Predicting environmental gradients with fern species composition in Brazilian Amazonia

Aim A major problem for conservation in Amazonia is that species distribution maps are inaccurate. Consequently, conservation planning needs to be based on other information sources such as vegetation and soil maps, which are also inaccurate. We propose and test the use of biotic data on a common and relatively easily inventoried group of plants to infer environmental conditions that can be used to improve maps of floristic patterns for plants in general. Location Brazilian Amazonia. Methods We sampled 326 plots of 250 m × 2 m separated by distances of 1–1800 km. Terrestrial fern individuals were identified and counted. Edaphic data were obtained from soil samples and analysed for cation concentration and texture. Climatic data were obtained from Worldclim. We used a multivariate regression tree to evaluate the hierarchical importance of soils and climate for fern communities and identified significant indicator species for the resultant classification. We then tested how well the edaphic properties of the plots could be predicted on the basis of their floristic composition using two calibration methods, weighted averaging and k-nearest neighbour estimation. Results Soil cation concentration emerged as the most important variable in the regression tree, whereas soil textural and climatic variation played secondary roles. Almost all the plot classes had several fern species with high indicator values for that class. Soil cation concentration was also the variable most accurately predicted on the basis of fern community composition (R2 = 0.65–0.75 for log-transformed data). Predictive accuracy varied little among the calibration methods, and was not improved by the use of abundance data instead of presence–absence data. Conclusions Fern species composition can be used as an indicator of soil cation concentration, which can be expected to be relevant also for other components of rain forests. Presence–absence data are adequate for this purpose, which makes the collecting of additional data potentially very rapid. Comparison with earlier studies suggests that edaphic preferences of fern species have good transferability across geographical regions within lowland Amazonia. Therefore, species and environmental data sets already available in the Amazon region represent a good starting point for generating better environmental and floristic maps for conservation planning.

[1]  B. Nelson,et al.  Validating forest types based on geological and land‐form features in central Amazonia , 2014 .

[2]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Predicting soil properties from floristic composition in western Amazonian rain forests: performance of k‐nearest neighbour estimation and weighted averaging calibration , 2013 .

[3]  Hanna Tuomisto,et al.  Mapping environmental variation in lowland Amazonian rainforests using remote sensing and floristic data , 2013 .

[4]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Strong congruence in tree and fern community turnover in response to soils and climate in central Panama , 2013 .

[5]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Modelling niche and neutral dynamics: on the ecological interpretation of variation partitioning results , 2012 .

[6]  Gabriela Zuquim,et al.  Broad Scale Distribution of Ferns and Lycophytes along Environmental Gradients in Central and Northern Amazonia, Brazil , 2012 .

[7]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Geological control of floristic composition in Amazonian forests , 2011, Journal of biogeography.

[8]  H. Birks,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantitative Climate Reconstructions Based on Late-Quaternary Biological Proxies , 2011 .

[9]  B. Nelson,et al.  Assessing the relationship between forest types and canopy tree beta diversity in Amazonia. , 2010 .

[10]  P. Legendre,et al.  Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. , 2009, Ecology.

[11]  L. Anderson,et al.  Soils of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites , 2009 .

[12]  A. Lima,et al.  Gradients within gradients: The mesoscale distribution patterns of palms in a central Amazonian forest , 2009 .

[13]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Disentangling regional and local tree diversity in the Amazon , 2009 .

[14]  J. Prado,et al.  AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES FROM THE BIOLOGICAL RESERVE OF UATUMÃ, AN AREA WITH PATCHES OF RICH-SOILS IN CENTRAL AMAZONIA, BRAZIL , 2009 .

[15]  J. Prado,et al.  CHECKLIST OF THE FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES OF ACRE STATE, BRAZIL , 2009 .

[16]  J. Prado,et al.  Distribution of pteridophyte communities along environmental gradients in Central Amazonia, Brazil , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[17]  Glenda G. Cárdenas,et al.  Riqueza y Distribución Ecológica de Especies de Pteridofitas en la Zona del Río Yavarí‐Mirín, Amazonía Peruana , 2007 .

[18]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Analysing botanical collecting effort in Amazonia and correcting for it in species range estimation , 2007 .

[19]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Amazonian biodiversity and protected areas: do they meet? , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[20]  M. McGeoch The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators , 2007 .

[21]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Are floristic and edaphic patterns in Amazonian rain forests congruent for trees, pteridophytes and Melastomataceae? , 2007, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[22]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Representing biodiversity: Data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation , 2002, Journal of Biosciences.

[23]  N. Higuchi,et al.  Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonian Forest: Effects of soil and topography , 2006 .

[24]  H. Tuomisto Edaphic niche differentiation among Polybotrya ferns in western Amazonia: implications for coexistence and speciation , 2006 .

[25]  Hanna Tuomisto,et al.  Effects of mesoscale environmental heterogeneity and dispersal limitation on floristic variation in rain forest ferns , 2006 .

[26]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[27]  W. Magnusson,et al.  Mesoscale distribution patterns of Amazonian understorey herbs in relation to topography, soil and watersheds , 2005 .

[28]  W. Magnusson,et al.  Spatial patterns in the understorey shrub genus Psychotria in central Amazonia: effects of distance and topography , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[29]  J. Prado,et al.  Lista anotada das pteridófitas de florestas inundáveis do alto Rio Negro, Município de Santa Isabel do Rio Negro, AM, Brasil , 2005 .

[30]  Y. Lucas,et al.  On the genesis of the soil mantle of the region of Manaus, Central Amazonia, Brazil , 1987, Experientia.

[31]  F. Luizão,et al.  RAPELD: A MODIFICATION OF THE GENTRY METHOD FOR BIODIVERSITY SURVEYS IN LONG-TERM ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH SITES. , 2005 .

[32]  J. Dijkshoorn,et al.  Update of the 1:5 million Soil and Terrain Database for Latin America and the Caribbean (SOTERLAC; version 2.0) , 2005 .

[33]  Kati J. Salovaara,et al.  Forest classification in an Amazonian rainforest landscape using pteridophytes as indicator species , 2004 .

[34]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Rapid Tropical Forest Inventory: a Comparison of Techniques Based on Inventory Data from Western Amazonia , 2004 .

[35]  Glenn De'ath,et al.  Extended dissimilarity: a method of robust estimation of ecological distances from high beta diversity data , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[36]  Steve Juggins,et al.  Weighted averaging partial least squares regression (WA-PLS): an improved method for reconstructing environmental variables from species assemblages , 1993, Hydrobiologia.

[37]  C. Braak,et al.  Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods , 1989, Hydrobiologia.

[38]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Floristic patterns along a 43‐km long transect in an Amazonian rain forest , 2003 .

[39]  Oliver L. Phillips,et al.  Habitat association among Amazonian tree species: a landscape‐scale approach , 2003 .

[40]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  LINKING FLORISTIC PATTERNS WITH SOIL HETEROGENEITY AND SATELLITE IMAGERY IN ECUADORIAN AMAZONIA , 2003 .

[41]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Dispersal, Environment, and Floristic Variation of Western Amazonian Forests , 2003, Science.

[42]  M. Diekmann Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – a review , 2003 .

[43]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Distribution and Diversity of Pteridophytes and Melastomataceae along Edaphic Gradients in Yasuní National Park, Ecuadorian Amazonia1 , 2002 .

[44]  G. De’ath MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION TREES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING SPECIES–ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS , 2002 .

[45]  J. Terborgh,et al.  DOMINANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TREE SPECIES IN UPPER AMAZONIAN TERRA FIRME FORESTS , 2001 .

[46]  O. Phillips,et al.  A comparison of fine-scale distribution patterns of four plant groups in an Amazonian rainforest. , 2000 .

[47]  J. Svenning,et al.  Microhabitat specialization in a species‐rich palm community in Amazonian Ecuador , 1999 .

[48]  L. G. Lohmann,et al.  Flora da Reserva Ducke. Guia de identificacao das plantas vasculares de uma floresta de terra-firme na Amazonia Central , 1999 .

[49]  A. Balmford On hotspots and the use of indicators for reserve selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Edaphic Distribution of Some Species of the Fern Genus Adiantum in Western Amazonia 1 , 1998 .

[51]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[52]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Use of Melastomataceae and pteridophytes for revealing phytogeographical patterns in Amazonian rain forests , 1997, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[53]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Influence of edaphic specialization on pteridophyte distribution in neotropical rain forests , 1996 .

[54]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[55]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Diatoms and pH Reconstruction , 1990 .

[56]  I. N. Veselovskij On the genesis of , 1973 .

[57]  I. J. Johnson,et al.  Associations between Species of Grasses and Legumes1 , 1943 .