The moderating role of goal commitment on the goal difficulty–performance relationship: A meta-analytic review and critical reanalysis.

Despite the nearly unanimous view that goal commitment is a vital component of goal setting, few studies have empirically assessed its hypothesized role as a moderator of the goal-performance relationship. In addition, those studies that have examined the moderating effects of goal commitment have presented inconsistent conclusions. To clarify this situation, a meta-analysis was conducted to examine the overall strength of the moderating effect of goal commitment. The results indicated that the Goal Difficulty X Goal Commitment effect accounted for less than 3% of the variance in task performance. Additionally, the type of goal commitment measure used (self-report vs. discrepancy) was a significant moderator of this relationship. Measurement issues and directions for future conceptualizations of the goal commitment construct are discussed.

[1]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment , 1989 .

[2]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance , 1984 .

[3]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. , 1986 .

[4]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Commitment as a moderator of the goal−performance relation: a case for clearer construct definition , 1993 .

[5]  Mark E. Tubbs,et al.  An empirical comparison of self-report and discrepancy measures of goal commitment , 1991 .

[6]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[7]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[8]  E. A. Locke.  Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[9]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[10]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated woods workers. , 1975 .

[11]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[12]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[13]  David A. Harrison,et al.  PROMOTING REGULAR EXERCISE IN ORGANIZATIONAL FITNESS PROGRAMS: HEALTH‐RELATED DIFFERENCES IN MOTIVATIONAL BUILDING BLOCKS , 1994 .

[14]  P. Wright.  Reward contingency as an explanatory variable in the incentive-goal setting relationship , 1988 .

[15]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Determinants of Goal Commitment , 1988 .

[16]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  On the meaning and measurement of goal commitment , 1994 .

[17]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Some issues associated with the use of moderated regression , 1984 .

[18]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[19]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[20]  Blair T. Johnson.  DSTAT : software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures , 1992 .

[21]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. , 1989 .

[22]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION, INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, GOAL DIFFICULTY, GOAL ACCEPTANCE, GOAL INSTRUMENTALITY, AND PERFORMANCE , 1978 .

[23]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. , 1987 .