Effector system-specific sequential modulations of congruency effects

Congruency effects in conflict tasks are reliably reduced after experiencing conflict, that is, following incongruent trials. Such sequential modulations (sometimes referred to as the Gratton effect) indicate the operation of conflict adaptation mechanisms. The influential conflict monitoring hypothesis suggested that after conflict the processing of relevant stimulus dimensions is increased. Alternatively, it was suggested that the influence of automatic response activation is suppressed following conflict. In two experiments, participants worked on the same cognitive task (Experiment 1: Eriksen flanker; Experiment 2: Simon) with the same kind of stimulation. A cue indicated whether they should respond with the hands or the feet. When the effector system repeated from the previous trial, a sequential modulation was reliably observed. When the effector system switched, however, the sequential modulation collapsed. These results are taken to argue for the suppression of effector system-specific response activations as a consequence of experiencing conflict. Alternative interpretations in terms of task-set and/or context switches are discussed.

[1]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[3]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[5]  R. D. de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M Eimer,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  G D Logan,et al.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[9]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[10]  E. Soetens,et al.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  Advance movement preparation of eye, foot, and hand: a comparative study using movement-related brain potentials. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: a lateralized event-related potential study , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Peter Wühr,et al.  Sequential modulations of logical-recoding operations in the Simon task. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[15]  P. Wühr,et al.  The Simon effect in vocal responses. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[16]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  H. Leuthold,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for response priming and conflict regulation in the auditory Simon task , 2006, Brain Research.

[18]  T. Egner Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[20]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Cognitive control acts locally , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  T. Egner Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  E. Hazeltine,et al.  Conflict adaptation depends on task structure. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Hillary D. Schwarb,et al.  The boundaries of sequential modulations: evidence for set-level control. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  H. Müller,et al.  Conflict-specific effects of accessory stimuli on cognitive control in the Stroop task and the Simon task. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[26]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules , 2013, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[27]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[28]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[29]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  K. Willmes,et al.  Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Grounding cognitive control in associative learning. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.