  Martina Morris,et al.  A microsimulation study of the effect of concurrent partnerships on the spread of HIV in Uganda , 2000 .

[12]  M Kretzschmar,et al.  Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.

[13]  Jeffrey W. Eaton,et al.  HIV Treatment as Prevention: Considerations in the Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials of Combination HIV Prevention , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[14]  M E J Newman Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[15]  Jeffrey W. Eaton,et al.  HPTN 071 (PopART): A Cluster-Randomized Trial of the Population Impact of an HIV Combination Prevention Intervention Including Universal Testing and Treatment: Mathematical Model , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  Martina Morris,et al.  Concurrent Partnerships, Acute Infection and HIV Epidemic Dynamics Among Young Adults in Zimbabwe , 2012, AIDS and Behavior.

[17]  Stefan D Baral,et al.  Stochastic variation in network epidemic models: implications for the design of community level HIV prevention trials , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  V. De Gruttola,et al.  Sample size considerations in the design of cluster randomized trials of combination HIV prevention , 2014, Clinical trials.

[19]  M. Newman Spread of epidemic disease on networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.