Development of Cognitive and Affective Trust in Teams

The present research examines the development of two dimensions of trust, cognitive and affective, in student project teams over the course of a semester. Empirical examination of the evolution of multidimensional trust and its unique antecedents was explored. The results show that early trust emerges as a one-dimensional factor early in the life span of a team; cognitive and affective trust emerge as separate components over time; unique and distinct predictors positively and negatively affect early trust, cognitive trust, and affective trust; and affective trust has a stronger positive relationship with team performance than cognitive trust.

[1]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Business on a handshake , 1992 .

[2]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[3]  D. Ferrin,et al.  When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation , 2006 .

[4]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[5]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust , 1993 .

[6]  L. Zucker Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[7]  Dan S. Chiaburu,et al.  Extra‐role behaviors challenging the status‐quo , 2006 .

[8]  Devon S. Johnson,et al.  Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships , 2005 .

[9]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[11]  R. Mayer,et al.  IN MANAGEMENT , 2006 .

[12]  J. Clawson,et al.  Leading Teams , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Trust and technologies: Implications for organizational work practices , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Extending the Faultline Model to Geographically Dispersed Teams: How Colocated Subgroups can Impair Group Functioning , 2006 .

[16]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[17]  Claus W. Langfred The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects tf Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams , 2007 .

[18]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[19]  K. Dirks The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Silence speaks volumes: the effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations. , 2007, Journal of Applied Psychology.

[21]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. , 1995 .

[22]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[23]  Melanie J. Ashleigh,et al.  The Effects of Team-Skills Training on Transactive Memory and Performance , 2007 .

[24]  Michele Williams In Whom we Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development , 2001 .

[25]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[26]  R. Klimoski,et al.  Client–project manager engagements, trust, and loyalty , 2004 .

[27]  J. Scanzoni 3 – Social Exchange and Behavioral Interdependence , 1979 .

[28]  R. Bies,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome , 1989 .

[29]  P. Ring,et al.  Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations , 1992 .

[30]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Enhancing the transfer of computer-assisted training proficiency in geographically distributed teams. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[32]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[33]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  J. H. Davis,et al.  The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .

[35]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[36]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[37]  M. Deutsch Trust and suspicion , 1958 .

[38]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[39]  Mohammad Muzahid Akbar,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: ITS NATURE AND ANTECEDENTS , 2004 .

[40]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. , 2005 .

[41]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[42]  Donald L. Ferrin,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: The Use of Rewards to Increase and Decrease Trust: Mediating Processes and Differential Effects , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[43]  N. Noorderhaven,et al.  When Does Trust Matter to Alliance Performance , 2006 .