Benevolent sexism toward men: Its social legitimation and preference for male candidates

The present research investigated the relationship between system justification beliefs and the endorsement of ambivalent sexist attitudes toward men. In Study 1 (web-based questionnaire, N = 220) we explored the relationship between system justification (SJ), and hostile and benevolent attitudes toward men (HM and BM). Results showed that SJ was positively related to BM but not to HM. In Study 2 (paper-and-pencil questionnaire, N = 158), we tested the mediating role played by BM and HM in the relationship between SJ and the preference for male candidates. We replicated Study 1 results and showed that BM, but not HM, was positively related to the dependent variable; moreover SJ exerted an indirect and positive effect on the preference for male candidates as mediated by BM. Finally, supplementary analyses showed that the relationship between SJ and BM was positive and significant for women only. Results are discussed in light of system justification theory and of BM as an additional form of legitimization and maintenance of the status quo.

[1]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations , 2011 .

[2]  C. Volpato,et al.  L'atteggiamento ambivalente verso donne e uomini. Un contributo alla validazione delle scale ASI e AMI , 2008 .

[3]  Andrew N. Christopher,et al.  Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Sexism, and Prejudice Toward Women in the Workforce , 2008 .

[4]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  E‐Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet , 2002 .

[5]  Andrew N. Christopher,et al.  Conservative Ideology and Ambivalent Sexism , 2006 .

[6]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Chris G Sibley,et al.  Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: The Dual Roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[8]  E. Plutzer,et al.  IDENTITY POLITICS, PARTISANSHIP, AND VOTING FOR WOMEN CANDIDATES , 1996 .

[9]  Bilian Ni Sullivan,et al.  Social Inequality and the Reduction of Ideological Dissonance on Behalf of the System: Evidence of Enhanced System Justification among the Disadvantaged , 2001 .

[10]  S. Russo,et al.  The Role of Legitimizing Ideologies as Predictors of Ambivalent Sexism in Young People: Evidence from Italy and the USA , 2013 .

[11]  S. Lemon,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism , 2001 .

[12]  María del Prado Silván-Ferrero,et al.  Benevolent Sexism Toward Men and Women: Justification of the Traditional System and Conventional Gender Roles in Spain , 2007 .

[13]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[14]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  Mediation analysis. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Kira Sanbonmatsu.  Gender stereotypes and vote choice , 2002 .

[17]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo , 2004 .

[18]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[20]  P. Glick,et al.  Hostility Toward Men and the Perceived Stability of Male Dominance , 2010 .

[21]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  M. Banaji,et al.  The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness , 1994 .

[23]  Kathleen Dolan.  Voting for Women in the “Year of the Woman” , 1998 .

[24]  A. Roets,et al.  Is Sexism a Gender Issue? A Motivated Social Cognition Perspective on Men's and Women's Sexist Attitudes toward Own and Other Gender , 2012 .

[25]  J. Jost.  System Justification Theory as Compliment, Complement, and Corrective to Theories of Social Identification and Social Dominance , 2001 .

[26]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  System justification: How do we know it’s motivated? , 2010 .

[27]  J. Jost,et al.  System-Justifying Functions of Complementary Regional and Ethnic Stereotypes: Cross-National Evidence , 2005 .

[28]  Thomas Eckes,et al.  Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.